Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Gastroenterology and Hepatology From Bed to Bench logoLink to Gastroenterology and Hepatology From Bed to Bench
. 2016 Dec;9(Suppl1):S70–S74.

First report of Tasmanian sheep strain (G2) genotype isolated from Iranian goat using the high resolution melting (HRM) analysis

Ahmad Hosseini-Safa 1, Mohammad Ali Mohag, hegh 2, Nader Pestechian 2, Maryam Ganji 3, Rasoul Mohammadi 2, Reza Mahmoudi Lamouki 4, Mohammad Rostami-Nejad 5
PMCID: PMC5310803  PMID: 28224031

Abstract

Aim:

The present study was aimed to evaluate E. granulosus genotypes isolated from goats using HRM analysis in Isfahan province.

Background:

Cystic echincoccosis, so-called hydatidosis, is widespread infection caused by the larval stage of Echinococcus granulosus. This is an important zoonotic disease worldwide, especially in the developing countries such as Iran. To date, molecular studies mainly based on the mitochondrial DNA sequences have identified distinct genotypes termed G1-G10 which can differ in some characteristics such as the growth and infectivity to different intermediate hosts or the survival rate in the definitive hosts that are important for the development of control strategies.

Methods:

From August to December 2014, 1341 goats were investigated and hydatid cysts were collected from the liver and lungs of 43 infected goats in Isfahan province abattoirs, Isfahan, Iran. Total genomic DNA was extracted from each sample, amplified for the presence of polymorphism of mitochondrial gene coding for cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (CO1), using high resolution melting curve (HRM) method.

Results:

the results of HRM analysis using the sequence of CO1 gene for 43 Echinococcus granulosus isolates from goats showed 31, 2 and 10 isolates were identified as G1, G2, and G3 genotypes, respectively.

Conclusion:

G1 is the predominant genotype in the isolated goat samples in Isfahan province, and the presence of G2 strain was reported for the first time in goat in Iran.

Key Words: Echinococcus granulosus, G2 genotype, HRM, goat, Iran

Introduction

Infection of humans and animals with the cestode Echinococcus granulosus (E. granulosus), so-called hydatidosis, is one of the most important and prevalent parasitic diseases in different parts of Iran (1-3). E. granulosus in the domestic animals is detected only at the time of post-mortem inspection at the slaughterhouse. It can cause economic losses in livestock as well as high mortality in humans (4,5). The prevalence of adult worms has been reported from dogs, wolves and jackals in the Middle East and Iran (6). In addition to humans, sheep, goats, buffaloes, camels, horses, cattle and pigs are as intermediate hosts of Echinococcus spp. Metacestode stage of the parasite is routinely found in the viscera of the mentioned animals, especially in their liver and lung (1,7). E. granulosus shows a wide range of intra-specific variation related to host specificity, biology, morphology, epidemiology and genetics (8). To date, molecular studies mainly based on the mitochondrial DNA sequences have identified 10 distinct genotypes termed G1- G10 (9,10). Different genotypes have been known as sheep strain (G1), Tasmanian sheep strain (G2), buffalo strain (G3), horse strain (G4), cattle strain (G5), camel strain (G6), pig strain (G7), cervid strain (G8), human polish strain (G9), and Fennoscanadian cervid strains (G10) (11). All defined genotypes were divided into five species:

E. granulosus sensustricto (G1-G3), E. equinus (G4), E. ortleppi (G5), E. canadensis (G6, G7, G8 and G10) and E. felides (G9) (12,13). These genotypes can differ in some characteristics such as the growth and infectivity to different intermediate hosts or the survival rate in the definitive hosts that are important for the development of control strategies (14).

The Iranian Veterinary Organization (IVO) reported that the population of goats is estimated to be 25,800,000 (15). The prevalence of hydatid cysts in goats has been reported in Iran from 1.7 to 29.4% (16-19). Molecular identification using nested PCR, PCR-RFLP and real-time PCR has widely been used for the detection of E. granulosus genetic variations (20,21). The present study was aimed to evaluate the E. granulosus genotypes in the samples isolated from goats using high resolution melting curve (HRM) analysis in Isfahan province located in the center of Iran.

Materials and Methods

Sample collection

From August to December 2014, 1341 goats were examined and hydatid cysts were collected from the liver and lungs of 43 infected goats in Isfahan province abattoirs, Iran. Out of 43 samples infected with hydatid cyst, 37 were fertile and 7 were infertile. All hydatid cysts were obtained under sterile condition, and then protoscolices and/or the germinal layer were collected from an individual hydatid cyst. In order to perform molecular analysis, the protoscolices and germinal was performed using Mini Opticon real-time PCR detection system (Rotor-Gene 6000, Germany) in a volume of 25 µL containing 10 µLmaster mix (HRM PCR Kit, Qiagen, 100 Germany), 10 µL distilled water, 1 µL each primer with 10 pmol/ul concentration volume and 4 µL template DNA under the following thermal profile: 10 min at 95 °C for initial denaturation followed by 40 cycles at 95°C for 10s for denaturation, 55 °C for 15 s for annealing and 72 °C for 27 s for extension and a final extension step at 72°C for 5 min. After an initial step of 95 °C for 3 min and 40 °C for 1 min, melting curve was obtained by increasing the temperature from 65°C to 85°C at intervals of 0.2 °C per 2s.

DNA sequencing and phylogenetic analysis

To confirm the identified genotypes, 6 samples of different curve were randomly sequenced for cox1. The obtained sequences were compared with previously published sequences of the mitochondrial CO1 gene for E. granulosus genotypes in NCBI using basic local alignment search tool (BLAST) system. Phylogenetic analyses of the sequence data were inferred with maximum likelihood using the Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (Mega5) software package (version 5.2.1, 2013) (23-25).

Results

Out of 43 hydatid cysts isolated, 28 of them were collected from liver and 15 from lungs; 37 cysts were fertile and 7 infertile. All the isolates identified by HRM were clustered along with the corresponding reference genotypes as shown in Figure 1. HRM analysis using the sequence of CO1 gene for 43 E. granulosus isolates from goats showed G1 genotype was identified in 31 and G3 in 10 isolates. For the first time G2 genotype was detected in the 2 collected isolates (Figure 2).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Molecular phylogenetic tree of 10 E. granulosus isolates of goat along with reference isolates based on CO1 gene sequence. The evolutionary history was inferred by using the Maximum Likelihood method based on the Kimura 2 parameter model (23). The tree with the highest log likelihood (-814.2241) is shown. Reference accession nos.: G1, M64661; G2, M64662; G3, M64663; G6, M84666

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

HRM based on (EVA Green-TM) curve analyses of E. granulosus identified by sequencing (A-C). (A) G1, (B) G3, and (C) G2 genotype

layer were stored in 70% ethanol at -20 ˚C until DNA Also, T analysis was used for the detection of E. granulosus extraction.

DNA extraction

The samples were rinsed three times with sterile distilled water to remove the ethanol prior to DNA extraction. Total genomic DNA was extracted using the genomic DNA extraction kit (Bioneer, Daejeon, Korea) according to the manufacturer’s instructions with some modifications. Concentration of DNA was determined by Nano Drop and then samples were stored at -20 ˚C until DNA amplification.

DNA amplification and melting curve (HRM) analysis

The template for amplification was the mitochondrial sequences coding for cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (CO1) gene. The amplification was carried out by real- time PCR using the following primers: forward JB3 (5´-TTTTTTGGGCATCCTGAGGTTTAT-3´) and reverse JB4.5 (5´-TAAAGAAAGAACATAATGAAAATG-3´)

described by Bowles et al. in 1992 (22). The PCR reaction genotypes (G1, G2 and G3 genotypes) in goats in Isfahan province, Iran (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Tm of the analyzed hydatid cysts. (A) E. granulosus G1 identified by sequencing, (B) E. granulosus G3 identified by sequencing, and (C) E. granulosus G2 identified by sequencing.

Discussion

HRM is a reliable, less time-consuming and cost-effective technique for identification of helminthic parasites that can be, so effective and beneficial for genotyping E. granulosus (26,27). In the present study, the CO1 gene was used to identification of E. granulosus genotypes. CO1 gene is one of the best targets to discriminate strains, genotypes and microvariants of Echinococcus spp. (28,29). A few studies have been done on the genotypes of E. granulosus on goats in Iran (15,30). In the present study, molecular results of the samples isolated from goats demonstrated the presence of three E. granulosus strains, including the common sheep strain (G1), Tasmanian sheep strain (G2) and buffalo strain (G3). We isolated G2 strain by using HRM analysis for the first time on livestock in Iran. The G2 genotype occurred in two liver samples of goats. In two previous studies, G2 strain was isolated from human and dog in Iran (31,32). In the other countries, the G2 strain was isolated from cattle in Italy and sheep in Argentina (33,34). Out of 43 samples from goats, 31 isolates (72.1%) were G1 genotype (sheep strain). The G1 genotype is the dominant strain in both human and animals in Iran and the world (35).

In all studies carried out on goats in Iran, G1 genotype was isolated (36) that is evidence for the goat is a good intermediate host for the sheep strain. In the present study, G3 genotype (buffalo strain) was isolated from 10 (23.2%). G3 genotype has been reported in the intermediate hosts including sheep, goat, cattle, pigs, and human, and definitive hosts in Iran and other countries such as India, Turkey, Pakistan, Italy and Greece (10,37). In a similar study on goats in Isfahan, G3 genotype in 25% of cases was observed using CO1 fragment (38), but in studies on the hydatid cysts isolated from goats in Mazandaran and Lorestan provinces, as well as Varamin city in Iran, G3 genotype was not found (30,36). These findings indicate that the goats can be important intermediate host for of the analyzed hydatid cysts. (A) E. granulosus G1 identified by sequencing, (B) E. granulosus G3 identified by sequencing, and (C) E. granulosus G2 identified by sequencing.

In conclusion, HRM analysis is a reliable and rapid technique for screening and discrimination of different species and genotypes within E. granulosus. G1 is predominant genotype in goats in Isfahan province, but the presence of G2 strain was detected for the first time in livestock in this area and should be noted in the intermediate hosts.

Acknowledgments

This paper was extracted from MSC thesis of Ahmad Hosseini-Safa.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no financial or personal relationship with other people or organizations that could inappropriately influence or bias this paper.

References

  • 1.Rostami Nejad M, Nazemalhosseini Mojarad E, Nochi Z, Fasihi Harandi M, Cheraghipour K, Mowlavi GR, et al. Echinococcusgranulosus strain differentiation in Iran based on sequence heterogeneity in the mitochondrial 12SrRNA gene. J Helminthol. 2008;82:343–7. doi: 10.1017/S0022149X0804594X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Rostami Nejad M, Taghipour N, Nochi Z, Nazemalhosseini Mojarad E, Mohebbi SR, Fasihi Harandi M, et al. Molecular identification of animal isolates of Echinococcus granulosus from Iran using four mitochondrial genes. J Helminthol. 2012;86:485–92. doi: 10.1017/S0022149X1100071X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Dalimi A, Motamedi G, Hosseini M, Mohammadian B, Malaki H, Ghamari Z, et al. Echinococcosis/hydatidosis in western Iran. Vet Parasitol. 2002;105:161–71. doi: 10.1016/s0304-4017(02)00005-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Singh BB, Sharma JK, Tuli A, Sharma R, Bal MS, Aulakh RS, et al. Prevalence and morphological characterisation of Echinococcusgranulosus from north India. J Parasit Dis. 2014;38:36–40. doi: 10.1007/s12639-012-0189-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ahmadi N, Meshkehkar M. An abattoir-based study on the prevalence and economic losses due to cystic Echinococcosis in slaughtered herbivores in Ahwaz, south-western Iran. J Helminthol. 2011;85:33–9. doi: 10.1017/S0022149X10000234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sharbatkhori M, Mirhendi H, Harandi MF, Rezaeian M, Mohebali M, Eshraghian M, et al. Echinococcus granulosus genotypes in livestock of Iran indicating high frequency of G1 genotype in camels. Exp Parasitol. 2010;124:373–9. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2009.11.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Thompson R, McManus DP. Towards a taxonomic revision of the genus Echinococcus. Trends Parasitol. 2002;18:452–7. doi: 10.1016/s1471-4922(02)02358-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Thompson R. The taxonomy, phylogeny and transmission of Echinococcus. Exp Parasitol. 2008;119:439–46. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2008.04.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lavikainen A, Lehtinen M, Meri T, Hirvelä-Koski V, Meri S. Molecular genetic characterization of the Fennoscandian cervid strain, a new genotypic group (G10) of Echinococcus granulosus. Parasitology. 2003;127:207–15. doi: 10.1017/s0031182003003780. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sharbatkhori M, Harandi MF, Mirhendi H, Hajialilo E, Kia EB. Sequence analysis of cox1 and nad1 genes in Echinococcusgranulosus G3 genotype in camels (Camelus dromedarius) from central Iran. Parasitol Res. 2011;108:521–7. doi: 10.1007/s00436-010-2092-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Grosso G, Gruttadauria S, Biondi A, Marventano S. Mistretta Worldwide epidemiology of liver hydatidosis including the Mediterranean area. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18:1425. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i13.1425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Nakao M, Lavikainen A, Yanagida T, Ito A. Phylogenetic systematics of the genus Echinococcus (Cestoda: Taeniidae) Int J Parasitol. 2013;43:1017–29. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2013.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hüttner M, Nakao M, Wassermann T, Siefert L, Boomker JD, Dinkel A, et al. Genetic characterization and phylogenetic position of Echinococcus felidis (Cestoda: Taeniidae) from the African lion. Int J Parasitol. 2008;38:861–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2007.10.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Soriano S, Pierangeli N, Pianciola L, Mazzeo M, Lazzarini L, Saiz M, et al. Molecular characterization of Echinococcus isolates indicates goats as reservoir for Echinococcus canadensis G6 genotype in Neuquén, Patagonia Argentina. Parasitol Int. 2010;59:626–8. doi: 10.1016/j.parint.2010.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Rajabloo M, Hosseini SH, Jalousian F. Morphological and molecular characterisation of Echinococcus granulosus from goat isolates in Iran. Acta Trop. 2012;123:67–71. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2012.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Azami M, Anvarinejad M, Ezatpour B, Alirezaei M. Prevalence of hydatidosis in slaughtered animals in Iran. Turkiye Parazitol Derg. 2013;37:102–6. doi: 10.5152/tpd.2013.24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ahmadi N. Hydatidosis in camels (Camelus dromedarius) and their potential role in the epidemiology of Echinococcusgranulosus in Iran. J helminthol. 2005;79:119–25. doi: 10.1079/joh2005279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Rokni M. Echinococcosis/hydatidosis in Iran. Iran J Parasitol. 2009;4:1–16. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hoghoughi N. A study of the prevalence of Echinococcusgranulosus in dogs and hydatid cyst in sheep, goats, cattle and Man in Isfahan. Pahla Med J. 1971;2:670–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Maurelli MP, Rinaldi L, Capuano F, Perugini AG, Cringoli G. Development of a real-time PCR for the differentiation of the G1 and G2/G3 genotypes of Echinococcus granulosus. Parasitol Res. 2009;105:255–9. doi: 10.1007/s00436-009-1388-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Dinkel A, Njoroge EM, Zimmermann A, Wälz M, Zeyhle E, Elmahdi IE, et al. A PCR system for detection of species and genotypes of the Echinococcus granulosus complex, with reference to the epidemiological situation in eastern Africa. Int J Parasitol. 2004;34:645–53. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2003.12.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Bowles J, Blair D, McManus DP. Genetic variants within the genus Echinococcus identified by mitochondrial DNA sequencing. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1992;54:165–73. doi: 10.1016/0166-6851(92)90109-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol. 1980;16:111–20. doi: 10.1007/BF01731581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kumar S, Nei M, Dudley J, Tamura K. MEGA: a biologist-centric software for evolutionary analysis of DNA and protein sequences. Brief Bioinform. 2008;9:299–306. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbn017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol. 2011;28:2731–9. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msr121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ngui R, Lim YA, Chua KH. Rapid detection and identification of human hookworm infections through high resolution melting (HRM) analysis. PloS one. 2012;7:e41996. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Rostami S, Talebi S, Babaei Z, Sharbatkhori M, Ziaali N, Rostami H, et al. High resolution melting technique for molecular epidemiological studies of cystic echinococcosis: differentiating G1, G3, and G6 genotypes of Echinococcus granulosus sensu lato. Parasitol Res. 2013;112:3441–7. doi: 10.1007/s00436-013-3523-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.McManus D. The molecular epidemiology of Echinococcusgranulosus and cystic hydatid disease. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2002;96:S151–7. doi: 10.1016/s0035-9203(02)90068-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Pour AA, Hosseini SH, Shayan P. Comparative genotyping of Echinococcus granulosus infecting buffalo in Iran using cox1 gene. Parasitol Res. 2011;108:1229–34. doi: 10.1007/s00436-010-2170-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Youssefi M, Tabaripour R, Fallah Omrani V, Spotin A. Esfandiari Genotypic characterization of Echinococcus granulosus in Iranian goats. Asian Pac J Trop Dis. 2013;3:362–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Rostami S, Torbaghan SS, Dabiri S, Babayi Z, Mohammadi MA, Sharbatkhori M, et al. Genetic characterization of Echinococcusgranulosus from a large number of formalin-fixed, paraffin- embedded tissue samples of human isolates in Iran. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2014;92:588–94. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.14-0585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Parsa F, Fasihi Harandi M, Rostami S, Sharbatkhori M. Genotyping Echinococcus granulosus from dogs from Western Iran. Exp Parasitol. 2012;132:308–12. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2012.07.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Rosenzvit M, Zhang LH, Kamenetzky L, Canova S, Guarnera E, McManus D. Genetic variation and epidemiology of Echinococcusgranulosus in Argentina. Parasitology. 1999;118:523–30. doi: 10.1017/s0031182099004035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Casulli A, Manfredi MT, La Rosa G, Cerbo ARD, Genchi C, Pozio E. Echinococcus ortleppi and E granulosus G1, G2 and G3 genotypes in Italian bovines. Vet Parasitol. 2008;155:168–72. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2008.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Sánchez E, Cáceres O, Náquira C, Garcia D, Patiño G, Silvia H, et al. Molecular characterization of Echinococcus granulosus from Peru by sequencing of the mitochondrial cytochrome C oxidase subunit 1 gene. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2010;105:806–10. doi: 10.1590/s0074-02762010000600013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Sharafi SM, Rostami-Nejad M, Moazeni M, Yousefi M, Saneie B, Hosseini-Safa A, et al. Echinococcus granulosus genotypes in Iran. Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench. 2014;7:82. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Varcasia A, Canu S, Kogkos A, Pipia AP, Scala A, Garippa G, et al. Molecular characterization of Echinococcus granulosus in sheep and goats of Peloponnesus, Greece. Parasitol Res. 2007;101:1135–9. doi: 10.1007/s00436-007-0568-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Pestechian N, Hosseini Safa A, Tajedini M, Rostami-Nejad M, Mousavi M, Yousofi H, et al. Genetic diversity of Echinococcusgranulosus in center of Iran. Korean J Parasitol. 2014;52:413–8. doi: 10.3347/kjp.2014.52.4.413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Gastroenterology and Hepatology From Bed to Bench are provided here courtesy of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences

RESOURCES