Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Diabet Med. 2016 Jul 9;34(3):356–363. doi: 10.1111/dme.13163

Table 2.

Muscle volume (cm3) with percentage difference and statistical differences between subjects with impaired glucose tolerance and control subjects

Variables Control IGT P % difference
Vastus medialis 342 ± 99 407 ± 119 0.08 +18
Vastus intermedius 342 ± 106 400 ± 95 0.60 +5
Vastus lateralis 369 ± 107 402 ± 97 0.31 +9
Rectus femoris 149 ± 48 122 ± 36 0.06 −17
Knee extensors 1202 ± 323 1164 ± 492 0.77 −3
Semi-membranosus 228 ± 58 268 ± 88 0.11 +17
Biceps femoris 288 ± 77 310 ± 84 0.41 +7
Semi-tendinosus 152 ± 51 167 ± 60 0.43 +9
Knee flexors 669 ± 173 671 ± 291 0.97 +0.3
Soleus 419 ± 115 485 ± 116 0.08 +15
Medial gastrocnemius 185 ± 53 198 ± 72 0.52 +7
Lateral gastrocnemius 106 ± 36 106 ± 46 0.98 0
Ankle plantar flexors 710 ± 187 747 ± 275 0.62 +5
Ankle dorsiflexors 218 ± 50 255 ± 68 0.06 +16

IGT, impaired glucose tolerance.