Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Semin Cancer Biol. 2016 Sep 13;42:81–88. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2016.08.007

Table 1.

Sensitivity and specificity of FISH by and IHC for the detection of ALK rearrangement in NSCLC cancer by technique and probe

Screening Test Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%)
FISH Number of tumor areas examined under high-power microscopy fields
2 98.6 96.6
3 99.3 100
4 100 100
IHC Probe and Detection System
5A4 by Novocastra with ADVANCE [25] 100 87.5
5A4 by Nichirei with Histofine [25] 100 62.5
D5F3 by Cell Signaling with ADVANCE [25] 100 75
ALK1 by DAKO with FLEX [25] 66 100
ALK1 by DAKO with ADVANCE [25] 66 87.5
5A4 by Novocastra with i-view [27] 100 95.8
5A4 by Novocastra with BenchMark XT [28] 96 100
D5F3 by Cell Signaling BenchMark XT [28] 96 100
5A4 by Novocastra with Bond-MAX [28] 96 100
5A4 by Abcam with Bond-MAX and UltraView Universal DAB [31] 69 99.3
5A4 by Novocastra with Envision Plus [76] 93 100
5A4 by Abcam with Benchmark Ventana [77] 95 100
D5F3 by Ventana with Optiview [78] 98 100
5A4 by Novocastra with Optiview [78] 98 100

Abbreviations: FISH, fluorescence in situ hybridization; IHC, immunohistochemistry