Table 6.
Strain | Day 21a | Day 60a | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LD50 | 95 % credible interval | LD50 | 95 % credible interval | |||
Lower | Upper | Lower | Upper | |||
Bp MSHR668 | 3.9 × 102 | 1.7 × 102 | 8.6 × 102 | 0.3 | 0 | 1.6 × 101 |
Bp 41-1 | 4.7 × 102 | 1.2 × 102 | 2.2 × 103 | 5.1 | 0.1 | 3.8 × 101 |
Bp 60-2 | 8.4 b | 0.7 | 4.3 × 101 | 3.4 | 0.5 | 1.2 × 101 |
Bp K96243 | 2.3 × 104 | 1.2 × 104 | 4.7 × 104 | 1.9 × 103 | 4.7 × 102 | 6.1 × 103 |
Bp 49-4 | 4.3 × 104 | 2.3 × 104 | 7.7 × 104 | 1.9 × 10 2c | 0.4 | 2.2 × 103 |
Bp 1106a | 3.3 × 104 | 1.7 × 104 | 6.4 × 104 | 1.2 × 104 | 3.3 × 103 | 4.0 × 104 |
Bp 62-3 | 4.7 × 104 | 1.9 × 104 | 1.2 × 105 | 1.2 × 104 | 7.0 × 103 | 2.0 × 104 |
Bm FMH | 3.3 × 107 | 1.4 × 107 | 7.6 × 107 | 1.1 × 107 | 2.1 × 106 | 7.2 × 107 |
Bm 60-5 | 2.1 × 107 | 1.2 × 107 | 3.7 × 107 | 2.9 × 10 6d | 7.7 × 105 | 1.2 × 107 |
aBALB/c mice were challenged by the IP route with a strain of Bp or Bm, or a spleen isolate of the strain, and the mice were monitored for morbidity and mortality for 60 days. The 21- and 60-day survival data were analyzed for each strain, and the data were evaluated statistically to compare parent strain and spleen derivative relative virulence potencies and LD50 values (no. CFU) by using Bayesian probit analysis, as described in the methods. The bolded LD50 values are those which were significantly different from the parent strain LD50 value
bThe day 21 LD50 value of Bp 60-2 was less than that of parent strain MSHR668 (probability ≥95 %) and the isolate exhibited greater potency at all lethal doses up to 90 % (probability of mortality ≤0.9)
cThe day 21 LD50 values of K96243 and its isolate Bp 49-4 were not significantly different. The day 60 LD50 of the isolate was about tenfold less than that of the parent, although not significantly different
dAlthough the day 60 LD50 for isolate Bm 60-5 was almost fourfold less than that of the parent strain, the values were not significantly different