Table 1.
Meta-regressions of mean study age on mean time perspective scores.
| Past negative | Past positive | Present fatalistic | Present hedonistic | Future | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coeff | (SE) | p(z) | Coeff | (SE) | p(z) | Coeff | (SE) | p(z) | Coeff | (SE) | p(z) | Coeff | (SE) | p(z) | |
| Sample mean age | -0.01 | (0.00) | <0.1 | -0.00 | (0.00) | ns | 0.00 | (0.00) | ns | -0.02 | (0.00) | <0.01 | 0.00 | (0.00) | ns |
| Year of publication | 0.05 | (0.02) | <1 | 0.10 | (0.02) | <0.01 | 0.07 | (0.02) | <0.01 | 0.11 | (0.02) | <0.01 | 0.10 | (0.02) | <0.01 |
| Percentage of females | -0.85 | (0.55) | ns | 0.03 | (0.48) | ns | -0.47 | (0.47) | ns | -0.34 | (0.40) | ns | 0.09 | (0.51) | ns |
| Context of application | 0.20 | (0.28) | ns | -0.02 | (0.24) | ns | 0.07 | (0.23) | ns | 0.07 | (0.41) | ns | 0.05 | (0.24) | ns |
| After other questionnaires | -0.04 | (0.19) | ns | -0.18 | (0.16) | ns | -0.21 | (0.15) | ns | -0.19 | (0.13) | ns | -0.16 | (0.16) | ns |
| Questionnaire modification | -0.15 | (0.44) | ns | -0.18 | (0.38) | ns | 0.10 | (0.20) | ns | 0.12 | (0.17) | ns | 0.06 | (0.21) | ns |
| Constant | -94.6 | (52.6) | <0.01 | -217 | (0.48) | <0.01 | -139 | (44.3) | <0.01 | 215 | (36.5) | <0.01 | -203 | (48.1) | <0.01 |
| Tau2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||
| Number of studiesa | 56 | 56 | 66 | 66 | 67 | ||||||||||
aN’s change because of missing data.