Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 10;6(2):349–360. doi: 10.1002/cam4.969

Table 1.

Cox regression hazard analysis on the overall survival in the entire cohort

Variables N Univariate Multivariate
HR (95% CI) P‐value HR (95% CI) P‐value
Karyotypes
Favorable 22 Reference Reference
Intermediate 69 1.380 (0.685–2.782) 0.368 4.339 (1.559–12.076) 0.005
Unfavorable 21 3.147 (1.433–6.909) 0.004 7.024 (2.340–21.088) 0.001
Genetic alterations
CEBPA* 7 0.410 (0.100–1.679) 0.215 0.378 (0.089–1.610) 0.188
DNMT3A 14 0.460 (0.184–1.148) 0.096 0.622 (0.188–2.051) 0.435
IDH2 14 0.481 (0.192–1.200) 0.117 0.307 (0.083–1.135) 0.077
IDH1 4 0.771 (0.188–3.154) 0.718 3.651 (0.747–18.858) 0.110
GATA2 7 0.839 (0.263–2.676) 0.767 0.291 (0.055–1.530) 0.145
NPM1 17 0.945 (0.450–1.985) 0.882
WT1 13 0.987 (0.425–2.291) 0.976 1.074 (0.438–2.635) 0.876
FLT3‐ITD 24 1.223 (0.684–2.186) 0.497
ASXL1 18 1.242 (0.648–2.381) 0.514 1.089 (0.524–2.264) 0.819
TET2 12 1.648 (0.784–3.462) 0.188 3.740 (1.598–8.750) 0.002
RUNX1 7 1.815 (0.781–4.220) 0.166 2.037 (0.821–5.050) 0.125
TP53 9 2.043 (0.816–5.113) 0.127 1.916 (0.628–5.842) 0.253
PHF6 3 2.061 (0.645–6.584) 0.223 6.016 (1.255–28.844) 0.025
KIT 5 2.429 (0.965–6.117) 0.060 12.131 (3.175–46.358) <0.001
U2AF1 3 4.293 (1.322–13.94) 0.015 6.575 (0.987–43.815) 0.052
NPM + /FLT 10 0.662 (0.240–1.824) 0.425 0.225 (0.059–0.855) 0.028

HR, hazard ratio; ITD, internal tandem duplication.

CEBPA*: CEBPA double mutation; NPM + /FLT : NPM1 mutation/FLT3‐ITDnegative