Table 2.
Results of global and induced time-frequency responses for all IES groups, simultaneously with IES and locally or at a distance around IES.
| Patients | Simultaneously with IES | Around IES | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4—50 HZ | > 50 HZ | Local synchronization 4–50 Hz band | Distant synchronization 4–10 Hz band | |
| 1 |
 G NS TFR: 70%, I :59%
|
NS |
GTFR: 42%, ITFR: 35%
|
 AF3-FP1-F1-F3-F5-AF8-F4-F6-C6-P2-P4-TP8-TP10-C1-C7-Fz-Pz-POz |
| 2 |
GTFR: 100%, ITFR: 67%
|
GTFR: 28%, ITFR: 11%
|
GTFR: 95%, ITFR: 84%
|
*
|
| 3L |
GTFR: 75%, ITFR: 12%
|
NS |
GTFR: 20%, ITFR: 3%
|
NS |
| 3R |
GTFR: 72%, ITFR: 25%
|
NS |
GTFR: 10%, ITFR: 4%
|
NS |
| 4 |
GTFR: 100%, ITFR: 100%
|
GTFR: 48%, ITFR: 45%
|
GTFR: 100 %, ITFR: 100 %
|
Fz-FP2-AF8-FC3 |
| 5 |
GTFR: 89 %, ITFR: 33 %
|
NS |
GTFR: 16 %, ITFR: 8 %
|
AF8-FC1-FC5-FT7-F7-TP9-TP7-CP1-CP2-P8-PO4-PO8 |
| 6 |
GTFR: 100%, ITFR: 100%
|
GTFR: 61%, ITFR: 61%
|
GTFR: 91%, ITFR: 91%
|
NS |
| 7L |
GTFR: 78%, ITFR: 34%
|
GTFR: 11%, ITFR: 9%
|
GTFR: 27%, ITFR: 14%
|
AF7-FPz-AFz-FPz-FP2-AF4-AF8 |
| 7R |
GTFR: 100%, ITFR: 73%
|
GTFR: 42%, ITFR: 41%
|
GTFR: 53%, ITFR: 44%
|
AF7-FP1-FPz-FP2 |
| 8 |
GTFR: 97%, ITFR: 30%
|
GTFR: 2%, ITFR: 2%
|
GTFR: 53%, ITFR: 37%
|
AF7-FP1FPz-FP2-AF8-F7-F8-FT8 |
Increase of power signal analyzed by time-frequency method (baseline [−1000; −600 ms] (p < 0.0002)
Decrease of power signal analyzed by time-frequency method (baseline [−1000 ms; −600 ms] (p < 0.0002)
NS, Not Significant; GTFR, Global Time-frequency Response; ITFR, Induced Time-frequency Response; x %, number of electrodes involved in changes of synchronization; 3L, left IES for patient 3; 3R, right IES for patient 3; 7L, left IES for patient 7; 7R,right IES for patient 7.
Electrodes involved in decreased distant synchronization for patient 2: AF3-AF7-FP1-F1-F3-F5-F7FC1-FC5-FC3-FT7-C1-C3-C5-T7-CP1-Cp3-Cp5-TP7-TP9-P3-P5-P7-O1-PO3-PO7-FPz-AFz-Fz-FCz-Cz-CPz-Pz-POz-Oz-FP2-AF4-AF8-F2-F4-F6-F8-FC2-FC4-FC6-FT8-C6-T8- Cp6-TP8-P6-O2-PO4