Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Feb 13.
Published in final edited form as: Subst Use Misuse. 2016 Sep 23;52(1):43–51. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2016.1214150

Table 3.

Performance of Hazardous Drinking Index (HDI) and CAGE in predicting DSM IV alcohol abuse or dependence

Instrument Cutpointa % Correct Sensitivity Specificity PPVb
HDI
 Cut ≥ 1 65.29 95.16 58.59 34.01
Cut ≥ 2b 77.10 90.32 74.14 43.92
 Cut ≥ 3 84.34 79.84 85.35 55.00
 Cut ≥ 4 87.30 62.10 92.95 66.38
 Cut ≥ 5 88.92 54.84 96.56 78.16
CAGE
Cut ≥ 1 81.17 81.45 81.09 49.74
 Cut ≥ 2 84.83 44.35 95.38 71.43

Note

a

Bolded text represents optimal cutpoint, i.e., ≥ 90% sensitivity and highest possible specificity

b

PPV=Positive predictive value