Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 16;12(2):e0172390. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172390

Table 3. Mean scores, standard deviations, factor loadings and corrected item-total correlations of the 27 items in the factor structure and Cronbach’s alpha for the five factors.

Nr. Item Mean SD F1 F2 F3 F4 F5 CITC
Perceptions of managementCronbach’s α = 0.86
9 Senior management of this office is doing a good job 3.85 .959 .788 .722
10 The management of this office supports my daily efforts 3.74 1.04 .748 .647
19 Decision making in this office utilizes input from relevant personnel 3.72 .965 .634 .590
5 Medical errors are handled appropriately in this office 4.25 .841 .614 .605
22 This office deals constructively with problem personnel 3.61 .941 .506 .443 .510
30 Disagreements in this office are resolved appropriately (i.e. not who is right but what is best for the patient) 3.85 .917 .534 .609
6 This office does a good job of training new personnel 4.13 .882 .589 .586
3 Nurse input is well received in this office 4.30 .792 .512 .552
26 I am provided with adequate, timely information about events in the office that might affect my work 3.97 .892 .427 .512
Job satisfactionCronbach’s α = 0.81
15 This office is a good place to work 4.34 .845 .795 .752
2 I like my job 4.43 .809 .841 .621
52r I feel frustrated by my job 4.44 .852 .599 .435
29 I am proud to work at this office 4.07 .910 .409 .592 .638
8 Working in this office is like being part of a large family 3.53 1.08 .442 .545 .567
Teamwork climate—Cronbach’s α = 0.77
45 Attending physicians/primary care providers in this office are doing a good job 4.26 .640 .707 .449
35 It is easy for personnel in this office to ask questions when there is something that they do not understand 4.31 .735 .595 .548
38 The physicians and nurses here work together as a well-coordinated team 4.16 .805 .615 .620
34 I have the support I need from other personnel to care for patients 4.07 .838 .541 .549
42 Trainees in my discipline are adequately supervised 4.25 .827 .537 .418
50 Important issues are well communicated at shift changes 4.00 .883 .501 .485
Safety climateCronbach’s α = 0.62
37 During emergencies, I can predict what other personnel are going to do next 3.33 .932 .696 .330
20 I am encouraged by my colleagues to report any patient safety concerns I may have 3.71 .982 .593 .422
21 The culture in this office makes it easy to learn from the errors of others 3.91 .894 .485 .451
28 I know the proper channels to direct questions regarding patient safety in this office 3.93 .990 .468 .408
Communication opennessCronbach’s α = 0.49
24r In the office, it is difficult to speak up if I perceive a problem with patient care 3.61 1.22 .709 .382
12r In this office, it is difficult to discuss errors 3.71 1.13 .662 .311
39r I am frequently unable to express disagreement with staff physicians/intensivists in this office 3.05 1.27 .590 .235

Notes: Factor loadings >0.40 are shown.

Factor loadings in italics indicate that this was not the preferred option.

The letter ‘r’ in a code means that it concerns an item in negative wording, which was reverse coded.

No item correlated more strongly with other factors than with its own factor.

SD = Standard Deviation

CITC = Corrected Item-Total Correlation