Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 26;24(2):1553–1564. doi: 10.1007/s11356-016-7932-2

Table 4.

Placing solubility results from Table 2 into different grouping schemes shows the importance of specifying pH

4a
Test material Low pH Neutral pH
Bulk-Zn metal Biopersistent Biopersistent
Nano-Zn metal Soluble Biopersistent
Bulk-ZnO
Nano-ZnO100 nm Soluble Biopersistent
Nano-ZnO50 nm
Bulk-anatase
Nano-anatase Biopersistent Biopersistent
Bulk-rutile
Nano-rutile
4b
Solubility category Low pH Neutral pH
High solubility (>70 %) Bulk-ZnO (88.5 %)
Nano-ZnO100 nm (97 %)
Nano-ZnO50 nm (94 %)
Nano-Zn metal (80.8 %)
Moderate solubility (10–70 %) Bulk-Zn metal (17.5 %)
Low solubility (1–10 %) Nano-Zn metal (1.33 %)
Bulk-Zn metal (2.05 %)
Nano-ZnO50 nm (2.13 %)
Nano-ZnO100 nm (1.87 %)
Negligible solubility (<1 %) Bulk-ZnO (0.95 %)
Bulk-anatase (0.019 %) Bulk-anatase (<0.0001 %)
Nano-anatase (0.022 %) Nano-anatase (<0.0001 %)
Bulk-rutile (0.0001 %) Bulk-rutile (<0.0001 %)
Nano-rutile (0.0002 %) Nano-rutile (<0.0001 %)

Table 4a (top) uses 100 mg/L as the screening criterion; Table 4b (bottom) uses four categories of water solubility based on percentage (%M d/M o)