Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 7;595(4):1305–1314. doi: 10.1113/JP273137

Table 1.

MEP amplitude and stimulation intensity before and after reboxetine (RBX) administration

Stimulation TMS parameter Drug Condition Baseline 1 Baseline 2 Baseline 3 P
Anodal MEP (mV) PLC 1.04 ± 0.12 0.98 ± 0.09 0.99 ± 0.06 0.396
Acute RBX 1.01 ± 0.03 0.95 ± 0.18 1.03 ± 0.16 0.153
Chronic RBX 1.04 ± 0.11 1.07 ± 0.08 1 ± 0.07 0.357
% MSO PLC 52 ± 8.07 52 ± 8.07 50.3 ± 6.74 0.178
Acute RBX 52.9 ± 7.11 52.9 ± 7.11 53.1 ± 7.56 0.445
Chronic RBX 52.1 ± 7.18 52.1 ± 7.18 51.4 ± 8.5 0.325
Cathodal MEP (mV) PLC 1.03 ± 0.14 0.99 ± 0.12 1.01 ± 0.09 0.517
Acute RBX 1.01 ± 0.13 0.97 ± 0.09 0.99 ± 0.08 0.946
Chronic RBX 0.94 ± 0.06 1.03 ± 0.12 1 ± 0.09 0.063
% MSO PLC 52.9 ± 7.54 52.9 ± 7.54 53.3 ± 8.09 0.801
Acute RBX 51.6 ± 6.19 51.6 ± 6.19 51.3 ± 7.43 0.163
Chronic RBX 51.9 ± 7.62 51.9 ± 7.62 51.3 ± 7.6 0.096

Shown are the mean MEP amplitudes ± SD and stimulation intensity (percentage of maximum stimulator output, %MSO) mean ± SD of baseline 1, 2 and 3. The intensity of TMS was determined to elicit MEPs with a peak to peak amplitude of ∼1 mV (baseline 1). A second baseline (baseline 2) was recorded 2 h after medication intake to determine the effect of the drug on cortical excitability and adjusted if necessary (baseline 3). Student's t tests revealed no significant differences between conditions (P > 0.05).