Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan;107(1):159–165. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303522

TABLE 2—

Comparison of Behavioral Outcomes Between Intervention and Control Groups at 6 Months: Baltimore, MD–Washington, DC, Metropolitan Area, 2010–2014

Test Intervention Group,a No. (%) Control Group,a No. (%) Difference Between Groups, % OR (95% CI)b
Mammogram (n = 399) 111/198 (56.1) 20/201 (10.0) 46.1 18.5 (9.2, 37.4)
Pap test (n = 497) 134/246 (54.5) 23/251 (9.2) 45.3 13.3 (7.9, 22.3)
Both tests (n = 336) 77/166 (46.4) 11/170 (6.5) 39.9 17.4 (7.5, 40.3)

Note. CI = confidence interval; OR = odds ratio; Pap = Papanicolaou.

a

Estimated from generalized estimating equations model accounting for clustering within a church and adjusting for age, insurance, English proficiency, years of US residence, years of education, employment, and family history of breast cancer.

b

Women who were missing their screening status at follow-up were assumed to have not undergone screening.