Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 10;12(2):e0172031. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172031

Table 4. Multivariate survival analysis using Cox proportional hazards regression models.

Model Variable Category Hazard ratio 95% CI p value
1 pT stage T1 vs. T2-4 3.397 1.403–8.223 0.007
pN stage N0 vs. N1-3 4.024 1.610–10.057 0.003
Lymphovascular invasion Absent vs. present 1.097 0.462–2.608 0.834
Estrogen receptor ≥90% vs. <90% 1.735 0.811–3.710 0.156
Progesterone receptor ≥40% vs. <40% 1.900 0.886–4.075 0.099
Ki-67 index by average method <18% vs. ≥18% 2.431 1.088–5.434 0.030
2 T stage T1 vs. T2-4 3.212 1.319–7.823 0.010
N stage N0 vs. N1-3 4.038 1.614–10.100 0.003
Lymphovascular invasion Absent vs. present 1.056 0.445–2.505 0.902
Estrogen receptor ≥90% vs. <90% 1.634 0.764–3.494 0.205
Progesterone receptor ≥40% vs. <40% 1.971 0.919–4.226 0.081
Ki-67 index by hot spot method <22% vs. ≥22% 3.058 1.287–7.267 0.011

P values were calculated from Cox proportional hazards regression models with backward stepwise selection.

Abbreviation: CI, confidence interval