Table 8.

Effects of IM on ratings by research participant.

Analysis category	k	n	Impact of IM on ratings				% var	80% CV		95% CI
			obs-r	SDr	rc	SDrc		Lower	Upper	Lower	Upper
Interviewa	32	3,792	0.16	0.16	0.22	0.22	0.17	−0.07	0.50	0.14	0.29
Labor market participant	10	1,162	0.26	0.13	0.36	0.17	0.30	0.15	0.58	0.26	0.47
Self-focused	8	938	0.29	0.12	0.39	0.18	0.28	0.16	0.61	0.27	0.51
Other-focused	2	224	0.16	0.11	0.25	0.06	2.38	0.17	0.33	0.16	0.33
Student	21	2,446	0.10	0.16	0.15	0.22	0.18	−0.14	0.43	0.05	0.24
Self-focused	12	1,577	0.10	0.17	0.15	0.24	0.13	−0.16	0.46	0.01	0.29
Other-focused	9	869	0.11	0.14	0.14	0.18	0.32	−0.09	0.37	0.02	0.26
Job performance	10	4,843	0.21	0.10	0.24	0.11	0.17	0.10	0.38	0.17	0.31
Labor market participant	10	4,843	0.21	0.10	0.24	0.11	0.17	0.10	0.38	0.17	0.31
Self-focused	6	730	0.11	0.22	0.18	0.27	0.11	−0.17	0.52	−0.04	0.39
Other-focused	4	4,113	0.23	0.03	0.25	0.02	2.07	0.23	0.28	0.23	0.28
Student	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Self-focused	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Other-focused	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–

k, number of correlations; n, number of subjects for analysis of correlations; obs-r, observed sample-weighted mean correlation; SDr, observed sample-weighted mean standard deviation; r_c, sample-weighted mean correlation corrected for criterion unreliability; SDr_c, sample-weighted mean standard deviation corrected for criterion unreliability; % var, percent variance explained by artifacts; CV, credibility value; CI, confidence interval. A dash (–) in the table indicates data was not available.

^aOne study that met this criterion was missing data and could not be included in the moderation analysis.