Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 9;6:e22520. doi: 10.7554/eLife.22520

Figure 2. Function of RbpA and RbpA derivatives in transcription initiation and cooperativity with CarD.

(A) Schematic diagram denoting the RbpA derivatives used in subsequent assays. (B) The effect of RbpA or RbpA derivatives (denoted at the bottom) on activation of abortive initiation from three different promoters (VapB, AP3, AP3anti-35, denoted at the top) with or without CarD. The transcription activity for each promoter was normalized with respect to holo activity on that promoter (holo alone on each promoter was normalized to a value of 1, as shown in lane 1). The error bars denote the standard error from a minimum of three experiments. (C) Promoter complex lifetimes measured by abortive initiation on the AP3 promoter. In the top panel, [32P]-labeled abortive transcript production at times after addition of a large excess of competitor promoter trap DNA (Davis et al., 2015) was monitored by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and autoradiography. On the bottom, transcript production was quantified by phosphorimagery and plotted. The lines indicate single-exponential decay curves fit to the data points. The calculated decay half-lives (t1/2) are shown to the right of the gel images. (D) Structural model showing the Msm RbpA/TIC (color coded as in Figure 1) along with CarD (red), superimposed by aligning the thermus CarD/RPo structure (PDB ID 4XLR; (Bae et al., 2015a).

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.22520.004

Figure 2.

Figure 2—figure supplement 1. Transcription templates and abortive initiation data.

Figure 2—figure supplement 1.

(A) Sequences of promoter templates used in the transcription experiments (sequences shown only from −60 to +15) for the VapB, AP3, and engineered AP3anti-35 promoters. (B) Example abortive transcription data used to generate Figure 2B. [32P]-labeled abortive transcripts were visualized by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and autoradiography. Experiments on each promoter were performed using different specific activities of [32P] so the band intensities between each promoter are not comparable. (C) Abortive transcription reactions directly comparing transcription on AP3 (left) and AP3anti-35 (right). Transcription by holo alone on AP3anti-35 (lane 5) is more than 10-fold weaker than on AP3 (lane 1).s.