Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 17;12(2):e0172146. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172146

Table 5. Impact of the EAAD campaigns on perception and behavior (Waves 1–5).

Management Wave 1 October 2009% Wave 2 December 2009% (change) Wave 2 vs.1 sig.* Wave 3 October 2010% (change) Wave 3 vs.1 sig. Wave 4 December 2010% (change) Wave 4 vs.1 sig. Wave 5 December 2011% (change) Wave 5 vs.1 sig.
The reason for last taking antibiotic:
Cold 30 33 (↑3) 0.35 38 (↑8) 0.021 28 (↓2) 0.654 21 (↓9) 0.008
Sore throat 24 25 (↑1) 0.721 29 (↑5) 0.112 27 (↑3) 0.307 12 (↓12) <0.001
Flu 16 18 (↑2) 0.465 18 (↑2) 0.658 14 (↓2) 0.341 13 (↓3) 0.124
Expected a prescription of antibiotic because of:
Cold 19 18 (↓1) 0.801 22 (↑3) 0.06 20 (↑1) 0.569 15 (↓4) 0.019
Flu 43 41 (↓2) 0.345 46 (↑3) 0.143 41 (↓2) 0.319 32 (↓11) <0.001
Taking the full dose of antibiotic prescribed 75 80 (↑5) 0.074 79 (↑4) 0.255 78 (↑3) 0.511 81 (↑6) 0.063
Change in behavior after receiving EAAD campaigns information (YES): 38 39 (↑1) 0.662 52 (↑14) 0.002 47 (↑9) 0.014 48 (↑10) 0.012
I have limited the use of antibiotics 27 43 (↑16) 0.011 38 (↑11) 0.073 42 (↑15) 0.012 43 (↑16) 0.009
I have become more cautious regarding the use of antibiotics 4 24 (↑20) <0.001 19 (↑15) <0.001 20 (↑16) <0.001 16 (↑12) 0.001

* sig.–statistically significant (in bold), significance obtained using Chi2-test