Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 13;9:16. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2017.00016

Table 2.

Summary of studies using NIBS to influence memory function in MCI patients.

Experiment Participants NIBS Study design Stimulation protocol Target area Stimulated cognitive process and outcome Control condition Tests/ follow-up Results
Anderkova et al. (2015) 8 MCI and 12 AD patients Age: 73 ± 7 rTMS Crossover design. Each patient received one stimulation session in a random order, over each target area Three 22-min sessions at 10 Hz. (1/day) IFG-STG Sustained attention, psychomotor speed, processing efficacy, set-switching, executive functions, processing speed, attentional and visual processing, encoding and recognition VTX Prior and immediately after each session Enhanced speed processing
Eliasova et al. (2014) 10 aMCI patient Age: 72 ± 8 rTMS Cross Overdesign. Each patient received one stimulation sessions in a random order, over each target area Two 22-min sessions at 10 Hz. (1/day) IFG Sustained attention, psychomotor speed, efficacy of cognitive processing, set-switching, executive functions, speed cognitive process attentional and visual processing, encoding and recognition VTX Prior and immediately after each session. improvement of attention and psychomotor speed
Cotelli et al. (2012) 1 aMCI patient Age: 69 22 healthy controls Age: 64 ± 4 rTMS Uncontrolled pre-post study Ten 25-min sessions at 20 Hz (5/week) IPL Associative memory, reasoning language, learning, short and long term memory, praxis attention, executive functions Uncontrolled 2 baselines, immediately after stimulation protocol (2 weeks), 24 weeks Enhanced associative memory, long term memory
Drumond Marra et al. (2015) 34 MCI patients Age: 60–74 rTMS Double blind controlled study Ten 25-min sessions at 10 HZ (5/week) Left DLPFC Cognitive processing, everyday memory, logical memory, long-term narrative memory, short-term auditory-verbal memory, rate of learning, learning and retrieval, working memory, executive functions Sham group with a placebo coil. Immediately and 30 days after stimulation protocol Improved everyday memory for at least 1 month
Meinzer et al. (2015) 18 MCI patients Age: 69.56 ± 5.56 18 healthy controls Age: 67.44 ± 7.27 atDCS Double-blind, cross-over, randomized, sham stimulation. During Cognitive Task and resting state fMRI One session at 1 mA during 20 min. Left ventral IFG Cognitive processing. Sham group: atDCS turned off after 30 s During stimulation No follow-up Improved word retrieval. Reduced activity in the bilateral prefrontal cortex, right middle temporal gyrus, left basal ganglia and thalamus
Sedlackova et al. (2008) 7 MCI-V patients Age: 70.3 ± 8.7 rTMS Randomized, blind, cross-over study One 30-min session at 10 HZ (1/day) Left DLPFC Executive function, working memory, and psychomotor speed. MC (control site) During stimulationNo follow-up No effects
Turriziani et al. (2012) 8 MCI patients 66.4 ± 5.7 100 healthy controls Age: 20–35 rTMS Blind, crossover study One 10-min session at 1 Hz. Left and right DLPFC Cognitive processing, non-verbal recognition memory, verbal recognition memory Sham group: coil held close to the DLPFC but angled away Immediately after stimulation. No follow-up Improved the performance on the non-verbal recognition memory test
Solé-Padullés et al. (2006) 40 adults with SCI Age: 66.95 ± 9.43 rTMS Pre-post fMRI, randomized double blind sham stimulation One 5-min session at 5 Hz PFC Associative memory Sham group: coil held tangentially to the head, with its edge resting on the scalp. Immediately after stimulation during post fMRI Improvement in associative memory task. Higher activation of the right inferior and middle frontal giry together with the middle and superior occipital gyri.
Manenti et al. (2016) 20 PD patients with MCI Age: 67.1 ± 7.2 atDCS Double-blind, cross-over, randomized, sham stimulation. During physical therapy. One session at 2 mA during 25 min per (5/week) DLPFC Motor physical therapist for PD. Outcome evaluated: clinical neuropsychological, and motor task, Sham group: atDCS turned off after 30 s Prior and immediately after and 3 month follow up Improvement in motor abilities, reduction of depressive symptoms in sham and atDCS. Improvement in the PD cognitive Rating Scale and verbal fluency test, only in tDCS.

NIBS, Non-invasive brain stimulation; atDCS, anodal transcranial direct current stimulation; rTMS, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; AD, Alzheimer’s disease; MCI, mild cognitive impairment; VMCI, vascular mild cognitive impairment; PD, Parkinson’s disease; SCI, subjective cognitive impairment; DLPFC, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; IFG, inferior frontal gyrus; IPL, inferior parietal lobule; MC, motor cortex; PFC, prefrontal cortex; STG, superior temporal gyrus; VTX, vertex.