Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Alzheimers Dement. 2017 Jan 17;13(2):103–110. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2016.09.007

Age of Onset of Hypertension and Risk of Dementia in the Oldest-Old: The 90+ Study

María M Corrada 1,2,3, Kathleen M Hayden 4, Annlia Paganini-Hill 1, Szofia S Bullain 1,3, Jaime DeMoss 3, Colette Aguirre 3, Ron Brookmeyer 5, Claudia H Kawas 1,3,6
PMCID: PMC5318224  NIHMSID: NIHMS821891  PMID: 28108119

Abstract

Introduction

We investigated the association between age of onset of hypertension and dementia risk in an oldest-old cohort.

Methods

Participants are from The 90+ Study, a population-based longitudinal study of people aged 90+ who are survivors from the Leisure World Cohort Study (LWCS). We estimated hypertension onset age using self-reported information from The 90+ Study and LWCS, collected about 20 years earlier. 559 participants without dementia were followed every 6 months for up to 10 years.

Results

224 participants developed dementia during follow-up (mean=2.8 years). Compared with those without hypertension, participants whose hypertension onset age was 80-89 years had a lower dementia risk (HR=0.58, p=0.04) and participants with an onset age of 90+ years had the lowest risk (HR=0.37, p=0.004).

Discussion

Developing hypertension at older ages may protect against dementia. Understanding the mechanisms for this lower risk is important for determining ways to prevent dementia in the very elderly.

Keywords: hypertension, blood pressure, dementia, oldest-old, epidemiology, risk factors

Background

Numerous studies have shown that midlife hypertension is associated with increased dementia risk in later life [1-4]. The effects of developing hypertension in late old age, however, are uncertain and its association with dementia may change with age [5,6]. In the Adult Changes in Thought (ACT) study [6] increased systolic blood pressure (BP) was associated with increased dementia risk at ages <75 but with non-significant decreased risk at ages ≥85. Most studies have not explored these relationships in the oldest-old (people aged 90+). As the oldest-old is the fastest growing segment of the population in the USA [7] and other countries [8], dementia threatens to become a public health epidemic. Elucidating associations between potentially modifiable factors and dementia is crucial to reduce this burden in the oldest-old.

Our objective was to evaluate the association between hypertension and the risk of all-cause dementia in a population-based cohort of individuals aged 90+. We evaluated self-reported history of hypertension including age at first diagnosis as well as measured BP to stage hypertension and accounted for anti-hypertensive medication intake in our analyses.

Methods

Subjects

The 90+ Study is a population-based longitudinal study of aging and dementia. Participants are surviving members of the Leisure World Cohort Study (LWCS)[9], an epidemiological health study of a California retirement community established in 1981. The 13,978 member cohort was mostly female, Caucasian, and highly educated. Survivors aged 90 or older on January/1/2003, on January/1/2008, and on or after January/1/2009 were invited to join The 90+ Study. As of July/17/2013 a total of 1,872 surviving members had been invited to participate and 1,554 individuals (83%) had joined The 90+ Study (Figure). Of the 891 who agreed to in-person longitudinal evaluations, 601 did not have dementia at baseline. Our analyses include the 559 participants who had an in-person evaluation, did not have dementia at baseline, and had additional follow-up. All participants provided informed consent and The University of California, Irvine Institutional Review Board approved all procedures.

Figure. Flow Chart of Participant Inclusion.

Figure

*Other available sources of information were used to determine that 298 (45%) had dementia at baseline. 61 (9%) did not have enough information for a cognitive status determination.

Assessments

Assessments (including neurological examination, neuropsychological testing, review of medical history and medication use) took place between January/1/2003 and July/17/2013. Trained neuropsychological testers administered the neuropsychological test battery [10] including the MMSE [11] and modified MMSE (3MS) [12]. Neurological examiners (trained physicians or nurse practitioners) administered the Clinical Dementia Rating scale [13] and assessed functional abilities using the Functional Activities Questionnaire [14]. Assessments were repeated every six months at the research center or the participant's home.

Cognitive Status Evaluation

Baseline cognitive status was determined from the neurological evaluation or MMSE score. Neurological examiners used MMSE and 3MS results and information from their exam to determine the presence or absence of dementia, applying DSM-IV criteria [15]. In the few occasions when MMSE scores alone were used to determine cognitive status, we used age- and education-specific cut-offs for dementia derived from this cohort [16].

Follow-up cognitive status was usually determined from in-person visits. When an in-person visit was not possible, follow-up occurred by telephone or mail with the participant or an informant. Information from informants included the Dementia Questionnaire [17,18] administered by phone and a mailed questionnaire regarding the participant's cognitive status [19] and functional abilities [14,20]. Participants who were followed-up by phone completed the short version of the Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument (CASI-short) [21]. The diagnostic methods and incidence rates for dementia in this cohort have been previously presented and discussed [22].

History and Age of Onset of Hypertension

As part of the LWCS questionnaire participants were asked, “Has a doctor ever told you that you had high blood pressure? If yes, please indicate how old you were when you were first told this”. Similarly, at The 90+ Study baseline visit, participants were asked “Have you ever been diagnosed with high blood pressure. If yes, please give the approximate year when you were first diagnosed with this condition”. We estimated hypertension onset age by combining information from the LWCS collected about 20 years earlier (range=16-31 years) and from the baseline visit from The 90+ Study. If a participant said ‘YES’ in the LWCS, we used that age of onset. If a participant said ‘NO’ in the LWCS but ‘YES’ in The 90+ Study, we used the age of onset reported in The 90+ Study. Before analysis, people were classified into six “age of onset” categories representing age decades: ‘No hypertension’, ‘<70 years’, ’70-79 years’, ’80-89 years’,’90 years or older’, and ‘unknown age’ for those with hypertension but who did not report an age.

Hypertension Stage by Blood Pressure Classification

At the 90+ baseline evaluation, BP was measured in a sitting position after several minutes of rest using standard sphygmomanometers and cuffs. BP was classified into four stages as determined by the NHLBI-NIH [23] definition of hypertension: ‘normal BP’ (systolic <120 mm Hg and diastolic <80 mm Hg), ‘pre-hypertension’ (systolic between 120-139 mm Hg or diastolic between 80-89 mm Hg), ‘stage 1 hypertension’ (systolic between 140-159 mm Hg or diastolic between 90-99 mm Hg), and stage 2 hypertension (systolic ≥160 or diastolic ≥100 mm Hg). The ‘unmeasured’ group includes people whose BP was not measured at baseline. Although developed for younger individuals, we used these stages for comparison with the literature.

Antihypertensive Medications

Use of anti-hypertensive medications was assessed both in the LWCS questionnaire and during The 90+ Study baseline visit. The LWCS questionnaire asked whether participants had ever taken reserpine (Yes/No/Currently) or any other BP medicine (Yes/No/Currently). At the baseline visit of The 90+ Study, participants brought in their medication containers. The Cerner Multum™ Lexicon database was used to classify medications by drug type and to identify people taking the following categories of anti-hypertensive medications: beta-blockers, diuretics, ACE inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, calcium channel blockers, anti-adrenergic agents, and vasodilators.

Additional variables

Other medical histories reported at the 90+ baseline visit and considered as potential confounders included: stroke, transient ischemic attack, diabetes, heart disease, and depression. Heart disease included any of the following diseases or surgeries: coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation or other arrhythmias, heart valve disease, congestive heart failure, coronary artery bypass, or pacemaker placement. The highest level of education attained was also recorded.

Statistical Approach

To examine the association between hypertension and dementia risk we used Cox regression methods with age as the fundamental time scale. Participants were considered at risk for dementia and contributed person-years from age at baseline evaluation until either age at follow-up evaluation when first determined to have dementia or age at the last follow-up evaluation when determined not to have dementia. To decide which medical histories to include, we examined the bi-variate associations between stroke, transient ischemic attack, heart disease, diabetes, and depression and our main independent variables (age of onset of hypertension and hypertension stage) using chi-square tests. We also examined the same variables in relation to dementia risk using Cox regression.

We first examined the association between a history of hypertension and risk of dementia. We analyzed hypertension history as reported at the LWCS and at The 90+ Study baseline visit. We then estimated the association between age of onset of hypertension and dementia risk using ‘No hypertension’ as the reference group. As hypertension history may increase mortality, we also analyzed age of onset of hypertension with a Fine & Gray model [24] where dementia was the event of interest and death was a competing event (supplemental material). Finally, we estimated the association between hypertension stage at baseline and dementia risk using ‘Normal BP’ as the reference. Hazard ratios (HR) for dementia were estimated and adjusted for age (using age as the time scale), sex, education, and significant medical history variables. All analyses were repeated with adjustment for anti-hypertensive medications (user vs. non-user) at the time of the LWCS or The 90+ Study. We also evaluated the potential for survival bias as described in supplemental materials. We used SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC) for analyses.

Results

Average baseline age was 93.2 years (range=90-103), most participants were women (71%), Caucasian (99%), and had greater than high school education (75%) (Table 1). During the follow-up period (average=2.8 years; range=0.4-10.2 years), 224 (40%) participants were diagnosed with dementia representing an incidence of 14.1% per year. The source of cognitive status determination at last follow-up was most often neurological exam (81%), followed by informant questionnaires (10%), phone CASI (7%), and MMSE score (3%).

Table 1.

Characteristics of Participants: The 90+ Study

Characteristic Mean (SD) [Range]
Age at 90+ Study baseline, years 93.2 (2.5) [90-103]

Follow-up time for dementia, years 2.8 (2.0) [0.4-10.2]

Age at LWCS survey, years 69.6 (4.4) [60-84]

Interval between LWCS and 90+ baseline, years 23.6 (3.0) [16-31]

Number (%)

Women 398 (71.2)

Caucasian 553 (98.9)

Education
    ≤High school 139 (24.9)
    Vocational/some college 189 (33.8)
    College or higher degree 231 (41.3)

Hypertension history at LWCS 169 (30.2)

Anti-hypertensive medication use at LWCS 126 (22.5)

Hypertension history at 90+ baseline 321 (58.1)

Age of onset of hypertension
    No hypertension 217 (38.8)
    <70 years 157 (28.1)
    70-79 years 50 (8.9)
    80-89 years 68 (12.2)
    90+ years 41 (7.3)
    Unknown age 26 (4.7)

Hypertension stage at 90+ baselinea
    Normal blood pressure 43 (7.7)
    Pre-hypertension 162 (29.0)
    Stage 1 hypertension 164 (29.3)
    Stage 2 hypertension 125 (22.4)
    Unmeasured 65 (11.6)

Anti-hypertensive medication use at 90+ baseline
    All participants 403 (73.4)
    According to age of onset of hypertension
        No hypertension 87 (41.1)
        <70 years 145 (93.6)
        70-79 years 47 (94.0)
        80-89 years 65 (95.6)
        90+ years 36 (87.8)
        Unknown age 23 (92.0)
    According to hypertension stage
        Normal blood pressure 30 (69.8)
        Pre-hypertension 124 (78.5)
        Stage 1 hypertension 122 (74.9)
        Stage 2 hypertension 92 (74.8)
        No blood pressure measurement 35 (56.5)

Medical history at 90+ baseline
    Heart diseaseb 265 (47.4)
    Stroke 53 (9.5)
    Transient ischemic attack 83 (15.4)
    Diabetes 33 (5.9)
    Depression 58 (10.5)

Incident dementia during follow-up 224 (40.1)

Source of cognitive diagnosis at last follow-up
    Neurological exam 451 (80.7)
    MMSE 14 (2.5)
    Informant questionnaires 56 (10.0)
    Telephone CASI 38 (6.8)

Abbreviations: LWCS=Leisure World Cohort Study, MMSE=mini-mental state exam, CASI= cognitive abilities screening instrument.

Missing data: anti-hypertensive medication use at 90+ baseline N=10, stroke history N=2, transient ischemic attack history N=20, diabetes N=3, depression N=5.

a

Hypertension stages defined as Normal = systolic <120 mm Hg and diastolic <80 mm Hg, Pre-hypertension = systolic between 120-139 mm Hg or diastolic between 80-89 mm Hg), Stage 1 hypertension = systolic between 140-159 mm Hg or diastolic between 90-99 mm Hg, and Stage 2 hypertension = systolic ≥160 or diastolic ≥100 mm Hg.

b

Heart disease includes a history of any of the following: coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation or other arrhythmias, heart valve disease, congestive heart failure, coronary artery bypass, or pacemaker

Reported history of hypertension was 30% at the time of the LWCS and increased to 58% at the 90+ baseline visit (Table 1). With the combined information to estimate age of hypertension onset, 61% of participants reported having been diagnosed with hypertension. The most common age of onset was <70 years (28%) but 109 (19%) participants reported an age of onset of 80+ years. About half (51%) of participants had either Stage 1 or Stage 2 hypertension. At the 90+ baseline visit, approximately three-quarters (73%) of participants were taking at least one anti-hypertensive medication (Table 1); the most common types were diuretics (42%), beta blockers (29%), calcium channel blockers (26%), and ACE inhibitors (22%).

Evaluations of the association between medical histories and the main independent and dependent variables revealed that history of heart disease was associated with an increased dementia risk (HR=1.30, p=0.04) and with age of onset of hypertension (p<0.001) but not with BP stage (p=0.79). Histories of stroke (HR=1.72, p=0.01) or depression (HR=1.53, p=0.04) were associated with increased dementia risk but not with age of onset of hypertension or hypertension stage (all p>0.50). Thus, heart disease was the only medical history included as a potential confounder.

History of hypertension and dementia risk

We first examined the association between history of hypertension and dementia risk (Table 2). Hypertension at the time of the LWCS was unrelated to dementia risk (HR=1.09, p=0.56). In contrast, hypertension at the baseline 90+ visit was associated with a lower dementia risk (HR=0.68, p=0.005).

Table 2.

Hazard Ratios of Developing All-Cause Dementia In Relation to History of Hypertension

Adjusted for age, sex, education, and history of heart diseasea (N=559) Adjusted for age, sex, education, history of heart disease and anti-hypertensive medication usea,b (N=549)



History of Hypertension Hazard Ratio (95 % CI) p-value Hazard Ratio (95 % CI) p-value



At LWCS
    No 1.00 (reference) -- 1.00 (reference) --
    Yes 1.09 (0.82 - 1.46) 0.56 1.25 (0.83 - 1.90) 0.29



At 90+ baseline
    No 1.00 (reference) -- 1.00 (reference) --
    Yes 0.68 (0.51 - 0.89) 0.005 0.67 (0.48 - 0.94) 0.02

Abbreviations: LWCS = Leisure World Cohort Study; CI = confidence interval

a

Cox regression models adjusted for age by using age as the time scale and adjusted for sex, education, history of heart disease, and anti-hypertensive medication by including them as covariates.

b

Anti-hypertension medication at the LWCS was used for the LWCS history of hypertension analysis and anti-hypertension medication at the 90+baseline was used for the 90+ baseline history of hypertension analysis.

Age of onset of hypertension and dementia risk

Given the previous result regarding history of hypertension at two time points, we examined the association between age of onset of hypertension and risk of dementia (Table 3). Participants with onset at 80-89 years had a significantly lower risk of dementia compared with those with no history (HR=0.58, p=0.04) and those with onset at 90+ years had the lowest risk (HR=0.37, p=0.004). A test for trend showed a significant decreasing risk with increasing age of hypertension onset (p=0.002) (Table 3). The HRs were virtually unchanged when analyses were adjusted for baseline use of any anti-hypertensive medication (Table 3) or for individual classes of anti-hypertensive medications (eTable 1), suggesting the association between older age of hypertension and lower dementia risk is independent of anti-hypertensive medication use. A competing risk analysis showed similar results (eFigure).

Table 3.

Hazard Ratios of Developing All-Cause Dementia In Relation to Age of Onset of Hypertension

Adjusted for age, sex, education, and history of heart diseasea (N=559) Adjusted for age, sex, education, history of heart disease and anti-hypertensive medication usea,b (N=549)



Age of Onset of Hypertension Hazard Ratio (95 % CI) p-value Hazard Ratio (95 % CI) p-value



No Hypertension 1.00 (reference) -- 1.00 (reference) --
Unknown age 0.96 (0.55 - 1.66) 0.87 1.07 (0.60 - 1.90) 0.82
<70 0.79 (0.56 - 1.11) 0.17 0.79 (0.54 - 1.17) 0.24
70-79 1.09 (0.69 - 1.73) 0.72 1.11 (0.67 - 1.84) 0.68
80-89 0.58 (0.34 - 0.98) 0.04 0.60 (0.34 - 1.06) 0.08
90+ 0.37 (0.19 - 0.73) 0.004 0.38 (0.19 - 0.76) 0.007



Test for trendc 0.83 (0.74 - 0.94) 0.002 0.84 (0.74 - 0.96) 0.01

Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval

a

Cox regression models adjusted for age by using age as the time scale and adjusted for sex, education, history of heart disease, and anti-hypertensive medication by including them as covariates

b

Anti-hypertension medication use at the 90+baseline was used analyses

c

Test for trend excludes people with unknown age of hypertension onset (N=26)

Hypertension stage and dementia risk

Compared with people with normal BP, people in all stages of hypertension showed lower, although non-significant, risks for dementia (Table 4). A trend for decreasing risk with increasing levels of hypertension was observed (p=0.07) (Table 4). Results for analyses with adjustment for baseline use of any anti-hypertensive medication (Table 4) or for individual classes of anti-hypertensive medications (eTable 2) were almost identical, suggesting that the association between BP stage and dementia risk is independent of antihypertensive medication use.

Table 4.

Hazard Ratios of Developing All-Cause Dementia In Relation to Hypertension Stage

Adjusted for age, sex, education, and history of heart diseaseb (N=559) Adjusted for age, sex, education, history of heart disease and anti-hypertensive medication useb,c (N=549)



Hypertension Stagea Hazard Ratio (95 % CI) p-value Hazard Ratio (95 % CI) p-value



Normal BP 1.00 (reference) -- 1.00 (reference) --
No BP Measurement 0.77 (0.41 - 1.46) 0.42 0.76 (0.40 - 1.45) 0.41
Pre-Hypertension 0.87 (0.50 - 1.53) 0.64 0.84 (0.48 - 1.48) 0.55
Stage 1 Hypertension 0.75 (0.43 - 1.32) 0.32 0.75 (0.42 - 1.31) 0.31
Stage 2 Hypertension 0.64 (0.35 - 1.15) 0.13 0.61 (0.34 - 1.11) 0.10



Test for trendd 0.86 (0.74 - 1.01) 0.07 0.86 (0.74 - 1.01) 0.07

Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval; BP=blood pressure

a

Hypertension stages defined as Normal = systolic <120 mm Hg and diastolic <80 mm Hg, Pre-hypertension = systolic between 120-139 mm Hg or diastolic between 80-89 mm Hg), Stage 1 hypertension = systolic between 140-159 mm Hg or diastolic between 90-99 mm Hg, and Stage 2 hypertension = systolic ≥160 or diastolic ≥100 mm Hg.

b

Cox regression models adjusted for age by using age as the time scale and adjusted for sex, education, history of heart disease, and anti-hypertensive medication by including them as covariates

c

Anti-hypertension medication use at the 90+baseline was used for analyses

d

Test for trend excludes people with no BP measurement (N=65)

Discussion

In this cohort study of 559 participants aged 90+, history of hypertension reported at entry into The 90+ Study was related to a lower dementia risk compared with those with no history of hypertension. This reduced risk was limited to participants who reported onset of hypertension after age 80. In addition, there was a trend for lower dementia risk with increasing severity of hypertension. These associations were independent of anti-hypertensive medication use. To our knowledge, our study is the first to report in the oldest-old and to include hypertension by age of onset.

Observational studies have consistently reported that hypertension during mid-life (measuring BP directly) is related to an increased dementia risk and AD [1-4]. This association, however, changes with age and hypertension appears to no longer be a risk factor at very advanced ages [25]. The changing association with increasing age is evident in the ACT study [6] and in a pooled analysis of the Rotterdam and Gothenburg H-70 studies [5]. In the ACT study, a high systolic BP (≥160mmHg) was associated with a greater dementia risk in the youngest group (65-74 years) but with a non-significant lower dementia risk (HR=0.64) in the oldest group (≥85 years) [6]. In the Rotterdam and Gothenburg H-70 studies, higher systolic BP was not associated with dementia risk at younger ages (55-74 years: HR=0.96 per 10 mmHg; 75-84 years: HR=0.95 per 10 mmHg) but was associated with a decreased dementia risk at ages≥85 (HR=0.89 per 10 mmHG) [5]. Although significance of results is somewhat different, the interpretation is the same as ours: at older ages, dementia risk is lowest in people with the highest BP.

Other studies in the very elderly have also found associations between hypertension and lower dementia risk. In the Kungsholmen Project (average age at baseline=86), a high diastolic BP (>90 mmHg) was associated with a lower risk of developing dementia 6 to 9 years later (HR=0.55) [26]. In contrast, a high systolic BP (≥160 mmHg) was not associated with dementia risk (RR=1.2).

The association between hypertension and reduced dementia risk in the oldest-old can be explained in several ways. First, adequate cerebral perfusion may help maintain normal cognition. Individuals who develop hypertension very late in life may be successfully marshaling a physiological compensatory mechanism to maintain adequate cerebral perfusion in the face of age-associated vascular changes. In support of this hypothesis, individuals with lower cerebral blood flow have been found to have higher rates of cognitive decline [27] and prevalent dementia [28]. If increased BP is a compensatory mechanism, it would also help maintain adequate perfusion in other vital organs [29] and may explain the protective associations between increased BP and other outcomes such as mortality [30], frailty indicators [31], disability [32], and physical decline [33] in the very elderly.

Another explanation for the observed association may be that people with hypertension take medications that lower the risk of dementia. Studies of younger elderly have reported lower dementia risk in people taking different classes of anti-hypertensive medications [34-36]. These studies, however, have not included the oldest-old and we did not find similar effects (data not shown). Moreover, if anti-hypertensive medications were responsible for a lower risk, we would expect the lowest dementia risk in people taking medication for a long time (those with an early age of hypertension onset), rather than in people who have taken medications for a short time (those with oldest age of hypertension onset) as seen in our study. Furthermore, our results were essentially unchanged when adjusting for use of anti-hypertensive medications.

Our observed association could also be explained by reverse causality. Others have noted a BP decline a few years before dementia onset [26,37]. Thus, rather than lower BP being detrimental for cognition, decreasing BP may be a consequence of the neurodegenerative process. Although we cannot completely rule out this possibility, we previously observed in our cohort that BP declined at the same rate in those who died with and without dementia [38]. Thus, a decline in BP appears to be related to dying rather than to dementia onset.

Others have suggested selection bias as an explanation for the observed lower dementia risk in very elderly hypertensives [39]. This explanation rests on a scenario where hypertensives who are most likely to develop dementia imminently die at higher rates than hypertensives who are less likely to develop dementia imminently. If so, we would underestimate the incidence rates of dementia among hypertensives. To explore this possibility we performed analyses that estimated the association between MMSE (as a surrogate for dementia risk) and death but found no evidence to support such selection bias as an explanation for our findings (see supplementary material). Furthermore, if selection bias accounts for the observed protective effect of hypertension, other vascular diseases associated with increased mortality (such as stroke and heart disease) would be expected to have a similar protective effect, which was not the case in our study.

Our study has several limitations. First, The 90+ Study participants are mostly women (71%), Caucasian (99%), and well educated (75% high school graduates) and thus not representative of the oldest-old in the US. These characteristics, however, reflect to some extent the demographics of a large subgroup of oldest-old in Orange County (76% women and 91% Caucasian) [40] and the US (76% women and 88% Caucasian) [7]. Second, although our dementia follow-up was up to 10 years, our average follow-up was only 2.8 years due to the high mortality of participants. Third, as with all observational studies, residual confounding remains a possibility as other unaccounted factors may be responsible for the observed association. Fourth, we had only one BP measurement per visit, which could result in misclassification and thus underestimate the disease-exposure associations. Finally, our results are limited to people who survived to age 90 and older without dementia and cannot be extended to younger people.

Our study has unique strengths. We report on one of the largest cohorts of oldest-old ever assembled. We had data regarding onset of hypertension and anti-hypertensive medication use from 20 years earlier. Evaluations for dementia were frequent (every 6 months) minimizing the likelihood of misclassification of people who might develop dementia and die soon after; a considerable problem in studies of the very elderly who have high mortality. Finally, we achieved a low attrition rate (7%) by obtaining follow-up information from informants on participants too frail or impaired to be examined in-person.

In this cohort of oldest-old participants who were free of dementia into their 90s, hypertension onset late in life was associated with a lower dementia risk compared with those with no hypertension. These findings suggest that our knowledge of dementia risk associated with hypertension and the physiological effects of hypertension in younger elderly do not translate directly to the oldest-old. Whether hypertension in the oldest-old is a marker of better health or a necessary compensatory mechanism is not known. Further investigation of the mechanisms related to the reduced risk associated with onset of hypertension in late life is important to determine potential strategies to prevent dementia in the very elderly.

Supplementary Material

NIHMS821891-supplement.docx (436.1KB, docx)

Research In Context.

  1. Systematic review: We reviewed the literature using PubMed and reference lists from relevant articles. The association between age of onset of hypertension or hypertension defined through direct blood pressure measurements and dementia has not been studied in the oldest-old. We identified several publications on younger elderly and publications that suggest an association that changes with age.

  2. Interpretation: Studies have shown hypertension during midlife to be associated with an increased risk of dementia in later life. We extend research of hypertension and dementia to the oldest-old. We found that compared to people without hypertension, people whose age of onset of hypertension was 80-89 years had a lower risk of dementia and those with an age of onset of 90+ years had an even lower risk.

  3. Future Directions: As the association between hypertension and dementia appears to change with age, understanding the mechanisms for the lower risk of dementia with increasing age of onset of hypertension is important. The possibility that at very old ages a higher blood pressure is essential for maintaining adequate perfusion and thus normal cognition, is an important question that needs exploring. The oldest-old are the fastest growing segment of the population and have the highest rates of dementia. Thus, understanding factors that contribute to dementia are important for developing strategies to prevent dementia in the oldest-old.

Acknowledgements

We thank the participants, their relatives, and the staff of The 90+ Study.

Source of Funding

This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (R01AG21055, R01AG042444, and R01CA32197) and from the Earl Carroll Trust Fund and Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories. The funding organizations had no role in the design or conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, or interpretation of the data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors do not have any conflicts of interest.

References

  • 1.Launer LJ, Ross GW, Petrovitch H, Masaki K, Foley D, White LR, et al. Midlife blood pressure and dementia: the Honolulu Asia Aging Study. Neurobiol Aging. 2000;21:49–55. doi: 10.1016/s0197-4580(00)00096-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kivipelto M, Helkala EL, Laakso MP, Hanninen T, Hallikainen M, Alhainen K, et al. Midlife vascular risk factors and Alzheimer's disease in later life: longitudinal, population based study. British Medical Journal. 2001;322:1447–1451. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7300.1447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Yamada M, Kasagi F, Sasaki H, Masunari N, Mimori Y, Suzuki G. Association between dementia and midlife risk factors: the Radiation Effects Research Foundation Adult Health Study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003;51:410–414. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2003.51117.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Whitmer RA, Sidney S, Selby J, Johnston SC, Yaffe K. Midlife cardiovascular risk factors and risk of dementia in late life. Neurology. 2005;64:277–281. doi: 10.1212/01.WNL.0000149519.47454.F2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ruitenberg A, Skoog I, Ott A, Aevarsson O, Witteman JC, Lernfelt B, et al. Blood pressure and risk of dementia: results from the Rotterdam study and the Gothenburg H-70 Study. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2001;12:33–39. doi: 10.1159/000051233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Li G, Rhew IC, Shofer JB, Kukull WA, Breitner JC, Peskind E, et al. Age-varying association between blood pressure and risk of dementia in those aged 65 and older: a community-based prospective cohort study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007;55:1161–1167. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01233.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.He W, Muenchrath MN. 90+ in the United States: 2006–2008. U.S. Census Bureau 2011; American Community Survey Reports, ACS-17 U.S. Government Printing Office; Washington, DC.: [Google Scholar]
  • 8.United Nations Department of Economics and Social Affairs Population Division World Population Prospects: The 2015 Revision, key findings and advance tables. 2015. Working Paper No. ESA/P/WP.241.
  • 9.Paganini-Hill A, Ross RK, Henderson BE. Prevalence of chronic disease and health practices in a retirement community. J Chronic Dis. 1986;39:699–707. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(86)90153-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Whittle C, Corrada MM, Dick M, Ziegler R, Kahle-Wrobleski K, Paganini-Hill A, et al. Neuropsychological data in nondemented oldest-old: The 90+ Study. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2007;29:290–299. doi: 10.1080/13803390600678038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12:189–198. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Teng EL, Chui HC. The Modified Mini-Mental State (3MS) Examination. J Clin Psychiatry. 1987;48:314–318. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Morris JC. The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR): Current version and scoring rules. Neurology. 1993;43:2412–2414. doi: 10.1212/wnl.43.11.2412-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Pfeffer RI, Kurosaki TT, Harrah CH, Chance JM, Filos S. Measurement of functional activities in older adults in the community. J Gerontol. 1982;37:323–329. doi: 10.1093/geronj/37.3.323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.APA . Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th. ed. American Psychiatric Association; Washington, DC: 1994. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kahle-Wrobleski K, Corrada MM, Li B, Kawas CH. Sensitivity and specificity of the mini-mental state examination for identifying dementia in the oldest-old: The 90+ Study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007;55:284–289. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01049.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kawas CH, Segal J, Stewart WF, Corrada MM, Thal LJ. A validation study of the Dementia Questionnaire. Arch Neurol. 1994;51:901–906. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1994.00540210073015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Silverman JM, Breitner JC, Mohs RC, Davis KL. Reliability of the family history method in genetic studies of Alzheimer's Disease and related dementias. Am J Psychiatry. 1986;143:1279–1282. doi: 10.1176/ajp.143.10.1279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Clark CM, Ewbank DC. Performance of the dementia severity rating scale: a caregiver questionnaire for rating severity in Alzheimer disease. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 1996;10:31–39. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Katz S, Ford AB, Moskowitz RW, Jackson BA, Jaffe MW. Studies of illness in the aged. The index of ADL: A standardized measure of biological and psychosocial function. JAMA. 1963;185:914–919. doi: 10.1001/jama.1963.03060120024016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Teng EL, Hasegawa K, Homma A, Imai Y, Larson E, Graves A, et al. The Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument (CASI): a practical test for cross-cultural epidemiological studies of dementia. Int Psychogeriatr. 1994;6:45–58. doi: 10.1017/s1041610294001602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Corrada MM, Brookmeyer R, Paganini-Hill A, Berlau D, Kawas CH. Dementia incidence continues to increase with age in the oldest-old: The 90+ Study. Ann Neurol. 2010;67:114–121. doi: 10.1002/ana.21915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, Cushman WC, Green LA, Izzo JL, Jr., et al. The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 report. JAMA. 2003;289:2560–2572. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.19.2560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Fine JP, Gray RJ. A Proportional Hazards Model for the Subdistribution of a Competing Risk. J Amer Statist Assoc. 1999;94:496–509. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Qiu C, Winblad B, Fratiglioni L. The age-dependent relation of blood pressure to cognitive function and dementia. Lancet Neurol. 2005;4:487–499. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(05)70141-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Qiu C, Winblad B, Fratiglioni L. Low diastolic pressure and risk of dementia in very old people: a longitudinal study. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2009;28:213–219. doi: 10.1159/000236913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Kitagawa K, Oku N, Kimura Y, Yagita Y, Sakaguchi M, Hatazawa J, et al. Relationship between cerebral blood flow and later cognitive decline in hypertensive patients with cerebral small vessel disease. Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension. 2009;32:816–820. doi: 10.1038/hr.2009.100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Ruitenberg A, den Heijer T, Bakker SL, van Swieten JC, Koudstaal PJ, Hofman A, et al. Cerebral hypoperfusion and clinical onset of dementia: the Rotterdam Study. Ann Neurol. 2005;57:789–794. doi: 10.1002/ana.20493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Goodwin JS. Embracing complexity: A consideration of hypertension in the very old. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2003;58:653–658. doi: 10.1093/gerona/58.7.m653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Boshuizen HC, Izaks GJ, van Buuren S, Ligthart GJ. Blood pressure and mortality in elderly people aged 85 and older: community based study. BMJ. 1998;316:1780–1784. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7147.1780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Taekema DG, Maier AB, Westendorp RG, de Craen AJ. Higher blood pressure is associated with higher handgrip strength in the oldest old. American journal of hypertension. 2011;24:83–89. doi: 10.1038/ajh.2010.185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Richmond R, Law J, Kay-Lambkin F. Higher blood pressure associated with higher cognition and functionality among centenarians in Australia. American journal of hypertension. 2011;24:299–303. doi: 10.1038/ajh.2010.236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Sabayan B, Oleksik AM, Maier AB, van Buchem MA, Poortvliet RK, de Ruijter W, et al. High blood pressure and resilience to physical and cognitive decline in the oldest old: the Leiden 85-plus Study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012;60:2014–2019. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.04203.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Khachaturian AS, Zandi PP, Lyketsos CG, Hayden KM, Skoog I, Norton MC, et al. Antihypertensive medication use and incident Alzheimer disease: the Cache County Study. Arch Neurol. 2006;63:686–692. doi: 10.1001/archneur.63.5.noc60013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Yasar S, Xia J, Yao W, Furberg CD, Xue QL, Mercado CI, et al. Antihypertensive drugs decrease risk of Alzheimer disease: Ginkgo Evaluation of Memory Study. Neurology. 2013;81:896–903. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182a35228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Tully PJ, Dartigues JF, Debette S, Helmer C, Artero S, Tzourio C. Dementia risk with antihypertensive use and blood pressure variability: A cohort study. Neurology. 2016;87:601–608. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002946. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Skoog I, Lernfelt B, Landahl S, Palmertz B, Andreasson LA, Nilsson L, et al. 15-year longitudinal study of blood pressure and dementia. Lancet. 1996;347:1141–1145. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)90608-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Corrada MM, Bullain SS, Kim R, Sonnen JA, Kawas CH. Blood pressure decline in the oldest-old is related to death, not dementia or Alzheimer's disease pathology. Alzheimers Dement. 2013;9:P754. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Power MC, Weuve J, Gagne JJ, McQueen MB, Viswanathan A, Blacker D. The association between blood pressure and incident Alzheimer disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Epidemiology. 2011;22:646–659. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31822708b5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.U.S. Census Bureau Census 2000 Summary File 2 (SF 2) 100-Percent Data. [February 7, 2011];PCT3. Sex by Age. 2001 http://factfinder.census.gov.

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

NIHMS821891-supplement.docx (436.1KB, docx)

RESOURCES