Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 4;23(1):59–72. doi: 10.1007/s12298-016-0410-y

Table 2.

Gas exchange in Vigna unguiculata plants splayed with EBR and exposed to water deficit

Water condition EBR (nM) P N (µmol m−2 s−1) E (mmol m−2 s−1) G s (mol m−2 s−1) C i (µmol mol−1) WUE (µmol mmol−1) P N/C i (µmol m−2 s−1 Pa−1)
Control 0 15.6 ± 0.5Ca 3.38 ± 0.02Aa 0.37 ± 0.02Aa 247 ± 15Ab 4.62 ± 0.12Ca 0.063 ± 0.005Ba
Control 50 17.0 ± 0.7Ba 3.38 ± 0.05Aa 0.36 ± 0.01Aa 247 ± 20Ab 5.03 ± 0.15Ba 0.065 ± 0.004Ba
Control 100 19.2 ± 0.4Aa 3.46 ± 0.07Aa 0.38 ± 0.02Aa 247 ± 17Aa 5.55 ± 0.16Aa 0.078 ± 0.006Aa
Water deficit 0 5.2 ± 0.2Cb 1.42 ± 0.09Bb 0.09 ± 0.01Bb 303 ± 10Aa 3.88 ± 0.18Cb 0.017 ± 0.001Cb
Water deficit 50 8.0 ± 0.4Bb 1.67 ± 0.09Ab 0.12 ± 0.01Ab 272 ± 15Ba 4.81 ± 0.22Ba 0.029 ± 0.003Bb
Water deficit 100 10.2 ± 0.5Ab 1.76 ± 0.08Ab 0.12 ± 0.01Ab 249 ± 22Ba 5.80 ± 0.31Aa 0.041 ± 0.003Ab

P N Net photosynthetic rate; E Transpiration rate; g s Stomatal conductance; C i Intercellular CO2 concentration; WUE Water-use efficiency; P N/C i Carboxylation instantaneous efficiency. Columns with different uppercase letters between EBR levels (0, 50 and 100 nM EBR under equal water condition) and lowercase letters between water conditions (control and water deficit under equal EBR concentration) indicate significant differences from the Scott–Knott test (P < 0.05). Values described corresponding to means from five repetitions and standard deviations