Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 29;7(37):59548–59555. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.10934

Table 2. Incidences of cervical cancer by metformin exposure and hazard ratios comparing exposed to unexposed in the original cohort and the matched cohort, respectively.

Metformin use Case number Incident cervical cancer % Person-years Incidence rate (per 100,000 person-years) Hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) P
I. Original cohort
Never users 6940 38 0.55 31307.79 121.38 1.000
Ever users 132971 438 0.33 641413.41 68.29 0.558 (0.401-0.778) 0.0006
Tertiles of cumulative duration of metformin therapy (months)
Never users 6940 38 0.55 31307.79 121.38 1.000
<23.0 43778 254 0.58 161462.49 157.31 1.272 (0.904-1.790) 0.1679
23.0-47.9 44026 146 0.33 221949.93 65.78 0.523 (0.366-0.747) 0.0004
>47.9 45167 38 0.08 258001.00 14.73 0.109 (0.070-0.172) <0.0001
II. Matched cohort
Never users 6940 38 0.55 31303.68 121.39 1.000
Ever users 6940 21 0.30 32891.65 63.85 0.522 (0.306-0.889) 0.0168
Tertiles of cumulative duration of metformin therapy (months)
Never users 6940 38 0.55 31303.68 121.39 1.000
<25.1 2287 12 0.52 8017.01 149.68 1.227 (0.639-2.355) 0.5383
25.1-50.4 2294 8 0.35 11443.50 69.91 0.562 (0.262-1.205) 0.1388
>50.4 2358 1 0.04 13431.15 7.45 0.061 (0.008-0.447) 0.0059

Cox regression models were created by incorporation with the inverse probability of treatment weighting using propensity score created from variables in Table 1 plus the entry date of the patients.