Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan;107(1):147–155. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303520

TABLE 4—

Multivariate Logistic Regressions Associated With Servicewomen Experiencing Sexual Assault in the Military (SAIM) While Not Deployed: March 2010–December 2011

Variable NCO Leadership Behaviors Factor Score Model, OR (95% CI) CO Leadership Behaviors Factor Score Model, OR (95% CI)
Behavior factor scores 2.0 (1.6, 2.6) 2.0 (1.5, 2.5)
Sociodemographic characteristics
Current marital status
 Single (Ref) 1 1
 Married or living with partner 0.6 (0.4, 0.9) 0.6 (0.4, 1.0)
 Divorced or widowed 1.4 (0.8, 2.5) 1.5 (0.9, 2.6)
Military characteristics
Service component
 RNG (Ref) 1 1
 AC 2.3 (1.6, 3.4) 2.5 (1.7, 3.7)
Rank
 Junior enlisted (Ref) 1 1
 NCO 2.3 (1.4, 3.8) 2.1 (1.3, 3.5)
 CO 1.3 (0.8, 2.3) 1.2 (0.7, 2.1)
Sexual assault history
Premilitary sexual assault 2.1 (1.4, 3.1) 2.1 (1.4, 3.2)
Deployed SAIMa 2.8 (1.2, 6.4) 3.5 (1.6, 7.7)
Leadership factor scores
Factor 1: negative NCO behaviors 1.9 (1.4, 2.4) . . .
Factor 2: negative CO behaviors . . . 1.8 (1.4, 2.4)

Note. AC = active component; CI = confidence interval; CO = commissioned officer; NCO = noncommissioned officer; OR = odds ratio; RNG = Reserve–National Guard. The sample size was n = 1330. Eligible participants were veteran servicewomen who served during Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom any point from October 2001 to the time of the interview. Data were collected March 2010–December 2011.

a

Servicewomen were asked about leadership behaviors specific to nondeployed locations and current service (i.e., AC or RNG). This includes all servicewomen who experienced SAIM in a nondeployed location (i.e., not while deployed) for their most recent service (AC or RNG).