Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1991 Dec 1;88(23):10905–10906. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.23.10905

Evolution of behavior by density-dependent natural selection.

P Z Guo 1, L D Mueller 1, F J Ayala 1
PMCID: PMC53040  PMID: 1961760

Abstract

Theories of density-dependent natural selection predict that evolution should favor those genotypes with the highest per capita rates of population growth under the current density conditions. These theories are silent about the mechanisms that may give rise to these increases in density-dependent growth rates. We have observed the evolution of six populations of Drosophila melanogaster recently placed in crowded environments after nearly 200 generations at low-population density in the laboratory. After 25 generations in these crowded cultures all six populations showed the predicted increase in population growth rates at high-population density with the concomitant decrease in their growth rates at low densities. These changes in rates of population growth are accompanied by changes in the feeding and pupation behavior of the larvae: those populations that have evolved at high-population densities have higher feeding rates and are less likely to pupate on or near the food surface than populations maintained at low densities. These changes in behavior serve to increase the competitive ability of larvae for limited food and reduce mortality under crowded conditions during the pupal stage of development. A detailed understanding of the mechanisms by which populations evolve under density-dependent natural selection will provide a framework for understanding the nature of trade-offs in life history evolution.

Full text

PDF
10905

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Mueller L. D., Ayala F. J. Trade-off between r-selection and K-selection in Drosophila populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Feb;78(2):1303–1305. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.2.1303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Mueller L. D. Ecological determinants of life-history evolution. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1991 Apr 29;332(1262):25–30. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1991.0029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Mueller L. D. Evolution of competitive ability in Drosophila by density-dependent natural selection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Jun;85(12):4383–4386. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.12.4383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Mueller L. D., Guo P. Z., Ayala F. J. Density-dependent natural selection and trade-offs in life history traits. Science. 1991 Jul 26;253(5018):433–435. doi: 10.1126/science.1907401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Peters RP, Bergmann G, Mueller RM. Quenching of interacting moments and anomalous Fermi-liquid behavior in disordered Kondo alloys at low temperatures. Phys Rev Lett. 1988 Mar 14;60(11):1093–1096. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.60.1093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Sewell D., Burnet B., Connolly K. Genetic analysis of larval feeding behaviour in Drosophila melanogaster. Genet Res. 1974 Oct;24(2):163–173. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300015196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES