Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Feb 14.
Published in final edited form as: Circulation. 2016 Dec 28;135(7):671–682. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.021724

Table 4.

Logistic Regression Analysis with Generalized Estimating Equations of Brain Abnormalities (Only significant differences are shown)

Endpoints Odds ratio (95% CI) P value
Non-acute Ischemic T2 Changes 0.0001
BDG vs. pre-BDG 8.75 (3.173, 24.150) <0.0001
Fontan vs. pre-BDG 6.16 (2.007, 18.916) 0.0015
Fontan vs. BDG 0.70 (0.418, 1.185) 0.1866
PVL 0.0002
BDG vs. pre- BDG 3.68 (1.834, 7.383) 0.0002
Fontan vs. pre- BDG 2.00 (0.896, 4.462) 0.0905
Fontan vs. BDG 0.54 (0.329, 0.899) 0.0175
Ventriculomegaly
Yes vs. No 0.0237
BDG vs. pre- BDG 2.84 (1.342, 6.028) 0.0064
Fontan vs. pre- BDG 2.53 (1.205, 5.319) 0.0142
Fontan vs. BDG 0.89 (0.667, 1.187) 0.4269
SWI veins
Borderline versus Normal 0.0008
BDG vs. pre- BDG 0.48 (0.055, 4.229) 0.5099
Fontan vs. pre- BDG 0.12 (0.014, 1.077) 0.0583
Fontan vs. BDG 0.25 (0.119, 0.543) 0.0004
Prominent versus Normal <0.0001
BDG vs. pre- BDG 0.02 (0.003, 0.179) 0.0004
Fontan vs. pre- BDG 0.01 (0.001, 0.043) <0.0001
Fontan vs. BDG 0.23 (0.096, 0.557) 0.0011
Prominent versus Borderline <0.0001
BDG vs. pre-BDG 0.05 (0.016, 0.127) <0.0001
Fontan vs. pre-BDG 0.04 (0.011, 0.142) <0.0001
Fontan vs. BDG 0.88 (0.351, 2.221) 0.7911