Table 8.
Analysis category | k | n | Impact of IM on ratings | % var | 80% CV | 95% CI | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
obs-r | SDr | rc | SDrc | Lower | Upper | Lower | Upper | ||||
Interviewa | 32 | 3,792 | 0.16 | 0.16 | 0.22 | 0.22 | 0.17 | −0.07 | 0.50 | 0.14 | 0.29 |
Labor market participant | 10 | 1,162 | 0.26 | 0.13 | 0.36 | 0.17 | 0.30 | 0.15 | 0.58 | 0.26 | 0.47 |
Self-focused | 8 | 938 | 0.29 | 0.12 | 0.39 | 0.18 | 0.28 | 0.16 | 0.61 | 0.27 | 0.51 |
Other-focused | 2 | 224 | 0.16 | 0.11 | 0.25 | 0.06 | 2.38 | 0.17 | 0.33 | 0.16 | 0.33 |
Student | 21 | 2,446 | 0.10 | 0.16 | 0.15 | 0.22 | 0.18 | −0.14 | 0.43 | 0.05 | 0.24 |
Self-focused | 12 | 1,577 | 0.10 | 0.17 | 0.15 | 0.24 | 0.13 | −0.16 | 0.46 | 0.01 | 0.29 |
Other-focused | 9 | 869 | 0.11 | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.18 | 0.32 | −0.09 | 0.37 | 0.02 | 0.26 |
Job performance | 10 | 4,843 | 0.21 | 0.10 | 0.24 | 0.11 | 0.17 | 0.10 | 0.38 | 0.17 | 0.31 |
Labor market participant | 10 | 4,843 | 0.21 | 0.10 | 0.24 | 0.11 | 0.17 | 0.10 | 0.38 | 0.17 | 0.31 |
Self-focused | 6 | 730 | 0.11 | 0.22 | 0.18 | 0.27 | 0.11 | −0.17 | 0.52 | −0.04 | 0.39 |
Other-focused | 4 | 4,113 | 0.23 | 0.03 | 0.25 | 0.02 | 2.07 | 0.23 | 0.28 | 0.23 | 0.28 |
Student | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
Self-focused | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
Other-focused | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
k, number of correlations; n, number of subjects for analysis of correlations; obs-r, observed sample-weighted mean correlation; SDr, observed sample-weighted mean standard deviation; rc, sample-weighted mean correlation corrected for criterion unreliability; SDrc, sample-weighted mean standard deviation corrected for criterion unreliability; % var, percent variance explained by artifacts; CV, credibility value; CI, confidence interval. A dash (–) in the table indicates data was not available.
One study that met this criterion was missing data and could not be included in the moderation analysis.