Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Histopathology. 2016 Dec 13;70(4):549–557. doi: 10.1111/his.13105

Table 2.

Histological and immunohistochemical characteristics of pyloric gland adenomas in familial adenomatous polyposis.

Patient Dx Dysplasia Size (mm) location Parietal cells β-catenin P53 Ki67 MUC2 MUC5 MUC6 CDX2
1 PGA1* LGD U U None M np mild increase np surface pos failed neg
1 PGA2 LGD 17 corpus scattered M np not increased neg surface pos focal pos focal pos
2 PGA3 Focal HGD 15 corpus or fundus Many Focal nuclear in HGD WT Increased in HGD neg surface pos pos focal pos
2 PGA4 LGD 8 corpus scattered M WT Focally increased neg surface pos pos focal pos
3 PGA5 LGD 40 corpus Scattered and focally abundant M WT not increased neg surface pos focal pos neg
3 PGA6 LGD 13 corpus scattered np np np np surface pos pos np
3 PGA7 LGD U corpus or fundus scattered np np np np surface pos pos np

Dx: diagnosis; PGA: pyloric gland adenoma; LGD: low-grade dysplasia; IGD: intermediate grade dysplasia; HGD: high-grade dysplasia; M: membranous β-catenin expression; WT: wild-type expression of p53; neg: negative staining; pos: positive staining; np: not performed; U: unknown.

*

This was a very small biopsy of a PGA and therefore suboptimal for histopathological assessment.