Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 6;7(38):62676–62686. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.10445

Table 4. Multivariate analysis of probable prognostic factors in disease free survival.

Variables LRFS DMFS DFS
HR 95% CI P HR 95% CI P HR 95% CI P
Distance from anal verge
≤ 5 cm vs. > 5cm
- 1.28 0.53-3.11 0.58 0.96 0.42-2.21 0.93
Pathologic node stage
N1 vs. N2
3.48 1.03-11.70 0.04 1.36 0.69-2.69 0.38 1.90 1.04-3.47 0.04
Type of surgery
LAR vs. APR
- 2.18 0.87-5.49 0.10 2.73 1.14-6.56 0.02
Lymphovascular invasion
No vs. Yes
2.78 0.91-8.49 0.07 - -
P53
≤20 vs. >20
- 1.86 0.92-3.77 0.08 1.54 0.83-2.89 0.17
Nuclear survivin
≤80 vs. >80
3.23 1.06-9.81 0.04 2.11 1.08-4.12 0.03 2.46 1.35-4.45 0.003
Cytoplasmic survivin
≤80 vs. >80
- 2.65 1.35-5.20 0.005 2.16 1.17-4.00 0.01

Abbreviations. HR, hazard ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; AJCC, American Joint Committee on Cancer; LAR, low anterior resection; APR, abdomino-perineal resection.

Multivariate analysis was performed with only significant prognostic factors in the univariate analysis (LRFS: Pathologic node stage, Lymphovascular invasion, Nuclear survivin; DMFS: Distance from anal verge, Pathologic node stage, Type of surgery, P53, Nuclear survivin, Cytoplasmic survivin; DFS: Distance from anal verge, Pathologic node stage, Type of surgery, P53, Nuclear survivin, Cytoplasmic survivin).