Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Mutat Res. 2016 Jul 30;770(Pt B):299–318. doi: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2016.07.008

Table 6. Results of meta-regression analyses adjusting for age at exposure, dose fractionation/dose rate, mean dose.

Random effects models are fitted via maximum likelihood. Optimal model (with lowest AIC) is given in boldface and underlined. For ischemic heart disease and cerebrovascular disease models are fitted using Mayak morbidity data (main analysis) or Mayak mortality data (subsidiary analysis)

Ischemic heart disease (Mayak morbidity) Ischemic heart disease (Mayak mortality) Heart disease other than ischemic heart disease Cerebrovascular disease (Mayak morbidity) Cerebrovascular disease (Mayak mortality) Other circulatory disease

AIC p-valuea I2 (%) AIC p-valuea I2 (%) AIC p-valuea I2 (%) AIC p-valuea I2 (%) AIC p-valuea I2 (%) AIC p-valuea I2 (%)
Unadjusted -20.28 0.4430 3.17 -24.09 0.7443 0.00 -14.63 0.2041 7.52 18.69 <0.0001 73.10 16.04 0.0226 57.00 4.75 <0.0001 88.99
Adjusted for age at exposure -18.82 0.6654 0.00 -17.29 0.5380 0.00 -11.04 0.1305 8.76 11.09b 0.3717 0.02 17.22 0.0184 39.77 6.75 <0.0001 89.98
Adjusted for radiation dose fractionation -22.95c 0.8161 0.00 -20.67 0.6494 0.00 -12.77 0.1834 9.81 15.44d 0.1545 0.00 19.36 0.0111 42.24 8.41 <0.0001 90.14
Adjusted for mean dose -20.63 0.5483 0.00 -22.28 0.6918 0.00 -13.70 0.1972 6.49 15.97e 0.0858 24.83 17.82 0.0226 41.10 6.43 <0.0001 88.98
Adjusted for age at exposure, radiation dose fractionation -18.11 0.8132 0.00 -16.22 0.6384 0.00 -11.43 0.1917 9.19 14.67f 0.2372 0.00 20.75 0.0075 43.51 8.41 <0.0001 90.14
Adjusted for age at exposure, mean dose -17.48 0.6416 0.00 -15.38 0.4558 0.00 -11.43 0.1919 9.19 11.07g 0.4557 0.01 13.61h 0.2517 0.00 8.41 <0.0001 90.14
Adjusted for radiation dose fractionation, mean dose -21.65 0.8077 0.00 -19.38 0.6318 0.00 -13.26 0.2812 7.73 14.35i 0.2592 0.01 16.94 0.1232 0.01 8.41 <0.0001 90.14
Adjusted for age at exposure, radiation dose fractionation, mean dose -16.44 0.7668 0.00 -16.47 0.7856 0.00 -9.43 0.1071 11.99 14.77j 0.2904 0.01 16.65 0.1672 0.01 0.41 <0.0001 90.14
a

p-value of residual heterogeneity

b

significant improvement in fit over null model (p=0.0019);

c

significant improvement in fit over null model (p=0.0357);

d

significant improvement in fit over null model (p=0.0267);

e

significant improvement in fit over null model (p=0.0299);

f

significant improvement in fit over null model (p=0.0184);

g

significant improvement in fit over null model (p=0.0030);

h

significant improvement in fit over null model (p=0.0402);

i

significant improvement in fit over null model (p=0.0159);

j

significant improvement in fit over null model (p=0.0179).