Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Calcif Tissue Int. 2016 Dec 24;100(3):235–243. doi: 10.1007/s00223-016-0223-6

Table 4.

Comparison of bone histomorphometric measurements for iliac endosteal bone between patients with imcomplete and complete AFF, as well as between AFF patients and premenopausal women

Incomplete AFF
n = 5
Complete AFF
n = 7
p-value* Normal
n = 43
Pooled AFF
n = 12
p-value*
Static
W.Th (μm) 31.7 (2.42) 35.6 (8.61) 0.418 42.4 (8.08) 34.0 (6.86) 0.004
OS/BS (%) 3.44 (2.34) 3.72 (5.48) 0.343 16.2 (10.7) 3.60 (4.29) <0.001
O.Th (μm) 4.10 (1.74) 3.38 (2.17) 0.538 8.63 (2.78) 3.68 (1.95) <0.001
Ob.S/BS (%) 1.22 (2.06) 0.915 (1.35) 0.755 4.40 (3.89) 1.04 (1.60) 0.002
Ob.S/OS (%) 23.6 (26.5) 16.4 (16.0) 0.800 27.8 (19.2) 19.4 (20.2) 0.192
ES/BS (%) 4.44 (2.07) 3.06 (5.27) 0.596 9.62 (5.87) 3.64 (4.15) <0.001
Oc.S/BS (%) 1.58 (1.39) 0.297 (0.420) 0.041# 0.486 (0.745) 0.833 (1.11) 0.173
Oc.S/NOS (%) 1.66 (1.46) 0.329 (0.493) 0.047# 0.615 (0.938) 0.881 (1.17) 0.287
Dynamic
MS/BS (%) 1.96 (2.68) 0.361 (0.955) 0.268 7.02 (6.19) 1.03 (1.95) <0.001
MAR (μm) 0.170 (0.213) 0.070 (0.185) 0.268 0.492 (0.265) 0.112 (0.194) <0.001
BFRs (μm3/μm2/year) 2.86 (5.17) 0.645 (1.71) 0.268 15.1 (14.4) 1.57 (3.55) <0.001
Ac.f (/year) 0.018 (0.027) 0.015 (0.039) 0.527 0.374 (0.364) 0.016 (0.033) <0.001

Data expressed as mean (SD)

*

p-values significant after a Bonferroni adjustment for 12 tests, i.e. p ≤ 0.05/12 = 0.00417 are shown in bold

#

p-values not significant after a Bonferroni correction for 12 tests, i.e. p ≤ 0.05/12 = 0.00417.