Table 1.
Sample ID | Reported by manufacturer | XRD and SAXS results | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Particle size | SSA (m2/g) | Density (g/cm3) | Rietveld analysis (%) | Diameter (nm) by SAXS | Scherrer diametera (nm) | Calc. SSAb (m2/g) | |
Nano-ZnO50 nm | <50 nm | >10.8 | 5.61 | 36 | 33 | 32.4 | |
Nano-ZnO100 nm | <100 nm | 15–25 | 5.61 | 48 | 22.3 | ||
Bulk-ZnO | Not reported | 5.61 | 85 | 12.6 | |||
Nano-Zn metal | <50 nmc | 35–50 | 7.133 | ||||
Bulk-Zn metal | ∼100 mesh | ||||||
Nano-rutile (TiO2) | <100 nm | 50 | 4.17 | 98 % rutile | 80 | 18.0 | |
2 % anatase | 81 | ||||||
Bulk-rutile (TiO2) | <5 μm | 4.17 | 97 % rutile | 123 | 11.7 | ||
3 % anatase | 99 | ||||||
Nano-anatase (TiO2) | <25 nm | 45–55 | 3.9 | 100 % anatase | 10 | 7 | 154 |
Bulk-anatase (TiO2) | Not reported | 3.9 | 100 % anatase | 68 | 22.6 | ||
NIST 1898 (TiO2) | 37 ± 6 nm (rutile) | 55.55 ± 0.70 | 13 % rutile | 29 | 35 | 41.1 | |
(24 % rutile and 76 % anatase) | 19 ± 2 nm (anatase) | 87 % anatase | 19 | 81.0 |
aGreater uncertainty outside optimum range for Scherrer (1–65 nm, potentially extending to 100 nm)
bCalculated specific surface area assuming spherical particles of uniform size: SSA = 6/ρ/d (d = Scherrer diameter; ρ = density)
cManufacturer note that after sonication the material is disagglomerated into its primary nanoparticles of about 35 nm