Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 2;19(1):21–28. doi: 10.1093/europace/euw099

Table 2.

Procedural data

N= Procedure RFT PT FT LV approach EAM ICE 3D Acute success Recurrence
Patient 1 First 407 180 16 Retroaortic Yes Yes Yes No
Patient 2 First 871 305 18 Retroaortic Yes Yes Yes No
Patient 3 First 601 198 27 Transseptal Yes No Yes Yes
Patient 3 Second 301 280 16 Retroaortic Yes No Yes Yes
Patient 4 First 780 240 10 Retroaortic Yes No Yes Yes
Patient 4 Second 416 240 30 Retroaortic Yes Yes Yes No
Patient 5 First 266 285 42 Retroaortic Yes No Yes Yes
Patient 5 Second 266 135 19 Transseptal Yes No Yes Yes
Patient 6 First 300 230 17 Transseptal Yes Yes Yes No
Patient 7 First 750 195 30 Transseptal Yes No No Yes
Patient 7 Second 321 115 10 Transseptal Yes Yes Yes No
Patient 8 First 260 195 22 Transseptal Yes No Yes No
Patient 9 First 340 205 23 Retroaortic Yes Yes Yes No
Patient 10 First 615 405 57 Retroaortic Yes Yes Yes Yes
Patient 10 Second 420 135 15 Retroaortic Yes Yes Yes No
Patient 11 First 346 210 20 Retroaortic Yes Yes Yes No
Patient 12 First 315 195 33 Retroaortic Yes Yes Yes No
Patient 13 First 420 140 9 Retroaortic Yes Yes Yes No
Patient 14 First 350 250 67 Transseptal Yes No Yes No
Patient 14 Second 320 240 48 Retroaortic Yes No Yes No
Patient 15 First 659 150 14 Transseptal Yes No Yes Yes
Patient 15 Second 530 230 25 Transseptal Yes Yes Yes Yes
Patient 15 Third 511 215 21 Retroaortic Yes Yes Yes No
Patient 16 First 1055 150 12 Retroaortic Yes Yes Yes No

N, patients 1–16; Procedure, first or second procedure; Success, complete suppression of the arrhythmia; Recurrence, reappearance of the same clinical arrhythmia during follow-up; FU, follow-up (months); RFT, duration of radiofrequency delivery during the ablation in seconds; PT, duration of the procedure in minutes; FT, fluoroscopy time in minutes; EAM, use of 3D electroanatomical mapping systems (CARTO); ICE 3D, use of 3D intracardiac echocardiography (CATO Sound).