Table 4.
Effects of IM on ratings by research fidelity.
| Analysis category | k | n | Impact of IM on ratings | % var | 80% CV | 95% CI | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| obs-r | SDr | rc | SDrc | Lower | Upper | Lower | Upper | ||||
| Interview | 32 | 3,792 | 0.16 | 0.16 | 0.22 | 0.22 | 0.17 | −0.07 | 0.50 | 0.14 | 0.29 |
| Lab | 21 | 2,492 | 0.16 | 0.18 | 0.24 | 0.25 | 0.13 | −0.09 | 0.56 | 0.13 | 0.34 |
| Self-focused | 14 | 1,671 | 0.19 | 0.20 | 0.28 | 0.27 | 0.11 | −0.07 | 0.63 | 0.13 | 0.42 |
| Other-focused | 7 | 821 | 0.12 | 0.14 | 0.15 | 0.18 | 0.26 | −0.08 | 0.38 | 0.01 | 0.28 |
| Field | 11 | 1,300 | 0.14 | 0.12 | 0.18 | 0.14 | 0.44 | 0.00 | 0.36 | 0.09 | 0.26 |
| Self-focused | 6 | 844 | 0.14 | 0.13 | 0.16 | 0.16 | 0.28 | −0.04 | 0.37 | 0.04 | 0.29 |
| Other-focused | 5 | 456 | 0.15 | 0.09 | 0.20 | 0.09 | 1.46 | 0.09 | 0.32 | 0.13 | 0.28 |
| Job performance | 10 | 4,843 | 0.21 | 0.10 | 0.24 | 0.11 | 0.17 | 0.10 | 0.38 | 0.17 | 0.31 |
| Lab | 1 | 87 | 0.24 | – | 0.29 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Self-focused | 1 | 87 | 0.24 | – | 0.29 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Other-focused | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Field | 9 | 4,756 | 0.21 | 0.10 | 0.24 | 0.11 | 0.16 | 0.10 | 0.38 | 0.17 | 0.31 |
| Self-focused | 5 | 643 | 0.09 | 0.23 | 0.16 | 0.28 | 0.10 | −0.20 | 0.52 | −0.09 | 0.41 |
| Other-focused | 4 | 4,113 | 0.23 | 0.03 | 0.25 | 0.02 | 2.07 | 0.23 | 0.28 | 0.23 | 0.28 |
k, number of correlations; n, number of subjects for analysis of correlations; obs-r, observed sample-weighted mean correlation; SDr, observed sample-weighted mean standard deviation; rc, sample-weighted mean correlation corrected for criterion unreliability; SDrc, sample-weighted mean standard deviation corrected for criterion unreliability; % var, percent variance explained by artifacts; CV, credibility value; CI, confidence interval. A dash (–) in the table indicates data was not available.