Table 4.
Pearson coefficient r | P value | ||
---|---|---|---|
Anodal stimulation | Sham | −0.142 | 0.551 |
0.5 mA | −0.182 | 0.442 | |
1.0 mA | −0.474 | 0.035* | |
1.5 mA | 0.405 | 0.076 | |
2.0 mA | 0.081 | 0.773 | |
Cathodal stimulation | Sham | −0.032 | 0.900 |
0.5 mA | 0.354 | 0.150 | |
1.0 mA | −0.042 | 0.869 | |
1.5 mA | −0.287 | 0.248 | |
2.0 mA | −0.277 | 0.267 |
Pearson's correlation coefficient was calculated for each intensity using each subject's respective SI1mV as one variable and the grand‐averaged, normalized MEP from the early epoch (0–30 min post stimulation) as the second variable. A significant negative correlation was observed for 1.0 mA anodal stimulation only.