Table 2.

Statistically significant contrasts^* between baseline and post-training assessments

Assessment time point	Accuracy measures				Speed measures
	Cognitive domain	Contrast*	P	B†	Cognitive domain	Contrast*	P	B†
21 days	Face memory	PE > TAU	0.020	0.44	Face memory	PE > TAU	0.016	1.90
	Working memory	PE > TAU	0.006‡	0.63	Spatial memory	YT > TAU	0.003‡	1.07
	Face memory	PE > YT	0.020	0.53	Working memory	PE > TAU	0.030	0.70
					Face memory	YT > TAU	0.042	1.75
3 months	Face memory	PE > TAU	0.002‡	0.75	Face memory	YT > TAU	0.006‡	1.97
	Face memory	PE > YT	0.039	0.41
	Abstraction and mental flexibility	YT > TAU	0.019	0.30
6 months	Attention	PE > TAU	0.025	0.61	Attention	YT > PE	0.036	0.51
	Face memory	PE > TAU	0.007‡	0.52	Emotion	PE > TAU	0.013	0.87
	Working memory	PE > YT	0.014	0.52	Emotion	YT > TAU	0.001‡	0.95
					Face memory	YT > TAU	0.008‡	1.58
					Spatial memory	YT > TAU	0.008‡	0.79

PE, supervised physical exercise training with TAU; TAU, treatment as usual; YT, supervised yoga training with TAU.

^*Contrasts were calculated from mixed model analysis with group (YT, PE, TAU), time (baseline, 21 days, 3 months and 6 months), time × group interaction, gender, age and head of the household (HOH) occupation. The p-values represent contrast significance levels.

^†Standardised regression coefficients of the contrast-specific dummy group variables from linear regressions were used as measures of effect sizes. The dependent variables were the changes of follow-up scores from the baseline scores and age, gender and HOH occupation as covariates.

^‡Significant following Hochberg adjustment.