Table 2.
Dimensions | Naive elimination | Selective elimination | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Lumping error (ε) | Stiffness | Lumping error (ε) | Stiffness | |
6 | 1.37% | 876.73 | 0.15% | 794.91 |
5 | 2.45% | 904.80 | 0.51% | 56.22 |
4 | 4.8% | 907.59 | 0.54% | 60.16 |
3 | 74.18% | 542.24 | 4.77% | 58.95 |
2 | 339.99% | 99.32 | 12.88% | 25.95 |
1 | 424.33% | 1 | 75.56% | 1 |
This table compares the effect of either naively or rigorously selecting which species to eliminate via the application of conservation relations. The errors stated represent the maximal relative error between the original and reduced systems when simulated to steady-state under the introduction of 10μ M concentration of attractant ligand at t=0