Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 26;24(2):1553–1564. doi: 10.1007/s11356-016-7932-2

Table 2.

Dissolution results presented as concentration (mg/L or μg/L) and percent dissolved of nano- and bulk-ZnO and TiO2 samples at low pH (1.5) and neutral pH (pH 7) obtained with the short (2 h) assay (syringe filtration)

Description Bulk Nano Bulk vs nanob
Neutral pH
 Zn metal 7.02 ± 0.39 mg/L or 1.33 % 10.8 ± 0.50 mg/L or 2.05 % (<50 nm) p < 0.001
 ZnO 4.12 ± 0.21 mg/L or 0.95 % 7.85 ± 0.27 mg/L or 1.87 % (<100 nm) p < 0.0001
8.59 ± 0.45 mg/L or 2.13 % (<50 nm) p < 0.0001
 Rutile 0.146 ± 0.069 μg/L or 0.000048 % 0.210 ± 0.058 μg/L or 0.000066 % (<100 nm) p = 0.408
 Anatase 0.190 ± 0.075 μg/L or 0.000059 % 0.197 ± 0.069 μg/L or 0.000065 % (<25nm) p = 0.242
 Nist 1898a 0.128 ± 0.040 μg/L or 0.000041 %
Low pH
 Zn metal 92.3 ± 21.4 mg/L or 17.5 % 439.2 ± 24.4 mg/L or 80.8 % (<50 nm) p < 0.0001
 ZnO 368.7 ± 15.3 mg/L or 88.5 % 391.3 ± 5.11 mg/L or 97.0 % (<100 nm) p = 0.0098
379 ± 5.25 mg/L or 93.6 % (<50 nm) p = 0.128
 Rutile 0.282 ± 0.032 μg/L or 0.000092 % 0.505 ± 0.059 μg/L or 0.00016 % (<100 nm) p < 0.0001
 Anatase 58.5 ± 6.08 μg/L or 0.019 % 69.3 ± 6.44 μg/L or 0.022 % (<25 nm) p = 0.019
 Nist 1898 39.1 ± 3.65 μg/L or 0.012 %

Data are presented as mean and standard deviation of five independent replicates

a n = 3; bresults for bulk vs nano are significantly different when p < 0.05