Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 10;12(2):e0172027. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172027

Table 2. Odds ratios (ORs) of FLD for quintiles of RBC count.

Model1
(Age adjusted)
Model2
(Age+WC adjusted)
Model3
(Age+FBG+TG+HDL adjusted)
Model4
(Age+WC+FBG+TG+HDL adjusted)
Men(×1012/L)
Q1(3.07–4.83) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Q2(4.83–5.05) 1.48(1.19–1.84) 1.09(0.85–1.40) 1.32(1.04–1.67) 1.04(0.80–1.34)
Q3(5.05–5.24) 2.07(1.67–2.57) 1.37(1.07–1.76) 1.74(1.38–2.20) 1.27(0.98–1.64)
Q4(5.24–5.49) 2.18(1.75–2.71) 1.48(1.15–1.91) 1.79(1.41–2.27) 1.35(1.04–2.76)
Q5(5.49–7.49) 2.56(2.06–3.18) 1.67(1.30–2.13) 2.05(1.62–2.59) 1.51(1.17–1.96)
P Trend <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.001
Women(×1012/L)
Q1(3.15–4.28) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Q2(4.28–4.46) 1.34(0.96–1.87) 1.26(0.88–1.81) 1.35(0.95–1.92) 1.28(0.88–1.85)
Q3(4.46–4.62) 2.28(1.66–3.12) 1.84 (1.30–2.59) 1.96(1.40–2.74) 1.67(1.17–2.38)
Q4(4.62–4.83) 3.04(2.24–4.12) 2.26(1.62–3.15) 2.56(1.85–3.54) 2.03(1.45–2.86)
Q5(4.83–6.64) 3.69(2.74–4.98) 2.63(1.89–3.65) 2.84(2.06–3.91) 2.27(1.62–3.19)
P Trend <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
P-interaction 0.266 0.435 0.585 0.529
Total(×1012/L)
Q1(3.07–4.41) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Q2(4.42–4.68) 1.77(1.44–2.17) 1.53(1.21–1.92) 1.55(1.25–1.93) 1.41(1.12–1.78)
Q3(4.69–4.95) 2.32(1.89–2.85) 1.67(1.33–2.11) 1.86(1.50–2.31) 1.47(1.16–1.87)
Q4(4.96–5.28) 3.41(2.75–4.21) 2.23(1.74–2.84) 2.65(2.11–3.33) 1.94(1.51–2.50)
Q5(5.29–7.49) 4.30(3.47–5.33) 2.52(1.96–3.22) 3.09(2.45–3.88) 2.12(1.64–2.73)
P Trend <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001

ORs of FLD for quintiles of RBC count were calculated with binary logistic regression analyses in different models, with Q1 as the reference.

Models: Model1, adjusted for age; Model2, adjusted for age and WC; Model3, adjusted for age, FPG, TG and HDL; Model4, adjusted for age, WC, FPG, TG and HDL. Sex was also adjusted in all the models of the total group.

P-interaction, interaction between sex and quintiles of RBC count.