Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 9;10(2):197–202. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2016.12.009

Table 2.

Stepwise Univariate and Multivariate Cox Regression Analyses to Identify Predictors of Grade ≥ 2 RP

Characteristics Univariate Analysis (RP ≥ grade 2)
Multivariate Analysis (RP ≥ grade 2)
HR 95% CI P HR 95% CI P
Age (≥66 vs <66) 1.236 0.964-1.585 .095 1.361 1.038-1.784 .026
Gender (male vs female) 1.005 0.784-1.290 .966 0.882 0.673-1.155 .361
Race (black and other vs white) 1.053 0.742-1.493 .773 0.876 0.605-1.267 .481
Disease stage (IIIB, IV, recurrence vs I-IIIA) 1.010 0.782-1.303 .941 0.857 0.653-1.126 .269
Histology (SCC & other vs Adn) 0.954 0.743-1.224 .711 0.982 0.749-1.287 .894
KPS (≥80 vs <80) 0.771 0.554-1.075 .125 0.687 0.481-0.98 .038
Concurrent chemotherapy (yes vs no) 1.102 0.739-1.644 .633 0.966 0.609-1.532 .966
Smoking status (current/former vs never) 0.825 0.532-1.279 .39 0.769 0.474-1.248 .288
Total dose (≥69.03 vs <69.03 Gy) 0.799 0.622-1.026 .079 0.83 0.63-1.093 .184
GTV (≥95.19 vs <95.19 cm3) 1.539 1.186-1.999 .001 1.299 0.977-1.726 .072
MLD (≥17.93 vs <17.93 Gy) 2.08 1.601-2.703 .001 1.883 1.402-2.528 <.001
Technique (proton vs 3D-CRT + IMRT) 0.932 0.688-1.263 .65 1.105 0.794-1.537 .555
Muc5b rs35705950 (TT/GT vs GG) 1.009 0.728-1.399 .958 0.921 0.645-1.315 .65

Abbreviations: NI, not included; KPS, Karnofsky Performance Status score; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma; 3D-CRT, 3-dimensional conformal (photon) radiation therapy; IMRT, intensity-modulated (photon) radiation therapy.

The propensity score was used for adjustments of confounders in the multivariate analysis.