Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Health Promot. 2016 Aug 8;32(1):198–204. doi: 10.1177/0890117116661157

Table 2.

Type of Stakes and Percentage Weight Loss per Week.a,b

Number of Cases Model 1c,
Beta,
N = 3857
95% CI Model 2d,
Beta,
N = 3857
95% CI Model 3e,
Beta,
n = 1540
95% CI Model 4f,
Beta,
n = 1079
95% CI
Type of deposit
 Anticharity 0.36 −0.39 to −0.33 0.33 −0.36 to −0.31 0.32 g −0.35 to −0.29 0.26 −0.30 to −0.23
 Charity 0.32 −0.36 to −0.28 0.28 −0.31 to −0.25 0.30 g −0.34 to −0.26 0.19 g −0.24 to −0.13
 Friends 0.25 −0.29 to −0.21 0.25 −0.29 to −0.22 0.26g −0.32 to −0.21 0.17 g −0.22 to −0.13
 No deposit Ref Ref Ref Ref
Contract <12 weeks 0.3 −0.32 to −0.28
Has verified contract 0.04 h 0.02 to 0.06
Has supporters on
 website
0.03 0.00 to 0.06 0.05 i 0.00 to 0.10 0.02 −0.02 to 0.05
Has friends on website 0.02 −0.04 to 0.08 0.01 −0.09 to 0.10 0 −0.06 to 0.07

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; Ref, reference category.

a

Participants were located in various locations (online) from 2013 to 2014.

b

Bolded values indicate P value of <0.001.

c

Includes all contracts, controlling for age and sex.

d

Includes all contracts, controlling for sex, age, number of friends, length of contracts, and verification status.

e

Includes contracts 12 weeks or more that were not verified (i.e. no referee or wireless scale), controlling for above factors.

f

Includes contracts 12 weeks or more that were verified, controlling for above factors.

g

Groups that are not statistically different from each other at the overall P = 0.05 level in models 3 and 4.

h

P = 0.001.

i

P = 0.03.