Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Feb 15.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2016 Dec 13;147:262–271. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.12.022

Table 2.

Cluster Peaks for whole sample effect of difficulty (Hard vs. Easy)

A. Positive Modulation to Difficulty Effect [Hard > Easy]
Cluster Label BA k X Y Z t-value p FWE
L/R anterior cingulate &
R insula / inferior frontal
8 3050 6 24 45 10.30 <.001
13 30 24 −3 10.06
46 45 36 18 9.94
R posterior/inferior parietal &
middle occipital
7 2809 30 −57 54 9.81 <.001
18 27 −87 18 9.67
40 48 −39 48 9.65
L Cerebellar Crus I & II 483 −33 −69 −45 8.49 <.001
−30 −66 −33 8.43
−9 −78 −30 7.94
L insula 13 153 −30 21 0 8.18 <.001
L precentral & inferior frontal 44 119 −45 3 27 6.02 .001
44 −57 18 33 4.58
L inferior orbital frontal 47 64 −45 45 −6 5.61 .009
B. Negative Modulation to Difficulty Effect [Hard < Easy]
Cluster Label BA k X Y Z t-value pFWE
L/R Precuneus 31 13885 0 −63 24 11.90 <.001
31 9 −54 33 11.51
23 −6 −54 27 11.42
R inferior occipital 18 163 27 −96 −3 10.70 <.001
L inferior occipital 18 115 −24 −96 −9 8.42 .001
R cerebellum 49 9 −54 −45 6.98 .017
R cerebellar crus II 206 24 −84 −36 6.67 .005
45 −75 −39 5.36
L middle orbital frontal 47 79 −27 36 −15 6.64 <.001
R middle frontal 8 40 24 33 39 5.30 .032

Note. p < .0001 uncorrected; Abbreviations: BA – Brodmann Area; L – left; R – Right