Skip to main content
. 2017 Feb 16;4:2054358117693354. doi: 10.1177/2054358117693354

Table 3.

Bibliometric Analysis of KRESCENT Trainees Compared with Nonfunded Applicants.

Program KRESCENT
Nonfunded applicants
Before After Change Before After Change
Average annual number of manuscripts
 New Investigator 1.02 3.65 (+2.63) 0.80 2.86 (+2.06)
 Post-Doctoral Fellowship 0.40 2.02 (+1.62) 0.41 1.41 (+1.00)
Average number of authors per manuscript
 New Investigator 6.78 8.62 (+1.84) 6.81 7.65 (+0.84)
 Post-Doctoral Fellowship 6.86 8.55 (+1.69) 7.12 7.92 (+0.80)
Average number of addresses per manuscript
 New Investigator 3.63 5.78 (+2.15) 3.58 4.97 (+1.39)
 Post-Doctoral Fellowship 3.37 5.56 (+2.19) 3.66 5.39 (+1.73)
% international collaboration
 New Investigator 34.9 47.5 (+12.6) 30.3 40.1 (+9.8)
 Post-Doctoral Fellowship 41.1 45.2 (+4.1) 38.3 33.7 (−4.6)
Average field-normalized citation rates (ARC)
 New Investigator 1.68 1.88 (+0.20) 1.56 1.77 (+0.21)
 Post-Doctoral Fellowship 1.18 2.26 (+1.08) 1.34 1.49 (+0.15)
Average field-normalized impact factors (ARIF)
 New Investigator 1.59 1.46 (−0.13) 1.37 1.54 (+0.17)
 Post-Doctoral Fellowship 1.28 1.59 (+0.31) 1.36 1.36 (0.00)

Note. Summative data for New Investigators (within 3 years of first academic appointment) and Post-Doctoral Fellows at the time of application to KRESCENT (Before), and after that time, until 2015 (After). Values in parentheses represent changes (“After” minus “Before”). KRESCENT = Kidney Research Scientist Core Education and National Training; ARC = average of relative citation; ARIF = average of relative impact factor.