Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Feb 15.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Diab Rep. 2016 Dec;16(12):124. doi: 10.1007/s11892-016-0815-6

Presence and Risk Factors for Glaucoma in Patients with Diabetes

Brian J Song 1, Lloyd Paul Aiello 2, Louis R Pasquale 1,3
PMCID: PMC5310929  NIHMSID: NIHMS848511  PMID: 27766584

Abstract

Diabetes mellitus represents a growing international public health issue with a near quadrupling in its worldwide prevalence since 1980. Though it has many known microvascular complications, vision loss from diabetic retinopathy is one of the most devastating for affected individuals. In addition, there is increasing evidence to suggest that diabetic patients have a greater risk for glaucoma as well. Though the pathophysiology of glaucoma is not completely understood, both diabetes and glaucoma appear to share some common risk factors and pathophysiologic similarities with studies also reporting that the presence of diabetes and elevated fasting glucose levels are associated with elevated intraocular pressure – the primary risk factor for glaucomatous optic neuropathy. While no study has completely addressed the possibility of detection bias, most recent epidemiologic evidence suggests that diabetic populations are likely enriched with glaucoma patients. As the association between diabetes and glaucoma becomes better-defined, routine evaluation for glaucoma in diabetic patients, particularly in the telemedicine setting, may become a reasonable consideration to reduce the risk of vision loss in these patients.

Keywords: Glaucoma, Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetic Retinopathy, Epidemiology, Risk Factors

INTRODUCTION

Diabetes mellitus represents a significant public health issue which has become increasingly prevalent due to changes and trends in diet, lifestyle, and consequently, the rate of obesity [1]. Since 1980, the worldwide prevalence of diabetes has nearly quadrupled to an estimated 422 million affected persons in 2014 [2]. As a result, global health care expenditures for diabetes are expected to total as much as 490 billion United States dollars by the year 2030, comprising an estimated 12% of total health care costs [3].

The burden of diabetes on the health care system is manifest in many different ways. Diabetic patients require more outpatient visits, chronic medications, and are at risk for a number of systemic microvascular complications that result in end organ damage and associated complications: renal disease, cardiovascular disease, amputations, vision loss, and premature death [3]. In particular, vision loss from diabetic retinopathy (DR) represents one of the most devastating complications on quality of life and is the leading cause of blindness in working age and economically active adults [47]. An older survey among diabetic patients in the United States reported a prevalence of self-rated visual impairment as high as 24.8% [8]. Current estimates of the prevalence of DR have been estimated as 34.6% among all patients with diabetes (both type 1 and type 2) and as a result, the implications of diabetic eye disease are far-reaching [9]. In addition to retinopathy, diabetes has been associated with a number of other potentially vision-threatening ocular complications including cataract, uveitis, and glaucoma [1013].

Glaucoma represents the leading cause of worldwide irreversible blindness, as defined by best-corrected central visual acuity of less than 3/60 or a visual field of less than 10° in the better seeing eye [14]. It is characterized by pathognomonic optic nerve changes which result in progressive visual field loss over time [14]. Primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) is the most common form of glaucoma and is associated with a number of risk factors such as family history, African ancestry, and elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) [15]. Of these, IOP is the only modifiable and effective target of therapy, and as a result, the mainstay of current glaucoma treatment is IOP reduction through the use of medications, laser, or surgery.

Whether or not an association exists between diabetes mellitus and glaucoma has been an issue of debate in the past, but findings from several studies in recent years seem to suggest that the risk of glaucoma among diabetic patients may be greater than once believed [1113,1519]. In this paper, we review the medical literature characterizing the proposed relationship and risk factors for glaucoma in patients with diabetes as well as the potential clinical implications of this association for diabetic individuals.

PATHOPHYSIOLOGIC FEATURES OF DIABETIC EYE DISEASE

A pooled analysis of population-based studies by Yau and colleagues estimates that the total number of people with DR worldwide is approximately 93 million and of these, 28 million (30.1%) have vision-threatening DR [9]. In general, DR is believed to be more common in patients with type 1 diabetes compared to type 2 diabetes. According to this report, the age-standardized prevalence of DR in type 1 diabetic patients was 77.31%, whereas 25.16% of type 2 diabetic patients had DR. The higher rate of DR seen in type 1 diabetic patients is believed to be a result of the increased diabetes duration, hemoglobin A1c levels, and blood pressure typically observed in these patients [9].

As in other organ systems affected by diabetes, microvascular abnormalities are central to the development of DR. Though the exact mechanism by which hyperglycemia causes DR is not completely understood, several factors have been implicated: sorbitol accumulation, oxidative stress, accumulation of advanced glycation end products (AGEs), protein kinase C (PKC) activation, and angiogenic factors [2038].

The biochemical processes associated with chronic hyperglycemia ultimately lead to vascular abnormalities that result in endothelial and metabolic dysfunction both at the level of the eye as well as other organ systems. Loss of retinal pericytes, capillary basement membrane thickening, and vascular endothelial cell dysfunction are some of the early changes that have been described in DR [20,3941]. Impaired retinal vascular autoregulation is seen in part, due to pericyte loss, and disruptions in vascular permeability represent key features that are central to the development of both DR and diabetic macular edema (Figure 1) [42,43]. In addition, increased leukocyte adhesion and retinal leukostasis are believed to play a role in capillary nonperfusion [20,44].

Fig 1.

Fig 1

Nonmydriatic ultrawide field image of the left eye of a patient with quiescent proliferative diabetic retinopathy. A circinate ring of hard exudates is seen in the macula along with numerous dot-blot hemorrhages and microaneurysms consistent with diabetic macular edema. Previous laser photocoagulation scars are present in the upper left.

Over time, retinal ischemia leads to an uptake of angiogenic growth factors, namely VEGF, which contributes to pathologic processes causing diabetic macular edema as well as retinal neovascularization – the pathognomonic feature of proliferative diabetic retinopathy [45,46]. Overexpression of VEGF under hypoxic conditions is not limited to retinal vascular endothelial cells, but is present in all retinal cell types including retinal pigment epithelial cells and ganglion cells and studies have shown dysfunction in all layers of the diabetic retina [4751]. Over the past decade, therapies targeted at inhibiting VEGF have emerged as highly effective drugs for treating retinal disease have been proven effective. Intravitreal injection of these medications, such as aflibercept, bevacizumab and ranibizumab have demonstrated remarkable efficacy in treating retinal leakage and neovascularization and have become the new standard of care for diabetic macular edema and an alternative treatment for proliferative diabetic retinopathy [5254].

PATHOPHYSIOLOGIC FEATURES OF GLAUCOMA

Glaucoma is a neurodegenerative disorder of the optic nerve in which retinal ganglion cell (RGC) death leads to characteristic patterns of visual field loss. By the year 2020, it is estimated that the worldwide prevalence of glaucoma will approach 80 million people with 11.2 million being bilaterally blind from glaucoma [55]. Though elevated IOP is the primary risk factor for the development of POAG, over half of all patients in the Baltimore Eye Survey had a screening IOP below the upper limit of normal (21 mmHg) [56]. In addition, glaucoma occurring at IOPs within the normal range (10–21 mmHg) is more common than previously believed, particularly among certain East Asian populations where as many as 92% of glaucoma patients have been reported to have normal IOPs in the Tajimi Study, for example [57].

Previously, it was believed that the primary mechanism by which glaucoma occurred was mechanical stress from elevated IOP. Unlike in angle closure glaucoma where narrowing of the iridocorneal angle causes mechanical obstruction of the trabecular meshwork to block aqueous humor outflow, IOP elevation in POAG is believed to be the result of resistance to aqueous outflow. Though IOP elevation is directly related to RGC death, multiple other mechanisms are thought to contribute to the development of glaucomatous optic neuropathy including genetics, impaired microcirculation, and abnormalities in cerebrospinal fluid pressure [58].

Mechanical stress from elevated IOP is thought to occur primarily at the level of the lamina cribrosa – the point at which the optic nerve fibers penetrate the posterior sclera [59]. The optic nerve fibers form the axons of the RGCs, but IOP-induced mechanical stress causes posterior bowing and thinning of the lamina, which disrupts axonal transport [5962]. As a result, the RGCs undergo apoptotic cell death in conjunction with loss of neuroretinal rim tissue of the optic disc and corresponding enlargement of the optic cup (Figure 2) [63].

Fig 2.

Fig 2

(A) Optic nerve photograph from the right eye of a diabetic patient without glaucoma. A healthy neuroretinal rim and a normal cup to disc ratio is seen. (B) Left eye optic nerve photograph from a diabetic patient with glaucoma. Note the enlarged cup to disc ratio and the loss of retinal nerve fibers inferiorly (black arrow).

A growing number of genetic abnormalities have been implicated in the pathogenesis of POAG. The myocilin (MYOC) gene in the locus for primary open angle glaucoma on chromosome 1 (GLC1A), was the first reported gene to be associated with juvenile and early adult forms of POAG [64,65]. Such cases are sometimes referred to as “myocilin glaucoma” [66]. Other genes that have been implicated with increased POAG include CDKN2BAS, SIX1/SIX6, TMCO1, AFAP1, FOXC1, ABCA1, ATXNN2, GAS7, TXNRD2, and CAV1/CAV2 [6771]. In addition, variants in the OPTN, TBK1, and C12orf23 genes have been implicated in open angle glaucoma occurring at normal IOP levels (i.e. normal tension glaucoma) [7174].

Impaired microcirculation is also believed to be a contributing factor in the development of glaucoma since it was first reported by Harrington in 1959, and subsequent studies have provided further evidence that abnormalities in ocular perfusion may be contributory in the development of glaucomatous optic neuropathy, particularly in cases of normal IOP [7584]. More recent research has also focused on the possibility of low cerebrospinal fluid pressure as a contributing mechanism through an increased translaminar pressure gradient which may exacerbate cupping of the optic nerve head [8588].

GLAUCOMA RISK FACTORS AND CORRELATION WITH DIABETES

Common Pathophysiologic Mechanisms in Glaucoma and Diabetes

Several common mechanisms have been postulated to contribute to the possible link between glaucoma and diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes and hyperglycemia is associated with glycation of lipids and abnormalities of lipid metabolism which may increase oxidative stress and promote cellular apoptosis – the same mechanism by which RGC loss occurs in glaucoma [8998].

Vascular dysregulation has been described in both diabetic eye disease and glaucoma, and upregulation of nitric oxide, a potent vasodilator, has been reported in both conditions [99102]. Nitric oxide is a known regulator of not only vascular tone, but also apoptosis [101,103]. In addition, reactive nitrogen species have been shown to contribute to inflammatory responses via oxidative stress and optic nerve degeneration as well [103,104,105]. The contributory role of PKC in the pathophysiology of diabetic retinopathy has also been established and there is evidence to suggest that elevated PKC may also be associated with abnormalities of matrix metalloprotease in the trabecular meshwork causing impaired aqueous outflow and elevated IOP [88,105,106]. In addition, overexpression of matrix metallprotease-9 has been associated with structural optic nerve head changes in diabetic patients, thus providing another potential link between diabetes and glaucoma [89,108,109].

Other pathways by which investigators have linked diabetes and glaucoma include glial cell dysfunction and impairment of retrograde axonal transport [89]. Glial cells, such as astrocytes, are non-neuronal cells that support and protect neurons in the central nervous system, including the retina and optic nerve. Dysfunction of these cells has been demonstrated in animal models of diabetes and glaucoma and is believed to contribute to neuroinflammatory pathways of apoptosis [110116]. In addition, it has been postulated that alterations in connective tissue remodeling due to diabetes may affect both the lamina cribrosa and the trabecular meshwork, thereby potentially increasing susceptibility to glaucoma through biomechanical changes at the optic nerve and impairment of aqueous humor outflow affecting IOP homeostasis [89].

Diminished neurotrophic factor delivery secondary to abnormalities in axonal transport has been demonstrated in both diabetic peripheral neuropathy and the optic nerve in glaucoma [117120]. Alterations in neurotrophic factor expression, such as insulin-like growth factor and neurotrophin-3, are also seen in the presence of elevated intraocular pressure, the primary risk factor for glaucomatous optic neuropathy [121]. In particular, insulin-like growth factor is necessary for proper glucose metabolism in the central nervous system and resistance to insulin may be a contributor to neurodegenerative processes as a result [122125]. With regard to the eye and glaucoma, insulin and insulin-like growth factor have been shown to play a role in RGC survival [122,126128]. In addition, insulin has been reported to affect IOP with lower IOP being associated with insulin-induced hypoglycemia while increased IOP has been associated with insulin resistance [129,140]. Clinically, a large retrospective cohort of diabetic patients with open angle glaucoma reported that metformin, a first-line agent used to treat insulin-resistance in type 2 diabetes, is associated with a decreased risk of developing open angle glaucoma even after accounting for variations in glycemic control [131]. In addition, genetic polymorphisms related to pancreatic beta-cell function in type 2 diabetes mellitus were associated with increased risk of POAG and provide further support for these findings [132].

Neurodegeneration and Ganglion Cell Apoptosis

RGC apoptosis and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thinning are characteristic structural findings seen in glaucoma that have also been described in diabetic retinopathy. In conjunction with RNFL loss, excavation or cupping at the level of the optic nerve head is the pathognomonic finding that is most commonly associated with glaucoma. However, a similar appearance of the optic nerve head may also be seen in the presence of anterior ischemic optic neuropathy, which occurs more frequently in diabetic patients in some studies, or after laser photocoagulation treatment for proliferative diabetic retinopathy [133136]. Structural optic nerve abnormalities have also been reported in an experimental rat model of diabetes, which also showed corresponding RGC dysfunction as measured by electroretinogram [137]. Such similarities can present challenges in distinguishing glaucomatous from non-glaucomatous optic neuropathy, especially in the presence of both conditions.

Though diabetic retinopathy is generally considered primarily a microvascular complication of diabetes, it is now known that neurodegeneration is also a significant component in its pathophysiology and may even precede the microvascular changes that are typically seen in diabetic eye disease [138140]. In a recent study by Sohn and colleagues, progressive loss of both the nerve fiber layer and RGC/inner plexiform layer was observed using optical coherence tomography (OCT) in 45 patients with no or minimal diabetic retinopathy. In the same study, they also demonstrated progressive inner retinal thinning and RGC loss in a streptozotocin-induced mouse model of type 1 diabetes on both OCT and immunohistochemistry [141]. These findings are consistent with earlier work from the same investigators, who reported selective thinning limited to the inner retina in type 1 diabetic patients [142,143]. Cross-sectional human studies from other groups comparing RNFL thickness in healthy subjects and patients with preclinical diabetic retinopathy have also demonstrated mean and superior quadrant RNFL thickness to be reduced in diabetic patients when measured by OCT [144,145]. As a result, neurodegeneration in diabetic eye disease appears to occur in the same location of the neural retina as glaucomatous optic neuropathy.

In addition, neurodegeneration in both glaucoma and diabetic eye disease is believed to be relatively nonselective, affecting all RGC types. In general, RGCs can be classified based on their functional features and projections from the optic nerve head to layers of the lateral geniculate nucleus. Studies in experimental primate models of glaucoma have shown that RGC loss of all types occurs by apoptosis with greater loss occurring as a direct function of IOP [146148]. Specifically, loss of neurons in the magnocellular and parvocellular pathways has been demonstrated in glaucoma, which has also been reported in a histologic study of human retinas with diabetic retinopathy by Meyer-Rusenberg and colleagues as well [147,149].

Functional Abnormalities in Glaucoma and Diabetes

From a functional standpoint, it is well-established that RGC loss in glaucoma is associated with visual field deterioration and loss [150152]. Several animal and human electrophysiologic studies have reported a variety of abnormalities in the presence of both diabetic retinopathy and glaucoma compared to normal eyes [153163]. A recent study of visual field profiles for POAG from the Nurses’ Health Study found that early peripheral, as opposed to paracentral, visual field loss was more common in POAG patients with diabetes mellitus [164]. While the diagnosis of diabetes in this study was based on patient self-report and did not exclude diabetic patients with retinal laser photocoagulation (which can also produce peripheral visual field loss), chart review in a subset of these subjects demonstrated that self-report was a valid method for accurate classification of diabetes among health professionals. Nevertheless, these findings suggest that there may be important phenotypic differences in glaucoma patients depending on diabetes status. Similarly, Kim et al. have also reported differences in the location and rate of deterioration of visual field defects in glaucoma patients based on diabetes status [165].

Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Glaucoma and Diabetes

Hypertension and hyperlipidemia have long been considered significant contributory risk factors for the development and progression of DR, and assessment and management of both hypertension and dyslipidemia in diabetic persons are considered the standard of care by the American Diabetes Association [166174]. However, the contributory role of cardiovascular disease in the development or progression of glaucoma is less clear.

A positive correlation between systemic hypertension and glaucoma has been reported in the Blue Mountain Eye Study, the Rotterdam Study, and the Egna-Neumarkt Study [175177]. However, the Barbados Eye Study and the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial did not find a correlation between systemic hypertension and incidence or progression of glaucoma, although the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial did find that a history of cardiovascular disease was a significant predictor of glaucoma progression [178180]. The Los Angeles Latino Eye Study reported somewhat conflicting results when they reported that both low diastolic and high systolic and mean arterial blood pressures were associated with a higher prevalence of open angle glaucoma even after controlling for IOP [181]. The authors of the study postulate that low diastolic blood pressure can lead to decreased ocular perfusion pressures, which is consistent with the vascular hypothesis of glaucomatous optic neuropathy, whereas changes associated with chronic systemic hypertension, such as arteriosclerosis, can also decrease ocular perfusion [181]. A recent meta-analysis of 16 studies found that individuals with systemic hypertension had a pooled odds ratio of 1.2 for the development of glaucoma compared to normotensive individuals [182]. Several studies have, however, shown a positive correlation between IOP and systemic hypertension, particularly elevated systolic blood pressure [80,175,183189]. Though the Barbados Eye Study did not find a correlation between hypertension and incident glaucoma, elevated systolic blood pressure, diabetes history, and age were positively associated with elevated IOP [183]. While elevated IOP is a risk factor for glaucoma, evidence from the population-based studies above would suggest that these changes in IOP may not always increase the risk of incident glaucoma.

The relationship between glaucoma and dyslipidemia has not been studied as extensively as its relationship with hypertension or diabetes. As in the case of systemic hypertension, there are published reports that dyslipidemia may be associated with increases in IOP [190194]. However, the Beijing Eye Study found that despite a positive correlation between dyslipidemia and IOP, there was no association with glaucoma [194]. Kang and colleagues also found no relationship between risk of POAG and total cholesterol, but consumption of a high ratio of n-3 to n-6 polyunsaturated fat was associated with an increased risk of POAG [195]. Likewise, Ko and colleagues found an association between self-reported diabetes and glaucoma in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, but this association was not significant after adjustment for triglyceride levels [13].

Metabolic Syndrome and Insulin Resistance in Glaucoma and Diabetes

Metabolic syndrome is a cluster of clinical risk factors, including hypertension and dyslipidemia, which is a significant predictor of diabetes [196,197]. Insulin resistance is thought to be involved in the pathophysiology of metabolic syndrome and as a result, the components of metabolic syndrome are comprised of significant systemic risk factors for either elevated IOP or glaucoma [198].

In a study examining individual components of metabolic syndrome, Newman-Casey and colleagues found that hyperlipidemia alone in the absence of diabetes or glaucoma was not a risk factor for open angle glaucoma. However, both diabetes mellitus and systemic hypertension, either alone or in combination, were associated with an increased hazard of open angle glaucoma [199]. A subsequent study from the same investigators found that among patients with hyperlipidemia, the use of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitors, commonly referred to as “statins”, were associated with a significant reduction in the risk of POAG. The authors postulate that it is not treatment of hyperlipidemia but the effect of these medications on pathways that contribute to IOP lowering and neuroprotection that reduces POAG risk [200].

With regard to insulin resistance, a recent study comparing IOP changes in diabetic and non-diabetic individuals found reported that hyperglycemia during oral glucose tolerance testing has a positive correlation with IOP [201]. Similarly, data from the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey also reported higher mean IOP to be positively correlated with estimated insulin resistance in addition to the presence of diabetes mellitus, hypertension, metabolic syndrome, and lipid abnormalities [192]. However, neither of these studies examined the relationship between insulin resistance and glaucoma. In a study of normal tension glaucoma patients and components of metabolic syndrome, Kim and colleagues found hypertension and impaired glucose tolerance were associated with a significantly higher prevalence of normal tension glaucoma [202]. However, a slightly lower prevalence of glaucoma was seen among participants with metabolic syndrome in the Singapore Malay Eye Study and neither pre-diabetes or metabolic syndrome were consistently associated with glaucoma in a cross-sectional study of subjects from the 2005–2008 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey [12,203]. Recently, a study using healthcare claims data reported a dose-dependent reduction in POAG risk among diabetic persons using metformin, the first-line medication used to treat patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and improve insulin sensitivity. In addition, those subjects with a higher Hemoglobin A1c had an increased risk of glaucoma, suggesting that glycemic control and insulin sensitivity may contribute to glaucoma risk [204]. When considered together, many of the risk factors associated with diabetes may also be contributory to glaucoma as well.

EPIDEMIOLOGY OF GLAUCOMA IN DIABETIC POPULATIONS

Many epidemiologic studies have examined the relationship between diabetes and glaucoma risk with somewhat mixed results [1113,1519,199,205211]. Some of these discrepancies may be related to the study sample, sample size, patient drop-out, detection bias, reverse causation, and variations in the diagnostic criteria and methods for defining glaucoma and diabetes. In addition, these studies were not designed with a primary endpoint of evaluating the association between glaucoma and diabetes. For example, the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study, a randomized trial that examined the safety and efficacy of IOP lowering medications in delaying or preventing the development of POAG, initially reported that diabetes was protective against the conversion from ocular hypertension (elevated IOP without optic neuropathy) to glaucoma [212]. However, the diagnosis of diabetes was made by patient self-report and further analysis showed that the study sample was underpowered to find an effect of diabetes on the development of glaucoma [213]. Despite these discrepancies, the majority of the evidence suggests an increased risk of POAG in persons with diabetes.

A recent meta-analysis of 47 studies by Zhao and colleagues reported a pooled relative risk of glaucoma of 1.48 in patients with diabetes compared to those without diabetes [11]. In addition, there was an increasing relative risk of glaucoma that was positively associated with diabetes duration. Though elevated IOP alone is a significant risk factor for but is not diagnostic for glaucoma, diabetic patients had a pooled average increase in IOP of 0.09 mmHg for every 10 mg/dl increase in fasting glucose [11]. Using a different approach than the epidemiologic studies above, findings by Goldacre and colleagues seem to provide further evidence for a possible link between glaucoma and diabetes. By studying a large data set of hospital linkage records from the United Kingdom, they found that the rate ratio for glaucoma among inpatients admitted for diabetes was substantially increased at 2.47 compared to the reference cohort. Interestingly, the risk of glaucoma among inpatients admitted for hypertension was only modestly elevated at 1.07 [214].

The global prevalence of glaucoma among all people, including both diabetic and nondiabetic persons, is estimated to be approximately 3%. However, this figure can vary significantly by age and race [14,215]. In contrast, the prevalence of glaucoma that has been reported specifically in diabetic populations ranges from 2.5% to 15.6% [13,204,210,216221]. In total, the majority of these studies suggest that glaucoma prevalence is approximately two to three times higher in diabetic populations compared to nondiabetic populations.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL CARE

The American Diabetes Association currently recommends that all patients with diabetes undergo annual dilated funduscopic examinations to evaluate for the presence of retinopathy, although eye examinations may be performed every 2 years at the discretion of the eye care provider if no retinopathy is present. For newly diagnosed patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus, an initial eye examination is recommended within five years after diagnosis. For type 2 diabetes mellitus, eye examinations are recommended at the time of diagnosis [222]. However, compliance with eye examination guidelines are modest at best, especially in the absence of eye abnormalities. Computerized billing records from a single tertiary eye care facility reported a compliance rate of just 31% among diabetic patients without retinopathy [223]. One potential proposal to improve compliance with eye examination guidelines is integration of a telemedicine program, which has been shown to increase compliance rates when integrated within primary care centers [224].

Current guidelines for glaucoma screening are more controversial. In 2013, the United States Preventive Services Task Force stated that there is insufficient evidence to support routine screening for primary open angle glaucoma among visually asymptomatic adults [225]. These recommendations have initiated much debate about the utility of glaucoma screening efforts as a result [226,227]. However, glaucoma has many features that would be amenable to effective screening. Affected patients are often asymptomatic, especially in earlier stages of the disease. Many patients experience a relatively slow rate of progression and studies have shown that higher treatment costs are associated with management of more advanced stages of the disease [228,229]. In addition, glaucoma is a condition with effective and proven treatments and the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial has shown that therapies that reduce IOP are effective in delaying the progression of glaucomatous vision loss [230].

As a result, some have argued that an opportunistic, case-finding approach to glaucoma screening may be of value in high-risk populations [227,231]. In this regard, the implications of the purported glaucoma risk associated with diabetes are significant. A recent study by Silva and colleagues examining the prevalence of non-diabetic ocular findings in a diabetes telemedicine program reported that the rate of glaucomatous and glaucoma-suspicious optic nerves on funduscopic imaging ranged from 8.9 to 9.9% depending on the imaging device used [232]. Consequently, there may be reasonable cost-benefit in developing and incorporating effective glaucoma screening methods for diabetic patients, particularly those who already undergo fundoscopic imaging in teleretinal programs where simultaneous optic nerve evaluation for glaucoma may increase the diagnostic yield of potentially blinding eye disease.

CONCLUSION

Both diabetes and glaucoma represent significant public health issues in the aging population. Several epidemiologic studies suggest that diabetic individuals are at increased risk for the development of glaucoma and there may be pathophysiologic similarities to support an association between these two conditions [1113,1519,205211]. Given the potential to utilize early detection and treatment efforts to significantly reduce vision loss from both glaucoma and diabetic retinopathy in at-risk individuals, the possible role of routine glaucoma evaluation in diabetic persons warrants further consideration as we continue to learn more about the association between these two blinding conditions.

Acknowledgments

Supported in part by the Harvard Vision Clinical Scientist Development Program through the National Institute of Health Grant 5K12 EY016335 (Bethesda, MD), the Harvard Glaucoma Center of Excellence (Boston, MA), and the Massachusetts Lions Eye Research Fund (Belmont, MA).

Footnotes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Lloyd Paul Aiello has received travel reimbursement from Optos plc (Dunfermline, United Kingdom).

Outside the scope of this work, Louis R. Pasquale is a paid consultant for Novartis and Bausch+Lomb, Inc. He has received travel support to attend Glaucoma Think Tank meetings by the Glaucoma Foundation (New York, NY).

Brian J. Song has no conflicts of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as:

• Of Importance

•• Of major importance

  • 1.Shaw JE, Sicree RA, Zimmet PZ. Global estimates of the prevalence of diabetes for 2010 and 2030. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2010;87:4–14. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2009.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC) Worldwide trends in diabetes since 1980: a pooled analysis of 751 population-based studies with 4.4 million participants. Lancet. 2016;387:1513–30. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00618-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Zhang P, Zhang X, Brown J, et al. Global healthcare expenditure on diabetes for 2010 and 2030. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2010;87:293–301. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2010.01.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Moss SE, Klein R, Klein BE. The 14-year incidence of visual loss in a diabetic population. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:998–1003. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(98)96025-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cheung N, Mitchell P, Wong TY. Diabetic retinopathy. Lancet. 2010;376:124–36. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)62124-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Klein BE. Overview of epidemiologic studies of diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2007;14:179–83. doi: 10.1080/09286580701396720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ting DS, Cheung GC, Wong TY. Diabetic retinopathy: global prevalence, major risk factors, screening practices and public health challenges: a review. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2016;44:260–77. doi: 10.1111/ceo.12696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Saaddine JB, Narayan KM, Engelgau MM, et al. Prevalence of self-rated visual impairment among adults with diabetes. Am J Public Health. 1999;89:1200–5. doi: 10.2105/ajph.89.8.1200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Yau JW, Rogers SL, Kawasaki R, et al. Global prevalence and major risk factors of diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes Care. 2012;35:556–64. doi: 10.2337/dc11-1909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Stanga PE, Boyd SR, Hamilton AM. Ocular manifestations of diabetes mellitus. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 1999;10:483–9. doi: 10.1097/00055735-199912000-00018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11•.Zhao D, Cho J, Kim MH, et al. Diabetes, fasting glucose, and the risk of glaucoma: a meta-analysis. Ophthalmology. 2015;122:72–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.07.051. This meta-analysis pooled data from previous epidemiologic studies to further support the relationship between diabetes status with glaucoma risk in addition to examining the relationship of diabetic characteristics, specifically diabetes duration and fasting glucose levels, with glaucoma risk as well. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Zhao D, Cho J, Kim MH, et al. Diabetes, glucose metabolism, and glaucoma: the 2005–2008 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. PLoS One. 2014;9:e112460. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ko F, Boland MV, Gupta P, et al. Diabetes, triglyceride levels, and other risk factors for glaucoma in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2005–2008. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016;57:2152–7. doi: 10.1167/iovs.15-18373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Tham YC, Li X, Wong TY, et al. Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology. 2014;121:2081–90. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.05.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Boland MV, Quigley HA. Risk factors and open-angle glaucoma: classification and application. J Glaucoma. 2007;16:406–18. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31806540a1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Mitchell P, Smith W, Chey T, et al. Open-angle glaucoma and diabetes: the Blue Mountains eye study, Australia. Ophthalmology. 1997;104:712–8. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(97)30247-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Klein BE, Klein R, Jensen SC. Open-angle glaucoma and older-onset diabetes. The Beaver Dam Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 1994;101:1173–7. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(94)31191-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Shen L, Walter S, Melles RB, et al. Diabetes pathology and risk of primary open-angle glaucoma: evaluating causal mechanisms by using genetic information. Am J Epidemiol. 2016;183:147–55. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwv204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Pasquale LR, Kang JH, Manson JE, et al. Prospective study of type 2 diabetes mellitus and risk of primary open-angle glaucoma in women. Ophthalmology. 2006;113:1081–6. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.01.066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ciulla TA, Amador AG, Zinman B. Diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema: pathophysiology, screening, and novel therapies. Diabetes Care. 2003;26:2653–64. doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.9.2653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kador PF, Wyman M, Oates PJ. Aldose reductase, ocular diabetic complications and the development of topical Kinostat. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2016;54:1–29. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2016.04.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Brownlee M, Vlassara H, Cerami A. Nonenzymatic glycosylation and the pathogenesis of diabetic complications. Ann Intern Med. 1984;101:527–37. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-101-4-527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Friedman EA. Advanced glycosylated end products and hyperglycemia in the pathogenesis of diabetic compilications. Diabetes Care. 1999;22(Suppl 2):B65–71. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Monnier VM, Sell DR, Dai Z, et al. The role of the amadori product in the complications of diabetes. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2008;1126:81–8. doi: 10.1196/annals.1433.052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Schmidt AM, Yan SD, Wautier JL, et al. Activation of receptor for advanced glycation end products: a mechanism for chronic vascular dysfunction in diabetic vasculopathy and atherosclerosis. Circ Res. 1999;84:489–97. doi: 10.1161/01.res.84.5.489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Singh R, Barden A, Mori T, et al. Advanced glycation end-products: a review. Diabetologia. 2001;44:129–46. doi: 10.1007/s001250051591. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hammes HP, Martin S, Federlin K, et al. Aminoguanidine treatment inhibits the development of experimental diabetic retinopathy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1991;88:11555–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.24.11555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kowluru RA, Engerman RL, Kern TS. Abnormalities of retinal metabolism in diabetes or experimental galactosemia, VIII: prevention by aminoguanidine. Curr Eye Res. 2000;21:814–9. doi: 10.1076/ceyr.21.4.814.5545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kern TS, Engerman RL. Pharmacological inhibition of diabetic retinopathy: aminoguanidine and aspirin. Diabetes. 2001;50:1636–42. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.50.7.1636. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Aiello LP. The potential role of PKC β in diabetic retinopathy and macular edema. Surv Ophthalmol. 2002;47(Suppl 2):S263–9. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6257(02)00391-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Inoguchi T, Battan R, Handler E, et al. Preferential elevation of protein kinase C isoform beta II and diacylglycerol levels in the aorta and heart of diabetic rats: differential reversibility to glycemic control by islet cell transplantation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992;89:11059–63. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.22.11059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Xia P, Inoguchi T, Kern TS, et al. Characterization of the mechanism for the chronic activation of diacylglycerol-protein kinase C pathway in diabetes and hypergalactosemia. Diabetes. 1994;43:1122–9. doi: 10.2337/diab.43.9.1122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Evicmen ND, King GL. The role of protein kinase C activation and the vascular complications of diabetes. Pharmacol Res. 2007;55:498–510. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2007.04.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Idris I, Donelly R. Protein kinase Cβ inhibition: a novel therapeutic strategy for diabetic microangiopathy. Diab Vasc Dis Res. 2006;3:172–8. doi: 10.3132/dvdr.2006.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Meier M, King GL. Protein kinase C activation and its pharmacological inhibition in vascular disease. Vasc Med. 2000;5:173–85. doi: 10.1177/1358836X0000500307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Way KJ, Katai N, King GL. Protein kinase C and the development of diabetic vascular complications. Diabet Med. 2001;18:945–59. doi: 10.1046/j.0742-3071.2001.00638.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Avignon A, Sultan A. PKC-epsilon inhibition: a new therapeutic approach for diabetic complications? Diabetes Metab. 2006;32:205–13. doi: 10.1016/s1262-3636(07)70270-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Sobhia ME, Grewal BK, Bhat J, et al. Protein kinase C βII in diabetic complications: survey of structural, biological and computational studies. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2012;16:325–44. doi: 10.1517/14728222.2012.667804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kubawara T, Cogan DG. Retinal vascular patterns, VI: mural cells of the retinal capillaries. Arch Ophthalmol. 1962;69:492–502. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1963.00960040498013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Sims DE. The pericyte: a review. Tissue Cell. 1986;18:153–74. doi: 10.1016/0040-8166(86)90026-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Antonelli-Orlidge A, Smith SR, D’Amore PA. Influence of pericytes on capillary endothelial cell growth. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1989;140:1129–31. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/140.4.1129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Kohner EM, Patel V, Rassam SM. Role of blood flow and impaired autoregulation in the pathogenesis of diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes. 1995;44:603–7. doi: 10.2337/diab.44.6.603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Ciulla TA, Harris A, Latkany P, et al. Ocular perfusion abnormalities in diabetes. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2002;80:468–77. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0420.2002.800503.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Miyamoto K, Ogura Y. Pathogenetic potential of leukocytes in diabetic retinopathy. Semin Ophthalmol. 1999;14:233–9. doi: 10.3109/08820539909069542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Aiello LP, Avery RL, Arrigg PG, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor in ocular endothelial growth factor in ocular fluid of patients with diabetic retinopathy and other retinal disorders. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:1480–7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199412013312203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Miller JW, Adamis AP, Aiello LP. Vascular endothelial growth factor in ocular neovascularization and proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes Metab Rev. 1997;13:37–50. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-0895(199703)13:1<37::aid-dmr174>3.0.co;2-k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Aiello LP, Northrup JM, Keyt BA, et al. Hypoxic regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor in retinal cells. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995;113:1538–44. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1995.01100120068012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Ng JS, Bearse MA, Jr, Schneck ME, et al. Local diabetic retinopathy prediction by multifocal ERG delays over 3 years. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:1622–8. doi: 10.1167/iovs.07-1157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Abu-El-Asrar AM, Dralands L, Missotten L, et al. Expression of apoptosis markers in the retinas of human subjects with diabetes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:2760–6. doi: 10.1167/iovs.03-1392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Ola MS, Alhomida AS. Neurodegeneration in diabetic retina and its potential drug targets. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2014;12:380–6. doi: 10.2174/1570159X12666140619205024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Barber AJ, Lieth E, Khin SA, et al. Neural apoptosis in the retina during experimental and human diabetes. Early onset and effect of insulin. J Clin Invest. 1998;102:783–91. doi: 10.1172/JCI2425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Ajlan RS, Silva PS, Sun JK. Vascular endothelial growth factor and diabetic retinal disease. Semin Ophthalmol. 2016;31:40–8. doi: 10.3109/08820538.2015.1114833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Avery RL. Regression of retinal and iris neovascularization after intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) treatment. Retina. 2006;26:352–354. doi: 10.1097/00006982-200603000-00016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Gross JG, Glassman AR. A novel treatment for proliferative diabetic retinopathy: anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016;134:13–4. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.5079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Quigley HA, Broman AT. The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006;90:262–7. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2005.081224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Sommer A, Tielsch JM, Katz J, et al. Relationship between intraocular pressure and primary open angle glaucoma among white and black Americans. The Baltimore Eye Survey. Arch Ophthalmol. 1991;109:1090–5. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1991.01080080050026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Iwase A, Suzuki Y, Araie M, et al. The prevalence of primary open-angle glaucoma in Japan: the Tajimi Study. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:1641–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.03.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Weinreb RN, Aung T, Medeiros FA. The pathophysiology and treatment of glaucoma: a review. JAMA. 2014;18:1901–11. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.3192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Quigley HA, Addicks EM, Green W, et al. Optic nerve damage in human glaucoma, II: the site of injury and susceptibility to damage. Arch Ophthalmol. 1981;99:635–49. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1981.03930010635009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Burgoyne CF, Downs JC, Bellezza AJ, et al. The optic nerve head as a biomechanical structure: a new paradigm for understanding the role of IOP-related stress and strain in the pathophysiology of glaucomatous optic nerve head damage. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2005;24:39–73. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2004.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Quigley HA, McKinnon SJ, Zack DJ, et al. Retrograde axonal transport of BDNF in retinal ganglion cells is blocked by acute IOP elevation in rats. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:3460–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Fechtner RD, Weinreb RN. Mechanisms of optic nerve damage in primary open angle glaucoma. Surv Ophthalmol. 1994;39:23–42. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6257(05)80042-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Quigley HA, Nickells RW, Kerrigan LA, et al. Retinal ganglion cell death in experimental glaucoma and after axotomy occurs by apoptosis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1995;36:774–86. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Alward WL, Kwon YH, Khanna CL, et al. Variations in the myocilin gene in patients with open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120:1189–97. doi: 10.1001/archopht.120.9.1189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Stone EM, Fingert JH, Alward WL, et al. Identification of a gene that causes primary open angle glaucoma. Science. 1997;275:668–70. doi: 10.1126/science.275.5300.668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Gong G, Kosoko-Lasaki O, Haynatzki GR, et al. Genetic dissection of myocilin glaucoma. Hum Mol Genet. 2004;13(Spec No 1):R91–102. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddh074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Thorleifsson G, Walters GB, Hewitt AW, et al. Common variants near CAV1 and CAV2 are associated with primary open-angle glaucoma. Nat Genet. 2010;42:906–9. doi: 10.1038/ng.661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Wiggs JL, Kang JH, Yaspan BL, et al. Common variants near CAV1 and CAV2 are associated with primary open angle glaucoma in Caucasians from the USA. Hum Mol Genet. 2011;20:4707–13. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddr382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Burdon KP, Macgregor S, Hewitt AW, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies susceptibility loci for open angle glaucoma at TMCO1 and CDKN2B-AS1. Nat Genet. 2011;43:574–8. doi: 10.1038/ng.824. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Wiggs JL, Yaspan BL, Hauser MA, et al. Common variants at 9p21 and 8q22 are associated with increased susceptibility to optic nerve degeneration in glaucoma. PLoS Genet. 2012;8:e1002654. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Cooke Bailey JN, Loomis SJ, Kang JH, et al. Genome-wide association analysis identifies TXNRD2, ATXN2, and FOXC1, as susceptibility loci for primary open-angle glaucoma. Nat Genet. 2016;48:189–94. doi: 10.1038/ng.3482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Fingert JH, Robin AL, Stone JL, et al. Copy number variations on chromosome 12q14 in patients with normal tension glaucoma. Hum Mol Genet. 2011;20:2482–94. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddr123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Minegishi Y, Iejima D, Kobayashi H, et al. Enhanced optineurin E50K-TBK1 interaction evokes protein insolubility and initiates familial primary open-angle glaucoma. Hum Mol Genet. 2013;22:3559–67. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddt210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Rezaie T, Child A, Hitchings R, et al. Adult-onset primary open-angle glaucoma caused by mutations in optineurin. Science. 2002;295:1077–9. doi: 10.1126/science.1066901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Harrington DO. The pathogenesis of the glaucoma field: Clinical evidence that circulatory insufficiency in the optic nerve is the primary cause of visual field loss in glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1959;47:177–85. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Haas JS. Low tension glaucoma. Trans Pac Coast Otoophthalmol Soc Annu Meet. 1962;43:153–60. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Chung HS, Harris A, Kagemann L, Martin B. Peripapillary retinal blood flow in normal tension glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 1999;83:466–9. doi: 10.1136/bjo.83.4.466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Anderson DR. Glaucoma, capillaries and pericytes: 1. Blood flow regulation. Ophthalmologica. 1996;210:257–62. doi: 10.1159/000310722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Johnson DG, Drance SM. Some studies on the circulation in patients with advanced open angle glaucoma. Can J Ophthalmol. 1968;3:149–53. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Tielsch JM, Katz J, Sommer A, et al. Hypertension, perfusion pressure and primary open-angle glaucoma. A population-based assessment. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995;113:216–21. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1995.01100020100038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Leske MC, Wu SY, Nemesure B, et al. Incident open-angle glaucoma and blood pressure. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120:954–9. doi: 10.1001/archopht.120.7.954. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Choi J, Jeong J, Cho H, Kook MS. Effect of nocturnal blood pressure reduction on circadian fluctuation of mean ocular perfusion pressure: A risk factor for normal tension glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:831–6. doi: 10.1167/iovs.05-1053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Leske MC. Ocular perfusion pressure and glaucoma: Clinical trial and epidemiological findings. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2009;20:73–8. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0b013e32831eef82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Mroczkowska S, Ekart A, Sung V, et al. Coexistence of macro- and micro-vascular abnormalities in newly diagnosed normal tension glaucoma patients. Acta Ophthalmol. 2012;90:e553–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2012.02494.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Morgan WH, Yu DY, Alder VA, et al. The correlation between the cerebrospinal fluid pressure and retrolaminar tissue pressure. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1998;39:1419–28. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Morgan WH, Yu DY, Cooper RL, et al. The influence of cerebrospinal fluid pressure on the lamina cribrosa tissue pressure gradient. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1995;36:1163–72. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Wang N, Xie X, Yang D, et al. Orbital cerebrospinal fluid space in glaucoma: the Beijing Intracranial and Intraocular Pressure (iCOP) study. Ophthalmology. 2012;119:2065–73. e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.03.054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Ren R, Jonas JB, Tian G, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid pressure in glaucoma: a prospective study. Ophthalmology. 2010;117:259–66. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.06.058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Wong VH, Bui BV, Vingrys AJ. Clinical and experimental links between diabetes and glaucoma. Clin Exp Optom. 2011;94:4–23. doi: 10.1111/j.1444-0938.2010.00546.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Schofield JD, Liu Y, Rao-Balakrishna P, et al. Diabetes Dyslipidemia. Diabetes Ther. 2016;7:203–19. doi: 10.1007/s13300-016-0167-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Chapman MJ, Ginsberg HN, Amarenco P, et al. Triglyceride-rich lipoproteins and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in patients at high risk of cardiovascular disease: evidence and guidance for management. Eur Heart J. 2011;32:1345–61. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Baigent C, Keech A, Kearney PM, et al. Efficacy and safety of cholesterol-lowering treatment: prospective meta-analysis of data from 90,056 participants in 14 randomised trials of statins. Lancet. 2005;366:1267–78. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67394-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Cholesterol Treatment Trialists Collaborators. Kearney PM, Blackwell L, et al. Efficacy of cholesterol-lowering therapy in 18,686 people with diabetes in 14 randomised trials of statins: a meta-analysis. Lancet. 2008;371:117–25. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60104-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Pietri AO, Dunn FL, Grundy SM, Raskin P. The effect of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion on very-low-density lipoprotein triglyceride metabolism in type I diabetes mellitus. Diabetes. 1983;32:75–81. doi: 10.2337/diab.32.1.75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Tames FJ, Mackness MI, Arrol S, et al. Non-enzymatic glycation of apolipoprotein B in the sera of diabetic and non-diabetic subjects. Atherosclerosis. 1992;93:237–44. doi: 10.1016/0021-9150(92)90260-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Huang YS, Horrobin DF, Manku MS, et al. Tissue phospholipid fatty acid composition in the diabetic rat. Lipids. 1984;19:367–70. doi: 10.1007/BF02534790. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Ruiz-Gutierrez V, Stiefel P, Villar J, et al. Cell membrane fatty acid composition in type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetic patients: relationship with sodium transport abnormalities and metabolic control. Diabetologia. 1993;36:850–6. doi: 10.1007/BF00400361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Ghebremeskel K, Thomas B, Lowy C, et al. Type 1 diabetes compromises plasma arachidonic and docosahexaenoic acids in newborn babies. Lipids. 2004;39:335–42. doi: 10.1007/s11745-004-1237-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Toda N, Nakanishi-Toda M. Nitric oxide: ocular blood flow, glaucoma and diabetic retinopathy. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2007;26:205–38. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2007.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Zheng L, Kern TS. Role of nitric oxide, superoxide, peroxynitrite, and PARP in diabetic retinopathy. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed) 2009;14:3974–87. doi: 10.2741/3505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Cavet ME, Vittitow JL, Impagnatiello F, et al. Nitric oxide (NO): an emerging target for the treatment of glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014;55:5005–15. doi: 10.1167/iovs.14-14515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Husain S, Abdul Y, Singh S, et al. Regulation of nitric oxide production by δ-opioid receptors during glaucomatous injury. PLoS One. 2014;9:e110397. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Hara MR, Agrawal N, Kim SF. S-nitrosylated GAPDH initiates apoptotic cell death by nuclear translocation following Siah1 binding. Nat Cell Biol. 2005;7:665–74. doi: 10.1038/ncb1268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Goldstein IM, Ostwald P, Roth S. Nitric oxide: a review of its role in retinal function and disease. Vision Res. 1996;36:2979–94. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(96)00017-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Pacher P, Beckman JS, Liaudet L. Nitric oxide and peroxynitrite in health and disease. Physiol Rev. 2007;87:315–424. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00029.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Alexander JP, Acott TS. Involvement of protein kinase C in TNFalpha regulation of trabecular matrix metalloproteinases and TIMPs. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:2831–38. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Khurana RN, Deng PF, Epstein DL, et al. The role of protein kinase C in modulation of aqueous humor outflow facility. Exp Eye Res. 2003;76:39–47. doi: 10.1016/s0014-4835(02)00255-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Kuehn MH, Fingert JH, Kwon YH. Retinal ganglion cell death in glaucoma: mechanisms and neuroprotective strategies. Ophthalmol Clin North Am. 2005;18:383–95. doi: 10.1016/j.ohc.2005.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Sivak JM, Fini ME. MMPs in the eye: emerging roles for matrix metalloproteinases in ocular physiology. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2002;21:1–14. doi: 10.1016/s1350-9462(01)00015-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Nagayach A, Patro N, Patro I. Experimentally induced diabetes causes glial activation, glutamate toxicity and cellular damage leading to changes in motor function. Front Cell Neurosci. 2014;8:355. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2014.00355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Coleman E, Judd R, Hoe L, et al. Effects of diabetes mellitus on astrocyte GFAP and glutamate transporters in the CNS. Glia. 2004;48:166–72. doi: 10.1002/glia.20068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Sandireddy R, Yerra VG, Areti A, et al. Neuroinflammation and oxidative stress in diabetic neuropathy: futuristic strategies based on these targets. Int J Endocrinol. 2014;2014:674987. doi: 10.1155/2014/674987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Scholz J, Woolf CJ. The neuropathic pain triad: neurons, immune cells and glia. Nature Neuroscience. 2007;10:1361–8. doi: 10.1038/nn1992. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Morgan JE. Optic nerve head structure in glaucoma: astrocystes as mediators of axonal damage. Eye (Lond) 2000;14:437–44. doi: 10.1038/eye.2000.128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Ju WK, Kim KY, Lindsey JD, et al. Intraocular pressure elevation induces mitochondrial fission and triggers OPA1 release in glaucomatous optic nerve. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:4903–11. doi: 10.1167/iovs.07-1661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Chong RS, Martin KR. Glial cell interactions and glaucoma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2015;26:73–7. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Tomlinson DR, Fernyhough P, Diemel LT. Role of neurotrophins in diabetic neuropathy and treatment with nerve growth factors. Diabetes. 1997;46(Suppl 2):S43–9. doi: 10.2337/diab.46.2.s43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Fernyhough P, Diemel LT, Tomlinson DR. Target tissue production and axonal transport of neurotrophin-3 are reduced in streptozotocin-diabetic rats. Diabetologia. 1998;41:300–6. doi: 10.1007/s001250050907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Zhang L, Ino-ue M, Dong K, et al. Retrograde axonal transport impairment of large- and medium-sized retinal ganglion cells in diabetic rat. Curr Eye Res. 2000;20:131–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Ino-Ue M, Zhang L, Naka H, et al. Polyol metabolism of retrograde axonal transport in diabetic rat large optic nerve fiber. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:4055–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Rudzinski M, Wong TP, Saragovi HU. Changes in retinal expression of neurotrophins and neurotrophin receptors induced by ocular hypertension. J Neurobiol. 2004;58:341–54. doi: 10.1002/neu.10293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Faiq MA, Dada R, Saluja D, et al. Glaucoma – diabetes of the brain: a radical hypothesis about its nature and pathogenesis. Med Hypotheses. 2014;82:535–46. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2014.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Cheng CM, Reinhardt RR, Lee WH, et al. Insulin-like growth factor 1 regulates developing brain glucose metabolism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97:10236–41. doi: 10.1073/pnas.170008497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Bingham EM, Hopkins D, Smith D, et al. The role of insulin in human brain glucose metabolism: an 18fluoro deoxyglucose positron emission tomography study. Diabetes. 2002;51:3384–90. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.51.12.3384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Ott A, Stolk RP, van Harskamp F, et al. Diabetes mellitus and the risk of dementia: The Rotterdam Study. Neurology. 1999;53:1937–42. doi: 10.1212/wnl.53.9.1937. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Ballotti R, Nielsen FC, Pringle N, et al. Insulin-like growth factor 1 in cultured rat astrocytes: expression of the gene, and receptor tyrosine kinase. EMBO J. 1987;6:3633–9. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1987.tb02695.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Meyer-Franke A, Kaplan MR, Pfrieger FW, et al. Characterization of the signaling interactions that promote the survival and growth of developing retinal ganglion cells in culture. Neuron. 1995;15:805–19. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(95)90172-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Fischer AJ, Dierks BD, Reh TA. Exogenous growth factors induce the production of ganglion cells at the retinal margin. Development. 2002;129:2283–91. doi: 10.1242/dev.129.9.2283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Hepburn DA, Fisher BM, Thomson I, et al. Autonomic mechanisms underlying intraocular pressure changes during insulin-induced hypoglycaemia in normal human subjects: effects of pharmacological blockade. Clin Sci (Lond) 1991;80:333–8. doi: 10.1042/cs0800333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Oh SW, Lee S, Park C, et al. Elevated intraocular pressure is associated with insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2005;21:434–40. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Lin HC, Stein JD, Nan B, et al. Association of geroprotective effects of metformin and risk of open-angle glaucoma in persons with diabetes mellitus. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015;133:915–23. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.1440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Shen L, Walter S, Melles RB, et al. Diabetes pathology and risk of primary open-angle glaucoma: evaluating causal mechanisms by using genetic information. Am J Epidemiol. 2016;183:147–55. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwv204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Sebag J, Thomas JV, Epstein DL, et al. Optic disc cupping in arteritic AION resembles glaucomatous cupping. Ophthalmology. 1986;93:357–61. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(86)33735-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Quigley H, Anderson DR. Cupping of the optic disc in ischemic optic neuropathy. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 1977;83:755–62. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Piette SD, Sergott RC. Pathological optic-disc cupping. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2006;17:1–6. doi: 10.1097/01.icu.0000193072.17122.f3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Lim MC, Tanimoto SA, Furlani BA, et al. Effect of diabetic retinopathy and panretinal photocoagulation on retinal nerve fiber layer and optic nerve appearance. Arch Ophthalmol. 2009;127:857–62. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2009.135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Bui BV, Loeliger M, Thomas M, et al. Investigating structural and biochemical correlates of ganglion cell dysfunction in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Exp Eye Res. 2009;88:1076–83. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2009.01.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Antonetti DA, et al. JDRF Diabetic Retinopathy Center Group. Diabetic retinopathy: Seeing beyond glucose-induced microvascular disease. Diabetes. 2006;55:2401–11. doi: 10.2337/db05-1635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Stem MS, Gardner TW. Neurodegeneration in the pathogenesis of diabetic retinopathy: Molecular mechanisms and therapeutic implications. Curr Med Chem. 2013;20:3241–50. doi: 10.2174/09298673113209990027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.van Dijk HW, Verbraak FD, Stehouwer M, et al. Association of visual function and ganglion cell layer thickness in patients with diabetes mellitus type 1 and no or minimal diabetic retinopathy. Vision Res. 2011;51:224–8. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.08.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Sohn EH, van Dijk HW, Jiao C, et al. Retinal neurodegeneration may precede microvascular changes characteristic of diabetic retinopathy in diabetes mellitus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016;113:E2655–64. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1522014113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.van Dijk HW, Kok PH, Garvin M, et al. Selective loss of inner retinal layer thickness in type 1 diabetic patients with minimal diabetic retinopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50:3404–9. doi: 10.1167/iovs.08-3143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.van Dijk HW, Verbraak FD, Kok PH, et al. Decreased retinal ganglion cell layer thickness in type 1 diabetic patients. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:3660–5. doi: 10.1167/iovs.09-5041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Peng PH, Lin HS, Lin S. Nerve fibre layer thinning in patients with preclinical retinopathy. Can J Ophthalmol. 2009;44:417–22. doi: 10.3129/i09-112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Sugimoto M, Sasoh M, Ido M, et al. Detection of early diabetic change with optical coherence tomography in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients without retinopathy. Ophthalmologica. 2005;219:379–85. doi: 10.1159/000088382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Yücel YH, Zhang Q, Weinreb RN, et al. Effect of retinal ganglion cell loss on magno-, parvo-, koniocellular pathways in the lateral geniculate nucleus and visual cortex in glaucoma. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2003;22:465–81. doi: 10.1016/s1350-9462(03)00026-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Yücel YH, Zhang Q, Gupta N, et al. Loss of neurons in magnocellular and parvocellular layers of the lateral geniculate nucleus in glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000;118(3):378–84. doi: 10.1001/archopht.118.3.378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Quigley HA, Nickells RW, Kerrigan LA, et al. Retinal ganglion cell death in experimental glaucoma and after axotomy occurs by apoptosis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1995;36:774–86. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Meyer-Rusenberg B, Pavlidis M, Stupp T, et al. Pathological changes in human retinal ganglion cells associated with diabetic and hypertensive retinopathy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2007;245:1009–18. doi: 10.1007/s00417-006-0489-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Moura AL, Raza AS, Lazow MA, et al. Retinal ganglion cell and inner plexiform layer thickness measurements in regions of severe visual field sensitivity loss in patients with glaucoma. Eye (Lond) 2012;26:1188–93. doi: 10.1038/eye.2012.110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Harwerth RS, Carter-Dawson L, Shen F, et al. Ganglion cell losses underlying visual field defects from experimental glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999;40:2242–50. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Harwerth RS, Crawford ML, Frishman LJ, et al. Visual field defects and neural losses from experimental glaucoma. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2002;21:91–125. doi: 10.1016/s1350-9462(01)00022-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Coupland SG. A comparison of oscillatory potential and pattern electroretinogram measures in diabetic retinopathy. Doc Ophthalmol. 1987;66:207–18. doi: 10.1007/BF00145234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Bresnick GH, Palta M. Oscillatory potential amplitudes. Relation to severity of diabetic retinopathy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1987;105:929–33. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1987.01060070065030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Holopigian K, Seiple W, Lorenzo M, et al. A comparison of photopic and scotopic electroretinographic changes in early diabetic retinopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1992;33:2773–80. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Sakai H, Tani Y, Shirasawa E, et al. Development of electroretinographic alterations in streptozotocin-induced diabetes in rats. Ophthalmic Res. 1995;27:57–63. doi: 10.1159/000267571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Shinoda K, Rejdak R, Schuettauf F, et al. Early electroretinographic features of streptozotocin-induced diabetic retinopathy. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2007;35:847–54. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2007.01607.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Moore-Dotson JM, Beckman JJ, Mazade RE, et al. Early retinal neuronal dysfunction in diabetic mice: reduced light-evoked inhibition increases rod pathway signaling. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016;47:1418–30. doi: 10.1167/iovs.15-17999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Parisi V, Uccioli L. Visual electrophysiological responses in persons with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2001;17:12–8. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Viswanathan S, Frishman LJ, Robson JG. The uniform field and pattern ERG in macaques with experimental glaucoma: removal of spiking activity. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:2797–810. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Rangaswamy NV, Frishman LJ, Dorotheo EU, et al. Photopic ERGs in patients with optic neuropathies: comparison with primate ERGs after pharmacologic blockade of inner retina. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:3827–37. doi: 10.1167/iovs.04-0458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Rangaswamy NV, Zhou W, Harwerth RS. Effect of experimental glaucoma in primates on oscillatory potentials of the slow-sequence mfERG. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:753–67. doi: 10.1167/iovs.05-1051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Hood DC, Xu L, Thienprasiddhi P, et al. The pattern electroretinogram in glaucoma patients with confirmed visual field deficits. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:2411–8. doi: 10.1167/iovs.05-0238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Kang JH, Loomis SJ, Rosner BA, et al. Comparison of risk factor profiles for primary open-angle glaucoma subtypes defined by pattern of visual field loss: a prospective study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015;56:2439–48. doi: 10.1167/iovs.14-16088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Kim JM, Kyung H, Shim SH, et al. Location of visual field defects in glaucoma and their modes of deterioration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015;56:7956–62. doi: 10.1167/iovs.15-17297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Nathan DM, Zinman B, Cleary PA, et al. Modern-day clinical course of Type 1 diabetes mellitus after 30 years’ duration: the diabetes control and complications trial/epidemiology of diabetes interventions and complications and Pittsburgh epidemiology of diabetes complications experience (1983–2005) Arch Intern Med. 2009;169(14):1307–16. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Hovind P, Tarnow L, Rossing K, et al. Decreasing incidence of severe diabetic microangiopathy in Type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(4):1258–64. doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.4.1258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Nordwall M, Bojestig M, Arnqvist HJ, Ludvigsson J. Declining incidence of severe retinopathy and persisting decrease of nephropathy in an unselected population of Type 1 diabetes – the Linkoping Diabetes Complications Study. Diabetologia. 2004;47:1266–72. doi: 10.1007/s00125-004-1431-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Fante RJ, Gardner TW, Sundstrom JM. Current and future management of diabetic retinopathy: a personalized evidence-based approach. Diabetes Manag (Lond) 2013;3:481–94. doi: 10.2217/dmt.13.50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Klein R, Knudtson MD, Lee KE, et al. The Wisconsin Epidemiologic Study of Diabetic Retinopathy: XXII the twenty-five-year progression of retinopathy in persons with type 1 diabetes. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:1859–68. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.08.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Yau JW, Rogers SL, Kawasaki R, et al. Meta-Analysis for Eye Disease (META-EYE) Study Group. Global prevalence and major risk factors of diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes Care. 2012;35:556–64. doi: 10.2337/dc11-1909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:977–86. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199309303291401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Abbate M, Cravedi P, Iliev I, et al. Prevention and treatment of diabetic retinopathy: evidence from clinical trials and perspectives. Curr Diabetes Rev. 2011;7:190–200. doi: 10.2174/157339911795843168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Standards of medical care in diabetes-2016: cardiovascular disease and risk management. Diabetes Care. 2016;39(Suppl 1):S60–71. doi: 10.2337/dc16-S011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Dielemans I, Vingerling JR, Algra D, et al. Primary open-angle glaucoma, intraocular pressure, and systemic blood pressure in the general elderly population. The Rotterdam Study. Ophthalmology. 1995;102:54–60. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(95)31054-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176.Mitchell P, Lee AJ, Rochtchina E, et al. Open-angle glaucoma and systemic hypertension: The Blue Mountains Eye Study. J Glaucoma. 2004;13:319–26. doi: 10.1097/00061198-200408000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177.Bonomi L, Marchini G, Marraffa M, et al. Vascular risk factors for primary open angle glaucoma: the Egna-Neumarkt Study. Ophthalmology. 2000;107:1287–93. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(00)00138-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178.Leske MC, Connell AM, Wu SY, et al. Risk factors for open-angle glaucoma: The Barbados Eye Study. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995;113:918–24. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1995.01100070092031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179.Leske MC, Wu SY, Hennis A, et al. Risk factors for incident open-angle glaucoma: the Barbados Eye Studies. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:85–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.03.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180.Leske MC, Heijl A, Hyman L, et al. EMGT Group. Predictors of long-term progression in the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:1965–72. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.03.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 181.Memarzadeh F, Ying-Lai M, Chung J, et al. Blood pressure, perfusion pressure and open angle glaucoma: The Los Angeles Latino Eye Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:2872–7. doi: 10.1167/iovs.08-2956. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182.Bae HW, Lee N, Lee HS, et al. Systemic hypertension as a risk factor for open-angle glaucoma: a meta-analysis of population-based studies. PLoS One. 2014;9:e108226. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183.Wu SY, Leske MC. Associations with intraocular pressure in the Barbados Eye Study. Arch Ophthalmol. 1997;115:1572–6. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1997.01100160742012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 184.Klein BEK, Klein R, Knudtson MD. Intraocular pressure and systemic blood pressure: longitudinal perspective: the Beaver Dam Eye Study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005;89:284–7. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2004.048710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 185.Bulpitt CJ, Hodes C, Everitt MG. Intraocular pressure and systemic blood pressure in the elderly. Br J Ophthalmol. 1975;59:717–20. doi: 10.1136/bjo.59.12.717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 186.Kahn HA, Leibowitz HM, Ganley JP, et al. The Framingham Eye Study. II. Association of ophthalmic pathology with single variables previously measured in the Framingham Heart Study. Am J Epidemiol. 1977;106:33–41. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 187.Klein BE, Klein R. Intraocular pressure and cardiovascular risk variables. Arch Ophthalmol. 1981;99:837–9. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1981.03930010837009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 188.Klein BE, Klein R, Linton KL. Intraocular pressure in an American community. The Beaver Dam Eye Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1992;33:2224–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 189.Foster PJ, Machin D, Wong TY, et al. Determinants of intraocular pressure and its association with glaucomatous optic neuropathy in Chinese Singaporeans: the Tanjong Pagar Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:3885–91. doi: 10.1167/iovs.03-0012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 190.Tan GS, Wong TY, Fong CW, et al. Diabetes, metabolic abnormalities, and glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol. 2009;127:1354–61. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2009.268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 191.Yokomichi H, Kashiwagi K, Kitamura K, et al. Evaluation of the associations between changes in intraocular pressure and metabolic syndrome parameters: a retrospective cohort in Japan. BMJ Open. 2016;6:e010360. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 192.Kim YH, Jung SW, Nam GE, et al. High intraocular pressure is associated with cardiometabolic risk factors in South Korean men: Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2008–2010. Eye (Lond) 2014;28:672–9. doi: 10.1038/eye.2014.43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 193.Wygnaski-Jaffe T, Bieran I, Tekes-Manova D, et al. Metabolic syndrome: a risk factor for high intraocular pressure in the Israeli population. Int J Ophthalmol. 2015;8:403–6. doi: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2015.02.34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 194.Wang S, Xu L, Jonas JB, et al. Dyslipidemia and eye diseases in the adult Chinese population: the Beijing eye study. PLoS One. 2012;7:e26871. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026871. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 195.Kang JH, Pasquale LR, Willett WC, et al. Dietary fat consumption and primary open-angle glaucoma. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004;79:755–64. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/79.5.755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 196.Alberti KGMM, Eckel RH, Grundy SM, et al. Harmonizing the metabolic syndrome: a joint interim statement of the International Diabetes Federation Task Force on Epidemiology and Prevention; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; American Heart Association; World Heart Federation; International Atherosclerosis Society; and International Association for the Study of obesity. Circulation. 2009;120:1640–5. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.192644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 197.Vassallo P, Driver SL, Stone NJ. Metabolic syndrome: an evolving clinical construct. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2016 doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2016.07.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 198.Reaven GM. Banting lecture 1988. Role of insulin resistance in human disease. Diabetes. 1988;37:1595–1607. doi: 10.2337/diab.37.12.1595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 199.Newman-Casey PA, Talwar N, Nan B, et al. The relationship between components of metabolic syndrome and open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2011;118:1318–26. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.11.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 200.Stein JD, Newman-Casey PA, Talwar N, et al. The relationship between statin use and open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2012;119:2074–81. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.04.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 201.Yildiz P, Kebapci MN, Mutlu F, et al. Intraocular pressure changes during oral glucose tolerance tests in diabetic and non-diabetic individuals. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2016;124:385–8. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1569379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 202.Kim M, Jeong JW, Park KH, et al. Metabolic syndrome as a risk factor in normal-tension glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol. 2014;92:e637–43. doi: 10.1111/aos.12434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 203.Tan GS, Wong TY, Fong C-W, et al. Diabetes, metabolic abnormalities, and glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2009;127:1354–61. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2009.268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 204•.Lin HC, Stein JD, Nan B, et al. Association of geroprotective effects of metformin and risk of open-angle glaucoma in persons with diabetes mellitus. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015;133:915–23. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.1440. This study utilizes a large health claims data set to demonstrate that open angle glaucoma risk may be augmented by medication type in diabetic patients, specifically the possible protective role of metformin even after controlling for other confounding effects, such as glycemic control. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 205.Dielemans I, de Jong PT, Stolk R, et al. Primary open angle glaucoma, intraocular pressure, and diabetes mellitus in the general elderly population. The Rotterdam Study. Ophthalmology. 1996;103:1271–5. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(96)30511-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 206.Tielsch JM, Katz J, Quigley HA, et al. Diabetes, intraocular pressure, and primary open-angle glaucoma in the Baltimore Eye Survey. Ophthalmology. 1995;102:48–53. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(95)31055-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 207.De Voogd S, Ikram MK, Wolfs RC, et al. Is diabetes mellitus a risk factor for open-angle glaucoma? The Rotterdam Study. Ophthalmology. 2006;113:1827–31. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.03.063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 208.Chopra V, Varma R, Francis BA, et al. Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and the Risk of Open-angle Glaucoma: The Los Angeles Latino Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:227–32. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.04.049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 209.Graw J, Welzl G, Ahmad N, et al. The KORA Eye Study: a population-based study on eye diseases in Southern Germany (KORA F4) Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52:7778–86. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-7113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 210.Ellis JD, Evans JM, Ruta DA, et al. Glaucoma incidence in an unselected cohort of diabetic patients: is diabetes mellitus a risk factor for glaucoma? DARTS/MEMO collaboration. Diabetes Audit and Research in Tayside Study. Medicines Monitoring Unit. Br J Ophthalmol. 2000;84:1218–24. doi: 10.1136/bjo.84.11.1218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 211.Wise LA, Rosenberg L, Radin RG, et al. A prospective study of diabetes, lifestyle factors, and glaucoma among African-American women. Ann Epidemiol. 2011;21:430–39. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2011.03.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 212.Gordon MO, Beiser JA, Brandt JD, et al. The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: base-line factors that predict the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120:714–20. doi: 10.1001/archopht.120.6.714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 213.Gordon MO, Beiser JA, Kass MA Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study Group. Is a history of diabetes mellitus protective against developing open-angle glaucoma? Arch Ophthalmolol. 2008;126:280–1. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2007.35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 214.Goldacre MJ, Wotton CJ, Keenan TD. Risk of selected eye diseases in people admitted to the hospital for hypertension or diabetes mellitus: record linkage studies. Br J Ophthalmol. 2012;96:872–6. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2012-301519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 215.Varma R, Lee PP, Goldberg I, et al. An assessment of the health and economic burdens of glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011;152:515–22. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2011.06.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 216.Nielsen NV. The prevalence of glaucoma and ocular hypertension in type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus. Acta Ophthalmol. 1983;61:662–72. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.1983.tb04357.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 217.Vyas U, Khandekar R, Trivedi N, et al. Magnitude and determinants of ocular morbidities among persons with diabetes in a project in Ahmedabad, India. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2009;11:601–7. doi: 10.1089/dia.2009.0033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 218.Orcutt J, Avakian A, Koepsell TD, et al. Eye disease in veterans with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(Suppl 2):B50–3. doi: 10.2337/diacare.27.suppl_2.b50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 219.Dharmadhikari S, Lohiya K, Chelkar V, et al. Magnitude and determinants of glaucoma in type II diabetics: A hospital based cross-sectional study in Maharashtra, India. Oman J Ophthalmol. 2015;8:19–23. doi: 10.4103/0974-620X.149858. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 220.Mengesha AY. Spectrum of eye disorders among diabetes mellitus patients in Gaborone, Botswana. Trop Doct. 2006;36:109–11. doi: 10.1258/004947506776593576. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 221.Khandekar R, Zutshi R. Glaucoma among Omani diabetic patients: A cross-sectional descriptive study: (Oman diabetic eye study 2002) Eur J Ophthalmol. 2004;14:19–25. doi: 10.1177/112067210401400104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 222.Standards of medical care in diabetes-2016: microvascular complications and foot care. Diabetes Care. 2016;39(Suppl 1):S72–80. doi: 10.2337/dc16-S012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 223.Lee DJ, Kumar N, Feuer WJ, et al. Dilated eye examination screening guideline compliance among patients with diabetes without a diabetic retinopathy diagnosis: the role of geographic access. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2014;2:e000031. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2014-000031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 224.Olayiwola JN, Sobieraj DM, Kulowski K, et al. Improving diabetic retinopathy screening through a statewide telemedicine program at a large federally qualified health center. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2011;22:804–16. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2011.0066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 225.Moyer VA U S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for glaucoma: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. Ann Intern Med. 2013;159:484–89. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-159-6-201309170-00686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 226.Joint comments of the American Academy of Ophthalmology and the American Glaucoma Society on the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for Glaucoma: Draft Recommendation Statement. AHRQ Publication No. 13-05182-EF-2. [Google Scholar]
  • 227.Parrish RK., 2nd Reframing the US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations on screening for glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014;158:860–2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2014.08.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 228.Lee PP, Walt JG, Doyle JJ, et al. A multicenter, retrospective pilot study of resource use and costs associated with severity of disease in glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2006;124:12–9. doi: 10.1001/archopht.124.1.12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 229.Lee PP, Kelly SP, Mills RP, et al. Glaucoma in the United States and Europe: predicting costs and surgical rates based upon stage of disease. J Glaucoma. 2007;16:471–8. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3180575202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 230.Heijl A, Leske MC, Bengtsson B, et al. Reduction of intraocular pressure and glaucoma progression: results from the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120:1268–79. doi: 10.1001/archopht.120.10.1268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 231.Ladapo JA, Kymes SM, Ladapo JA, Nwosu VC, Pasquale LR. Projected clinical outcomes of glaucoma screening in African American individuals. Arch Ophthalmol. 2012;130:365–72. doi: 10.1001/archopthalmol.2011.1224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 232•.Silva PS, Cavallerano JD, Haddad NM, et al. Comparison of nondiabetic retinal findings identified with nonmydriatic fundus photography vs ultrawide field imaging in an ocular telehealth program. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016;134:330–4. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.5605. This study of ultrawide field imaging and nonmydriatic fundus photography showed that approximately 20% of eyes without diabetic retinopathy had other ocular findings on retinal imaging, with more pathologic findings seen in patients who underwent ultrawide field imaging. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES