Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 6;6:e19944. doi: 10.7554/eLife.19944

Figure 1. Following oligomerisation, the Bak N-segment, α1 and α1-α2 loop become fully solvent-exposed in contrast to the partially exposed core (α2-α5) and latch (α6-α9).

(A) Solvent exposure of hBak cysteine mutants was assessed by IASD labelling before (lane 2), during (lane 3) and after (lane 4) treatment with tBid. Controls of unlabelled (untreated, lane 1) and fully labelled (denatured, lane 5) Bak were included for comparison. Example IEF western blots are shown. (B) Quantitation of IASD labelling before and after treatment with tBid for the panel of previously untested Bak residues. Data are mean ± SD (n ≥ 3), or range (n = 2), with n for each residue labelled on the x-axis. IASD labelling data for residue V194C were from (Westphal et al., 2014) (denoted #). Residues for which there is a significant difference in IASD labelling before versus after tBid are in bold and underlined (p<0.05). (C) Heat map overview of Bak IASD labelling with tBid treatment from (B) pooled with published analyses from (Westphal et al., 2014)(denoted #) or (Iyer et al., 2015)(denoted ^ ) and from treatment with the tBidBax chimera (denoted *; see also Figure 1—figure supplement 3; Figure 1—source data 1). (D) Schematic of Bak structural rearrangement from its non-activated monomeric state to the activated dimer. Helices are numbered for the non-activated Bak. Note the complete solvent-exposure of α1 and the α1-α2 loop in the activated dimer. The following figure supplements are available for Figure 1.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.19944.003

Figure 1—source data 1. Quantitation of Bak IASD labelling before, during and after Bak activation; table of values.
The percentage IASD labelling for each replicate and the summary statistics (number of replicates, mean, standard deviation) are shown. Two-tailed unpaired t-tests comparing the mean percentage of IASD labelled Bak (before versus after, before versus during, and during versus after tBid treatment) are shown, and significant p-values (p<0.05) are highlighted in green. Previously untested Bak residues have been pooled with data from previous studies (# denotes data from Westphal et al. [2014], ^ denotes data from Iyer et al. [2015]).
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.19944.004

Figure 1.

Figure 1—figure supplement 1. Bak cysteine variants retain apoptotic function.

Figure 1—figure supplement 1.

Bak-/-Bax-/- MEF expressing Bak cysteine variants were treated with 10 μM etoposide for 24 hr and the percentage cell death quantified by propidium iodide uptake. Data are for unpublished mutants only and are the mean ± SD. The number of replicates (n) for each residue is labelled on the x-axis.
Figure 1—figure supplement 2. Bak cysteine variants retain apoptotic function in response to tBid.

Figure 1—figure supplement 2.

Mitochondrial fractions from cells expressing the indicated Bak cysteine mutants were incubated with tBid, and samples fractionated to measure Bak-mediated release of cytochrome c from the pellet into the supernatant (SN). This data shows that cell killing in response to etoposide (Figure 1—figure supplement 1) correlates with cytochrome c release initiated by tBid.
Figure 1—figure supplement 3. Quantitation of Bak IASD labelling before, during and after Bak activation; graphical output.

Figure 1—figure supplement 3.

(A,B,C). Labelling before, during or after treatment with tBid, segregated by Bak N-extremity (A), Core (B), and C-extremity (C). Previously untested Bak residues have been pooled with data from previous studies (# denotes data from Westphal et al. [2014], ^ denotes data from Iyer et al. [2015]). Data are mean ± SD, or range (n = 2), with n for each residue labelled on the x-axis. Residues for which there is a significant difference in IASD labelling before versus after tBid are in bold and underlined (p<0.05). (D) IASD labelling for selected Bak variants before, during and after treatment with tBidBax chimera (Hockings et al., 2015). Data are mean ± SD, or range (n = 2), with n for each residue labelled on the x-axis. Residues for which there is a significant difference in IASD labelling before versus after tBid are in bold and underlined (p<0.05).