Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Child Care Health Dev. 2016 Aug 11;43(2):232–239. doi: 10.1111/cch.12392

Table 1.

Distribution of descriptive characteristics for each of the girls and women who sustained a femoral fracture and their families (n = 14).

Characteristics n (%)
Mutation type C-terminal deletion 2 (14%)
Early truncating 1 (7%)
Large deletion 1 (7%)
p.Arg168* 1 (7%)
p.Arg255* 1 (7%)
p.Arg270* 1 (7%)
p.Arg294* 2 (14%)
p.Thr158Met 1 (7%)
Other 3 (21%)
Negative 1 (7%)
Residence at time of fracture Parental home 9 (64%)
Grandparent home 1 (7%)
Foster home 1 (7%)
Group home 3 (21%)
Remoteness Area (ARIA classificationa) Major city of Australia 11 (79%)
Inner regional Australia 3 (21 %)
Outer regional Australia
Remote or very remote Australia

Age group at time of fracture 0–7 years 3 (21%)
7–12 years 5 (36%)
13–18 years 2 (14%)
>18 years 4 (29%)
Mobility level Independent walking 3 (21%)
Walking with assistance 4 (29%)
Wheelchair dependent 7 (50%)
Previous fracture Yes 4 (29%)
No 10 (71%)
Pubertal status Pre-menarche 10 (71%)
Post-menarche 4 (29%)
Caregiver’s highest achieved education University degree 6 (43%)
Vocational qualification 4 (29%)
High school year 12 1 (7%)
Some high school 3 (21%)
a

accessibility/Remoteness Index of Australia