Table 3.
Stress-shielding, cortical hypertrophy, and Harris Hip Score analyzed in different CCD categories (A–E)
| CCD category | n | Stress-shielding | Cortical hypertrophy | Harris Hip Score | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | Stdev | Median | 95% CI | |||||
| A (7.0%) | 14 | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 96.79 | 9.23 | 100 | 91.45 | 102.10 |
| B (22.4%) | 45 | 1 (2.2%) | 2 (4.4%) | 98.09 | 4.57 | 100 | 96.72 | 99.46 |
| C (43.3%) | 87 | 4 (4.6%) | 3 (3.4%) | 98.60 | 3.48 | 100 | 97.86 | 99.34 |
| D (20.9%) | 42 | 1 (2.4%) | 3 (7.1%) | 97.83 | 4.81 | 100 | 96.33 | 99.33 |
| E (6.5%) | 13 | 2 (15.4%) | 1 (7.7%) | 97.92 | 2.53 | 99 | 96.39 | 99.45 |
| Total (100.0%) | 201 | 8 (4.0%) | 9 (4.5%) | 98.15 | 4.55 | 100 | 97.52 | 98.79 |
| Chi-square-statistics (df = 4) p = 0.220 | Chi-square-statistics (df = 4) p = 0.757 | Kruskal–Wallis test (df = 4): p = 0.458 | ||||||