Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 13;17:51. doi: 10.1186/s12862-017-0893-3

Table 2.

Evidence of positive selection identified by different methods in Hyphy

Gene SLAC (P > 0.8) FEL (P > 0.8) REL (PP > 50) Fubar (PP > 0.8) Branch-site REL
Hba 35 (0.134), 73 (0.199), 109 (0.133) 35 (0.058), 73 (0.077), 79 (0.111), 83 (0.132), 109 (0.073) 35 (60.944), 73 (60.689), 83 (50.668), 109 (84.333) 35 (0.909), 73 (0.840), 79 (0.940), 109 (0.824) E.electricus: p = 0.007
Hbb 123 (0.197), 133 (0.154) 15 (0.093), 45 (0.146), 81 (0.127), 106 (0.164), 112 (0.162), 123 (0.072), 133 (0.067), 144 (0.100) 123 (60.003), 133 (1832.56) 15 (0.818), 81 (0.874), 111 (0.899), 123 (0.854), 133 (0.979), 144 (0.921) B.gauderio: p = 0.003;
E.virescens: p = 0.037
Mb 27 (0.097), 98 (0.096) 27 (0.021), 92 (0.110), 98 (0.029), 108 (0.131) 27 (337.517), 98 (94.269) 27 (0.973), 44 (0.849), 92 (0.849), 98 (0.925) E.electricus: p = 0.005
B.gauderio: p = 0.017

Note: Codons identified by more than one ML method are underlined. Sites also detected by M8 model are shown in bold. Site positions were relative to Zebrafish (Danio rerio) protein sequences, i.e., Mb (Q6VN46), Hba (Q90487), Hbb (Q90486), and Ngb (Q90YJ2) in UniProtKB