Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 1;146:667–678. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.08.061

Fig. A1.

Fig. A1

Simulation results. A) The trial averaged simulated timecourses (left) and the trial averaged independent components (right) (SNR = 3). B) 3D visualisations of the simulated (top) and ICA reconstructed (bottom) network topographies (top row). C) Temporal figure of merit scores plotted as a function of SNR for all 4 simulated networks. Note that accurate reconstructions are observed whilst SNR is above a critical threshold level; threshold differs for each network. D) The relation between SNR threshold (defined as when the figure of merit falls below 0.5) and Frobenius norm of the network adjacency matrix. Note that networks with a larger number of connections fare better in low SNR conditions.