Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Physiol Behav. 2016 Dec 22;170:141–150. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.11.041

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Plasma AEA concentration from mice with wheel access as a function of the number of wheel revolutions in the 30 minutes prior to plasma sampling (N = 89). The number of wheel revolutions (transformed to the 0.4 power for statistical analyses [Table 5], but shown here as raw values) was a significant positive predictor of AEA values (p = 0.0043), home-cage was a negative predictor (p = 0.0383), and HR mice had lower levels than C mice after adjusting for these relationships (Table 5). The interactions between linetype and amount of wheel running or home-cage activity were not statistically significant (results not shown and these terms not included in final statistical model).