Table 1.
Spearman and Pearson correlation coefficients between similarity value and absolute annotation size as well as between variance in similarity value and annotation size
| Similarity measure | Spearman | Pearson | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yeast | Synthetic GO | Synthetic HPO | Yeast | Synthetic GO | Synthetic GO | |||||||
| Average | Variance | Average | Variance | Average | Variance | Average | Variance | Average | Variance | Average | Variance | |
| GIC (Graph Information Content) | 0.929780 | 0.251586 | 0.970924 | –0.773449 | 0.953247 | –0.980159 | 0.861348 | 0.117734 | 0.831167 | –0.744321 | 0.802873 | –0.958817 |
| NTO (Normalized Term Overlap) | 0.178345 | –0.860012 | 0.248990 | –0.976335 | 0.123304 | –0.988240 | –0.014072 | –0.682683 | –0.009088 | –0.574883 | –0.158914 | –0.593458 |
| UI (Union Intersection) | 0.892631 | 0.298097 | 0.879582 | –0.934921 | 0.729942 | –0.995599 | 0.788675 | 0.030649 | 0.777515 | –0.914405 | 0.736711 | –0.935415 |
| BMA with Jiang, Conrath 1997 | 0.960133 | –0.892027 | 0.998773 | –0.993506 | 0.999351 | –0.996609 | 0.892576 | –0.812184 | 0.895020 | –0.629497 | 0.907974 | –0.692269 |
| BMA with Lin 1998 | 0.980519 | –0.800362 | 0.998918 | –0.994733 | 0.999134 | –0.998052 | 0.925181 | –0.772250 | 0.896497 | –0.638574 | 0.917599 | –0.677309 |
| BMA with Resnik 1995 | 0.980519 | –0.717457 | 0.998773 | –0.994228 | 0.998918 | –0.998124 | 0.939044 | –0.703981 | 0.895107 | –0.642652 | 0.917738 | –0.675426 |
| BMA with Schlicker 2006 | 0.980519 | –0.800362 | 0.998918 | –0.994733 | 0.999134 | –0.998052 | 0.925181 | –0.772250 | 0.896497 | –0.638574 | 0.917599 | –0.677309 |