Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jan 3.
Published in final edited form as: Chembiochem. 2016 Dec 8;18(1):96–100. doi: 10.1002/cbic.201600564

Table 1.

Comparison of calculated oscillator strengths and bioluminescence emission intensities.

Compound Name Oscillator
Strengtha
Rel. BLIb
graphic file with name nihms838720t1.jpg D–Luc 100 100

graphic file with name nihms838720t2.jpg 6'–deoxyLuc 1.4 <0.01c
graphic file with name nihms838720t3.jpg 6'–methoxyLuc 57.2 <0.01

graphic file with name nihms838720t4.jpg 6'–aminoLuc
6'–MeNHLH2
6'–Me2NLH2
91.9
94.9
102.9
61
101
1
graphic file with name nihms838720t5.jpg CycLuc1 127.6 38

graphic file with name nihms838720t6.jpg 4'–BrLuc 86.1 3.1
graphic file with name nihms838720t7.jpg 5'–BrLuc 104 46.0
graphic file with name nihms838720t8.jpg 7'–BrLuc 79.3 3.4
a

Calculated as a theoretical maximum.

b

Bioluminescence was measured using 100 µM luciferin and 1 µg Fluc.

c

No signal observed.