Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 9;10(2):197–202. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2016.12.009

Table 3.

Stepwise Univariate and Multivariate Cox Regression Analyses to Identify Predictors of Grade ≥ 3 RP

Characteristics Univariate Analysis (RP ≥ grade 3)
Multivariate Analysis (RP ≥ grade 3)
HR 95% CI P HR 95% CI P
Age (≥66 vs <66) 1.545 0.993-2.401 .054 1.502 0.944-2.39 .086
Gender (male vs female) 1.188 0.764-1.848 .443 0.919 0.574-1.472 .726
Race (black and other vs white) 1.048 0.568-1.934 .881 0.74 0.388-1.411 .36
Disease stage (IIIB, IV, recurrence vs I-IIIA) 0.779 0.499-1.217 .273 0.696 0.437-1.107 .126
Histology (SCC & other vs Adn) 0.968 0.625-1.498 .883 0.969 0.606-1.549 .894
KPS (≥80 vs <80) 0.51 0.305-0.852 .01 0.416 0.24-0.722 .002
Concurrent chemotherapy (yes vs no) 1.032 0.516-2.064 .928 1.24 0.537-2.866 .614
Smoking status (current/former vs never) 1.123 0.489-2.580 .784 0.834 0.333-2.088 .698
Total dose (≥69.03 vs <69.03 Gy) 0.657 0.421-1.026 .065 0.758 0.468-1.227 .26
GTV (≥95.19 vs <95.19 cm3) 2.76 1.678-4.539 <.001 2.124 1.262-3.577 .005
MLD (≥17.93vs <17.93 Gy) 3.922 2.318-6.639 <.001 3.844 2.1-7.038 <.001
Technique (proton vs 3D-CRT + IMRT) 0.65 0.359-1.176 .154 1.395 0.823-2.363 .216
Muc5b rs35705950 (TT/GT vs GG) 1.009 0.728-1.399 .958 1.614 0.92-2.831 .095

The propensity score was used for adjustments of confounders in the multivariate analysis.