Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 16;16:9. doi: 10.1186/s12940-017-0214-8

Table 5.

Association between log-transformed body burden of six PCB congeners, specified PCB functional groups, HCB and DDE, levels and NHL risk stratified by Subtype

Exposure CLL (n = 42) DLBCL (n = 45)
OR 95% CI  p-value OR(adj) 95% CI  p-value OR 95% CI  p-value OR(adj) 95% CI  p-value
PCB118 0.70 (0.31,1.58) 0.398 5.14 (0.56,47.08) 0.147 0.74 (0.27,2.04) 0.561 0.39 (0.06,2.68) 0.335
PCB138 0.63 (0.26,1.54) 0.309 1.33 (0.15,11.91) 0.801 0.37 (0.10,1.32) 0.126 0.33 (0.04,2.47) 0.281
PCB153 0.50 (0.16,1.52) 0.221 0.70 (0.06,7.77) 0.772 0.32 (0.08,1.26) 0.103 0.16 (0.01,1.84) 0.140
PCB156 0.57 (0.16,2.10) 0.402 1.47 (0.11,19.75) 0.773 0.25 (0.06,0.96) 0.044* 0.01 (0,0.53) 0.023*
PCB170 0.52 (0.16,1.66) 0.267 0.34 (0.03,3.61) 0.372 0.24 (0.06,1.02) 0.053 0.01 (0,0.47) 0.021*
PCB180 0.49 (0.14,1.77) 0.278 0.27 (0.02,4.15) 0.351 0.23 (0.05,0.97) 0.045* 0.01 (0,0.50) 0.020*
HCB 0.42 (0.14,1.26) 0.121 1.12 (0.17,7.40) 0.905 0.90 (0.34,2.39) 0.834 0.41 (0.08,2.00) 0.271
DDE 0.83 (0.44,1.58) 0.578 1.99 (0.52,7.59) 0.313 0.88 (0.43,1.84) 0.743 1.17 (0.35,3.97) 0.796
Exposure FL (n = 39) MM (n = 76)
OR 95% CI  p-value ORb(adj) 95% CI  p-value OR 95% CI  p-value ORb(adj) 95% CI  p-value
PCB118 0.95 (0.41,2.21) 0.904 1.04 (0.34,3.13) 0.947 1.06 (0.55,2.07) 0.856 0.62 (0.23,1.63) 0.330
PCB138 0.91 (0.31,2.67) 0.865 1.17 (0.29,4.77) 0.822 0.74 (0.32,1.70) 0.474 0.45 (0.15,1.32) 0.145
PCB153 0.94 (0.29,3.04) 0.918 1.20 (0.27,5.31) 0.814 0.73 (0.29,1.85) 0.512 0.41 (0.12,1.42) 0.159
PCB156 0.99 (0.32,3.01) 0.979 1.12 (0.24,5.36) 0.885 0.77 (0.31,1.88) 0.561 0.47 (0.14,1.62) 0.234
PCB170 1.39 (0.43,4.51) 0.580 1.65 (0.33,8.24) 0.540 0.77 (0.30,2.00) 0.588 0.42 (0.11,1.66) 0.216
PCB180 1.43 (0.44,4.63) 0.553 1.52 (0.31,7.41) 0.605 0.90 (0.35,2.31) 0.834 0.56 (0.15,2.10) 0.392
HCB 0.82 (0.36,1.86) 0.633 0.83 (0.25,2.70) 0.752 0.70 (0.30,1.61) 0.394 0.31 (0.08,1.19) 0.089
DDE 0.77 (0.41,1.48) 0.437 0.93 (0.34,2.55) 0.885 0.66 (0.37,1.15) 0.142 0.52 (0.25,1.10) 0.086

Results for the four largest subtype groups were included

OR – conditional logistic regression accounting for matching factors

OR(adj) – conditional logistic regression additionally adjusting for BMI, height, educational level, vegetables, dairy, protein, total fat, alcohol

*Significant at the 95% confidence level; Matched case-control pairs with incomplete information on potential confounders were excluded from the adjusted analyses